Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
Actos Bladder Cancer Trial Continues in Federal MDL February 28, 2014 Austin Kirk Add Your Comments Trial continues for the first federal Actos bladder cancer lawsuit to go before a jury, but the court will recess this afternoon until March 10 due to Mardi Gras. The jury in Lafayette, Louisiana has heard three weeks of testimony from medical experts, former Takeda Pharmaceuticals employees and a former head of the FDA, in a case brought by a previous user of the diabetes drug who alleges that inadequate warnings were provided about the risk of bladder cancer from Actos. Trial began on February 3 in a case brought by Terrance Allen, which was selected as the first “bellwether” trial in the federal multidistrict litigation (MDL), which involves nearly 3,000 bladder cancer lawsuits filed by former users of Actos. The case is the first of a series of trials designed to help the parties gauge how juries may respond to similar evidence and testimony that is likely to be repeated throughout the litigation. Learn More About Actos Lawsuit Side effects of Actos may increase the risk of bladder cancer. Lawsuits are pending nationwide. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About Actos Lawsuit Side effects of Actos may increase the risk of bladder cancer. Lawsuits are pending nationwide. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Just days before the trial began, U.S. District Judge Rebecca Doherty ruled that Takeda acted in bad faith during the Actos litigation discovery process, ordering that juries can be told that the drug maker hid or destroyed information that should have been preserved for the cases. The first witness called to the stand by the plaintiffs was Stacey Calahan, Assistant General County for Takeda, who testified regarding the spoliation of evidence issues. Her testimony was followed by that of Dr. David Kessler, a former head of the FDA, who told the jury about how new drugs are introduced to the market and about what Takeda Pharmaceuticals was required to do and tell the federal drug regulatory agency about Actos. Kessler has been followed by a number of medical experts who testified about the science that links Actos and bladder cancer, as well as personnel from Takeda Pharmaceuticals. Some of the testimony was presented to the jury via live satellite transmission, allowing witnesses who could not come to Lafayette to still be questioned and cross-examined live. Normally, attorneys would have been required to take video depositions of witnesses unavailable to appear live at trial. However, Judge Doherty allowed use of the cutting-edge technology to present real-time testimony from witnesses who were subpoenaed to appear at other federal district courts. In addition to live transition of video and sound, interaction with dozens of documents was possible through the use of ELMO document cameras. It was originally expected that the plaintiffs would take about 20 days to put on their case, after which attorneys for Takeda have indicated that it will take about another 11 days for the defense. The drug maker argues that there is no evidence establishing that Actos causes bladder cancer, and it maintains that Allen’s cancer was caused by something else. Actos Litigation Actos (pioglitazone) is a type 2 diabetes drug that has been used by millions of Americans. However, concerns emerged in 2010 about a potential link between Actos and bladder cancer. In addition to cases pending before Judge Doherty in the Actos MDL, a large number of cases have been filed in various state courts throughout the country. At least three trials have already taken place at the state level, with conflicting results. In May 2013, a California jury awarded $6.5 million in damages over Actos bladder cancer in a case brought by Jack Cooper, who was given an expedited trial date due to his grave health. However, following post-trial motions, that verdict was reversed after the state court judge excluded the plaintiffs’ expert witness testimony. A second trial was held in Maryland state court in September 2013, which resulted in a jury finding that Takeda failed to adequately warn about the risk of bladder cancer from Actos and awarding $1.77 million in damages. However, the case resulted in a defense verdict for the drug maker under a unique Maryland law, known as contributory negligence, as the jury also found that the plaintiff failed to exercise reasonable care for his own health, which nullified the negligence of the drug maker. A third Actos bladder cancer trial recently concluded in Nevada state court, which resulted in a defense verdict after the jury determined that both Actos and the plaintiff’s history as a smoker contributed to the development of bladder cancer. In that case, the plaintiff also ordered generic versions of Actos from online pharmacies, which raised questions as to whether Actos or unknown factors in the generic versions purchased online could have contributed to the development of the disease in that case. Following a series of bellwether trials that are scheduled in the federal MDL, if Takeda fails to reach Actos settlement agreements to resolve a large portion of the litigation, Judge Doherty may begin remanding hundreds of individual cases back to the U.S. District Courts where they were originally filed for separate trial dates throughout the country. Tags: Actos, Actos Bladder Cancer, Bladder Cancer, Cancer, Diabetes, Diabetes Drug, Takeda Pharmaceutials Image Credit: | More Actos Lawsuit Stories Actos Bladder Cancer Warnings Updated by FDA to Add New Study Data Reviewed December 13, 2016 Bladder Cancer Risk with Actos Highlighted in a New Study April 5, 2016 Actos Side Effects May Increase Risk of Bone Fractures, Weight Gain: Study March 1, 2016 1 Comments angelo March 27, 2014 how about the additional damage of people wanting to take out life ins. policies but being denied because opf the bladder cancer diagnoses and the people who passed on leaving there familkies with no insurance because of the diagnones Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermEmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES MDL Judge Orders Paraquat Lawsuit Settlement Update By June 11, 2025 (Posted: today) A federal judge has agreed to stay all case-specific discovery deadlines in Paraquat lawsuits, while the parties work to hammer out a settlement agreement to resolve thousands of claims. MORE ABOUT: PARAQUAT PARKINSON’S DISEASE LAWSUITSParaquat Settlement Reached for Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Filed in MDL (04/16/2025)Appeals Court Urged To Reinstate Paraquat Lawsuits Previously Set for Bellwether Trials (02/14/2025)Paraquat Lawsuits Over Parkinson’s Disease Risk Set for Trial in October 2025, April 2026 (01/29/2025) Court Outlines Requirements for Depo-Provera Lawsuit Proof of Use, Type of Meningioma Tumor (Posted: yesterday) As new Depo-Provera lawsuits continue to be filed, the judge presiding over the litigation has established key criteria for establishing proof of Depo-Provera use and medical documentation confirming a meningioma diagnosis. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo Shot Lawsuit Filed Over Serious Brain Tumor Injuries (05/07/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera Migraines, Headaches Led to Meningioma Brain Tumor Diagnosis (05/01/2025)Depo-Provera Hearing Loss Lawsuit Filed Over Brain Tumor Side Effects (04/22/2025) BioZorb Implant Lawsuit Alleges Tissue Marker Caused Swelling, Fluid Buildup and Chronic Pain (Posted: 2 days ago) A Massachusetts woman’s injuries from a failed tissue marker that was recently recalled led to the need for physical therapy, according to a BioZorb implant lawsuit. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITFour Women File BioZorb Lawsuit Over Breast Tissue Marker Failures and Injuries (05/05/2025)Lawsuit Claims BioZorb Marker Caused Chronic Pain, Multiple Surgeries After Lumpectomy (04/14/2025)Four BioZorb Breast Tissue Marker Lawsuits Selected for Bellwether Trials (04/02/2025)
MDL Judge Orders Paraquat Lawsuit Settlement Update By June 11, 2025 (Posted: today) A federal judge has agreed to stay all case-specific discovery deadlines in Paraquat lawsuits, while the parties work to hammer out a settlement agreement to resolve thousands of claims. MORE ABOUT: PARAQUAT PARKINSON’S DISEASE LAWSUITSParaquat Settlement Reached for Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Filed in MDL (04/16/2025)Appeals Court Urged To Reinstate Paraquat Lawsuits Previously Set for Bellwether Trials (02/14/2025)Paraquat Lawsuits Over Parkinson’s Disease Risk Set for Trial in October 2025, April 2026 (01/29/2025)
Court Outlines Requirements for Depo-Provera Lawsuit Proof of Use, Type of Meningioma Tumor (Posted: yesterday) As new Depo-Provera lawsuits continue to be filed, the judge presiding over the litigation has established key criteria for establishing proof of Depo-Provera use and medical documentation confirming a meningioma diagnosis. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo Shot Lawsuit Filed Over Serious Brain Tumor Injuries (05/07/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera Migraines, Headaches Led to Meningioma Brain Tumor Diagnosis (05/01/2025)Depo-Provera Hearing Loss Lawsuit Filed Over Brain Tumor Side Effects (04/22/2025)
BioZorb Implant Lawsuit Alleges Tissue Marker Caused Swelling, Fluid Buildup and Chronic Pain (Posted: 2 days ago) A Massachusetts woman’s injuries from a failed tissue marker that was recently recalled led to the need for physical therapy, according to a BioZorb implant lawsuit. MORE ABOUT: BIOZORB LAWSUITFour Women File BioZorb Lawsuit Over Breast Tissue Marker Failures and Injuries (05/05/2025)Lawsuit Claims BioZorb Marker Caused Chronic Pain, Multiple Surgeries After Lumpectomy (04/14/2025)Four BioZorb Breast Tissue Marker Lawsuits Selected for Bellwether Trials (04/02/2025)