Mirena IUD Pseudotumor Cerebri Problems Led To Cluster Headaches, Blurred Vision: Lawsuit

The side effects of a Mirena IUD implanted in a North Carolina woman for long term birth control allegedly caused her to suffer a dangerous medical condition known as pseudotumor cerebri (PTC), which resulted in cluster headaches, blurred vision, nausea, dizziness and other problems associated with the build up of fluid pressure on the brain. 

The complaint (PDF) was filed by Abigail Michel in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey on June 3, alleging that Bayer Healthcare failed to adequately warn about the risk of Mirena IUD pseudotumor cerebri problems.

The intrauterine device (IUD) is a small, T-shaped implant designed to prevent pregnancy for up to five years, releasing the progestin levonorgestrel, which has been linked to a risk of pseudotumor cerebri in other birth control products. However, the lawsuit indicates that Mirena warnings failed to adequately warn women that the IUD birth control implant may cause a dangerous buildup of pressure on the brain, which can cause permanent damage to the optic nerve and other side effects.

Did You Know?

Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled

Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.

Learn More

Michel began suffering cluster headaches, blurring vision, nausea and dizziness, which was later diagnosed as papilledema and possible pseudotumor cerebri (PTC), which is also commonly referred to as idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH). She was diagnosed with the condition in September 2013, after undergoing an MRI and a diagnostic lumbar puncture, and the Mirena IUD was removed in November 2013. However, the lawsuit indicates that she has been left with permanent problems from the Mirena IUD as a result of optic nerve damage caused by the build up of pressure around the brain.

“Defendants failed to adequately and properly test the Mirena both before and after placing it on the market,” the lawsuit states. “A prudent seller in the exercise of ordinary care would and should have discovered and foreseen the dangerous and defective condition of Mirena and its potential to cause severe conditions, including PTC/IIH, when placing the product on the market.”

The case is one of a growing number of similar Mirena IUD lawsuits over pseudotumor cerebri problems filed in recent months, which each allege that Bayer withheld information from women and the medical community about the risk that levonorgestrel released by the implant may cause the sudden buildup of pressure on the brain. Lawsuits allege that this prevented users and doctors from promptly recognizing the symptoms of PTC/IIH, which may have allowed women to avoid long-term optic nerve damage.

In several other countries, including South Africa and Hong Kong, warning information provided with the Mirena IUD indicate that papilledema is a possible side effect. However, Bayer has not given women in America or the U.S. medical community the same information.

Amid a growing number of Mirena pseudotumor cerebri cases brought throughout the federal court system against Bayer, a request was filed last year with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) to centralize the cases before one judge. However, that request was rejected, so Kessler’s claim and others filed by other women are proceeding without coordinated pretrial proceedings.

In addition to problems with pseudotumor cererbri, Mirena IUDs have also been linked to reports of the IUD perforating the uterus or moving out of position, causing severe internal injuries for many women. There is a separate multidistrict litigation (MDL) established for Mirena migration injury lawsuits, which currently includes about 4,000 complaints pending before U.S. District Judge Cathy Seibel in the Southern District of New York, where a small group of “bellwether” cases are being prepared for early trial dates.

Image Credit: Image via 360b / Shutterstock.com

3 Comments

  • ToshandaJuly 26, 2016 at 1:55 am

    I had the mirena Iud back in 03 had it removed after it caused PID have had headaches and complications every since was duagnosed with depression soon after it wasn't untill mothers day may 9, 2016 of course no one would take My case do to how long ago it was.

  • TraceyJune 24, 2016 at 6:17 pm

    This iud almost killed me but since it wasn't surgically removed none if the attorneys would take my case. I had to have a complete hysterectomy and open heart surgery to relace my mechanical valve bc the infection caused by the iud went to my heart!! I also had a mild stroke after I was admitted into the hospital on Dec 5, 2013 but apparently my case wasn't good enough for the attorneys who rev[Show More]This iud almost killed me but since it wasn't surgically removed none if the attorneys would take my case. I had to have a complete hysterectomy and open heart surgery to relace my mechanical valve bc the infection caused by the iud went to my heart!! I also had a mild stroke after I was admitted into the hospital on Dec 5, 2013 but apparently my case wasn't good enough for the attorneys who reviewed it? I was in the hospital for a month and missed Christmas with my family! I also had to go home with a pic line in my arm for another month for antibiotics bc the infection was so bad! This product needs to be taken off the market!

  • MichelleJune 22, 2016 at 9:45 pm

    I was dx after the IUD was implanted

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Gardasil Lawsuits Over Failure To Warn Doctors About HPV Vaccine Risks Cleared To Move Forward
Gardasil Lawsuits Over Failure To Warn Doctors About HPV Vaccine Risks Cleared To Move Forward (Posted today)

A federal judge has cleared Gardasil lawsuits to move forward, after paring down plaintiffs' claims to those alleging Merck either failed to warn, or fraudulently concealed, the HPV vaccine's risks from the medical community.