<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Taser Heart Risk Leads to Recommendation to Avoid Chest Shots</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.aboutlawsuits.com/taser-heart-risk-leads-to-new-recommendation-6590/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.aboutlawsuits.com/taser-heart-risk-leads-to-new-recommendation-6590/</link>
	<description>News and Information about Personal Injury Lawsuits</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 15:05:41 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Excited-Delirium.com</title>
		<link>http://www.aboutlawsuits.com/taser-heart-risk-leads-to-new-recommendation-6590/comment-page-1/#comment-10315</link>
		<dc:creator>Excited-Delirium.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.aboutlawsuits.com/?p=6590#comment-10315</guid>
		<description>My taser-critical blog at Excited-Delirium.com (don&#039;t forget the dash!) has a great deal of potentially-useful information on the subject.

My most recent post examines &quot;Why?&quot; would Taser International issue these new guidelines. Their explanation does not balance. My alternate explanation seems to be more rational.

With about 1400 posts examing the issue, feel free to contact me for pointers to information. I&#039;m happy to help.

Everything I post is eventually linked to sources so one can fact check.

And the blog has some unique findings that bridge some of the gaps.

Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My taser-critical blog at Excited-Delirium.com (don&#8217;t forget the dash!) has a great deal of potentially-useful information on the subject.</p>
<p>My most recent post examines &#8220;Why?&#8221; would Taser International issue these new guidelines. Their explanation does not balance. My alternate explanation seems to be more rational.</p>
<p>With about 1400 posts examing the issue, feel free to contact me for pointers to information. I&#8217;m happy to help.</p>
<p>Everything I post is eventually linked to sources so one can fact check.</p>
<p>And the blog has some unique findings that bridge some of the gaps.</p>
<p>Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
