Centralization of Eliquis Bleeding Cases To Be Considered By MDL Panel

The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has scheduled oral arguments for late next month, to consider whether to centralize and consolidate all Eliquis lawsuits filed by individuals who allege the blood thinner caused them to suffer severe, uncontrollable bleeding problems. 

In recent months, a growing number of product liability lawsuits have been brought against Bristol-Myers Squibb and Pfizer Inc., alleging that they failed to disclose the risk of bleeding problems associated with their new generation anticoagulant.

There are currently at least 34 complaints pending in 13 different U.S. District Courts nationwide, each involving similar claims that the drug makers failed to adequately warn consumers and the medical community about the side effects of Eliquis, and the lack of an effective reversal agent that would allow doctors to stop bleeding that may develop among users.

Did You Know?

Change Healthcare Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Change Healthcare data breach exposed the names, social security numbers, medical and personal information of potentially 100 million Americans, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Eliquis is part of a new crop of oral anticoagulants introduced in recent years, known as factor xa medications, which also include the blockbuster treatments Xarelto and Pradaxa. The drugs have been aggressively marketed as a replacement for Coumadin (warfarin), which has been the go-to anticoagulation treatment for decades. However, unlike warfarin, these new drugs had no safe and effective antidote available when they were introduced, and a large number of bleeding problems with Eliquis, Xarelto and Pradaxa have been reported in recent years.

Thousands of Xarelto lawsuits and Pradaxa lawsuits have already been filed against the makers of these competing, and more popular, anticoagulants. Separate MDLs, or multidistrict litiations have previously been established by the U.S. JPML for cases involving these other factor xa medication.

While a relatively small number of Eliquis cases have been filed to date, it is expected that the number of complaints will continue to increase in the coming weeks and months, likely involving hundreds, or even thousands, of cases involving severe bleeds or wrongful death.

In a motion to transfer (PDF) filed with the JPML on October 13, Bristol -Myers Squibb and Pfizer Inc. requested that all Eliquis complaints filed in U.S. District Courts nationwide be consolidated before one judge to prevent duplicative discovery into common issues in the cases, avoid contradictory rulings from different judges, and to serve the convenience of the parties, witnesses and the judicial system.

In a hearing order (PDF) issued on December 15, the JPML set oral arguments for January 26, 2017 at the Wilkie D. Ferguson, Jr. United States Courthouse in Miami, Florida.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Suboxone Film Lawsuit Highlights How Dental Decay Problems Continue To Be Reported Even After Label Change
Suboxone Film Lawsuit Highlights How Dental Decay Problems Continue To Be Reported Even After Label Change (Posted today)

Updated warnings issued in June 2022 failed to adequately convey Suboxone’s risks of tooth decay, which has resulted in continuing reports of dental problems among users of the film strips, lawsuit indicates.