Yamaha Rhino ATV Attorneys Assigned to Leadership Roles in MDL

U.S. District Judge Jennifer Coffman met with the attorneys this week in the recently consolidated Yamaha Rhino ATV litigation, which has been centralized in the Western District of Kentucky. As part of the organization of the multidistrict litigation (MDL), lawyers were appointed to leadership roles to perform certain functions during pretrial proceedings that will benefit plaintiffs in all of the cases.

The MDL was established by the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation last month, as a growing number of Yamaha Rhino rollover lawsuits have been filed in various districts throughout the United States. All of the cases involve similar allegations that the side-by-side ATV contains design defects which make it prone to tip over, causing serious injuries for the occupants.

While the cases are consolidated for purposes of pretrial litigation and discovery, the lawsuits remain individual claims and they will be sent back to the courts where filed for trial if they do not otherwise resolve.

Did You Know?

Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled

Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.

Learn More

At the preliminary status conference held with Judge Coffman on March 24, 2009, 16 attorneys appeared on behalf of plaintiffs who have filed Rhino lawsuits and 10 attorneys appeared on behalf of Yamaha and the other defendants that have been named in the cases.

In an order signed by Judge Coffman, 14 different Yamaha Rhino attorneys were appointed to the various leadership positions on the Plaintiffs’ Steering Committee and Plaintiffs’ Executive Committee, with Jennifer Moore appointed as Plaintiffs’ Liaison Counsel and Elizabeth Cabraser as Plaintiffs’ Lead Counsel.

While the exact duties of the various positions differ from one MDL to another, the attorneys appointed to leadership roles generally represent the interests of all plaintiffs at pretrial proceedings, respond to court inquiries, handle motions applicable to all cases, examine witnesses during depositions and negotiate any potential settlements that may apply across all cases.

Judge Coffman has ordered that a proposal be filed with the Court by March 30, 2009, outlining the structure and responsibilities of the different leadership positions.

The defendants’ and plaintiffs’ lead counsel also need to file proposed confidentiality and case management orders by April 14, 2009.

Image Credit: |

1 Comments

  • SaritaMarch 26, 2012 at 12:21 am

    Correct. We got along just fine in inclement cidnotions with RWD before FWD became the norm (not to mention being more fun). And that was before the electronic traction nannies that we have today. We were drifting in the empty high school parking lots long bfore anyone heard of the term. Snow was just an opportunity for having fun. Why do you think so many people prefer pickup trucks and polic[Show More]Correct. We got along just fine in inclement cidnotions with RWD before FWD became the norm (not to mention being more fun). And that was before the electronic traction nannies that we have today. We were drifting in the empty high school parking lots long bfore anyone heard of the term. Snow was just an opportunity for having fun. Why do you think so many people prefer pickup trucks and police prefer RWD?

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

AT&T Data Breach Lawsuits Seek Damages for 70M Customers Whose Information Was Released
AT&T Data Breach Lawsuits Seek Damages for 70M Customers Whose Information Was Released (Posted today)

AT&T faces a growing number of data breach class action lawsuits, which plaintiffs say should be consolidated before one federal judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings.

Fairness of Philips CPAP Recall Settlement Being Evaluated By MDL Judge
Fairness of Philips CPAP Recall Settlement Being Evaluated By MDL Judge (Posted yesterday)

A federal judge has held a fairness hearing for a proposed Philips CPAP class action lawsuit settlement, which seeks to resolve claims that consumers suffered economic damages due to the massive recall over toxic sound abatement foam.