Aranesp Settlement Results in $762M Payment by Amgen

Amgen has agreed to pay $762 million to settle a whistleblower lawsuit and criminal charges this week, which allege that the drug maker illegally promoted their anemia medications Aranesp and Epogen. 

The settlement and plea agreement includes a $150 million criminal penalty, with the remainder of the money used to settle 10 different lawsuits.

The U.S. attorney’s office in charge of the case secured the deal in federal court in Brooklyn, New York on Tuesday. The deal includes a $612 million civil settlement, $136 million in criminal fines and a $14 million criminal forfeiture payment.

The company will also enter into a five-year corporate integrity agreement requiring that the company will meet federal regulations or executives and members of its board will be held directly responsible by the government.

Amgen Allegedly Offered Illegal Deals to Doctors

Aranesp (darbepoetin alfa) and Epogen (Epoetin alfa) are prescribed to patients with kidney disease, anemia, HIV and cancer to stimulate bones to increase the production of red blood cells. They are also prescribed to patients preparing to undergo major non-heart surgery to reduce the number of transfusions such patients must receive. In 2008, Aranesp sales were $3.1 billion.

According to a Washington Post report in July, Amgen allegedly encouraged doctors to use the drugs by overfilling vials by as much as 25 percent, and offered discounts to doctors who used the drugs in large volume. This allowed doctors to take advantage of what is known as the “spread,” the difference between the price they paid for the drugs and the price they charged patients.

Lobbyists were also employed to help, getting Congress and Medicare officials to sign off on a pricing structure that allowed doctors and hospitals to be reimbursed for more than they actually paid for the drugs.

The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission estimates that the overpayments reached as high as 30%. Some doctors made as much as $300,000 a year off of the drugs alone, while helping Amgen generate huge profits.

This week’s settlement means that the plaintiffs who brought the 10 whistleblower lawsuits will receive a percentage of the civil settlement money collected by the government. Under the qui tam provision of the False Claims Act, whistleblowers who report a false claim against the government may be entitled to receive a portion of any money that the government recovers. In return, the whistleblower must be the first to bring the case to the government’s attention, and must not publicize the claim until the Justice Department decides to prosecute the claim.

Image Credit: |

1 Comments

  • DanaMarch 20, 2019 at 5:19 am

    My daughter has experienced many Problems with Fresenius dialysis clinic. Most seem very unethical and Endangering her life. Refuse to change dialyzers when Allergic Forced cutting of treatment times Unsanitary methods Flooding of clinics standing water Recording false statements in to Medical records We have found the personnel in Professional

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

AT&T Data Breach Lawsuits Seek Damages for 70M Customers Whose Information Was Released
AT&T Data Breach Lawsuits Seek Damages for 70M Customers Whose Information Was Released (Posted today)

AT&T faces a growing number of data breach class action lawsuits, which plaintiffs say should be consolidated before one federal judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings.

Fairness of Philips CPAP Recall Settlement Being Evaluated By MDL Judge
Fairness of Philips CPAP Recall Settlement Being Evaluated By MDL Judge (Posted yesterday)

A federal judge has held a fairness hearing for a proposed Philips CPAP class action lawsuit settlement, which seeks to resolve claims that consumers suffered economic damages due to the massive recall over toxic sound abatement foam.