Caldera Desara Mesh Sling Lawsuit Filed Over Pelvic Complications

A Georgia couple has filed a product liability lawsuit against two vaginal mesh manufacturers, alleging that problems with the Caldera Desara pelvic mesh sling caused severe complications. 

The complaint was filed last month by Sherry and Reginald Wimbush in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, naming Caldera Medical, Inc. and American Medical Systems (AMS) as defendants.

According to the pelvic mesh lawsuit, Sherry Wimbush was implanted with a Caldera Desara bladder sling in December 2009 to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI). As a result of complications caused by the product, Wimbush alleges that she suffered vaginal pain, pelvic pain, bleeding, vaginal pressure, painful intercourse and had to undergo additional surgeries.

Learn More About

Vaginal Mesh Lawsuits

Complications from transvaginal mesh may cause severe injuries.

Learn More About this Lawsuit SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

Wimbush indicates that she never would have allowed the implant if she and her doctor had been properly informed about the risks associated with the pelvic mesh sling.

The Desara mesh sling contains a monofilament polypropylene mesh, which the complaint alleges is biologically incompatible with human tissue and causes an immune response in a large number of women. The body’s reaction to the mesh allegedly degrades pelvic tissue and leads to severe adverse reactions, the lawsuit claims.

The case is one of a growing number of bladder sling lawsuits filed by women throughout the United States who say that a variety of transvaginal mesh products caused them to suffer injuries.

Last summer, the FDA issued a warning about the risks of problems when vaginal mesh sling products are used for repair of pelvic organ prolapse and stress urinary incontinence.

Between 2008 and 2010, the FDA received more than 1,500 reports of transvaginal mesh problems, including erosion of the mesh into the vagina, contraction or shrinkage of the mesh, infections, pelvic pain, urinary problems, vaginal scarring and other complications.

4 Comments

  • susanDecember 17, 2022 at 12:23 pm

    ERROSION FROM THE SLING 3 YEARS LATER WITH LOTS OF PAIN AND PRESSURE IN BETWEEN,,,

  • DeidreOctober 23, 2013 at 3:59 pm

    Vaginal pain since surgery June 26,2013 Been advised by a secon opinion to have a nerve block or surgery again.

  • DeidreOctober 23, 2013 at 3:55 pm

    Bleeding for fourteen weeks after first surgery and twelve weeks after second surgery , been experiencing vaginal from the start

  • JulieApril 5, 2012 at 3:25 pm

    I had insertion of bladder sling mesh (tvt) in Oct. 2007 by a urogynogologist. I never had any problems such as pain, bleeding, loss of urine, or pain with intercourse. I do suspect that my body may be having a systemic reaction at this time. The surgeon is having a CT scan of my pelvis and abdomen to R/O any other problems.

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

AT&T Data Breach Lawsuits Seek Damages for 70M Customers Whose Information Was Released
AT&T Data Breach Lawsuits Seek Damages for 70M Customers Whose Information Was Released (Posted yesterday)

AT&T faces a growing number of data breach class action lawsuits, which plaintiffs say should be consolidated before one federal judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings.

Fairness of Philips CPAP Recall Settlement Being Evaluated By MDL Judge
Fairness of Philips CPAP Recall Settlement Being Evaluated By MDL Judge (Posted 2 days ago)

A federal judge has held a fairness hearing for a proposed Philips CPAP class action lawsuit settlement, which seeks to resolve claims that consumers suffered economic damages due to the massive recall over toxic sound abatement foam.