Ethicon Transvaginal Mesh Complications Result in $13.5M Verdict at Trial in Philadelphia

|

A Philadelphia jury has awarded $13.5 million in damages to a woman who suffered severe and debilitating complications after an Ethicon transvaginal mesh product moved out of position. 

The verdict was handed down in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas on Wednesday, marking the second state court vaginal mesh lawsuit over the past three months to result in a multi-million dollar damage award against Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon subsidiary.

The manufacturer faces nearly 50,000 similar claims brought by women throughout the United States, each involving allegations that the mesh used for repair of pelvic organ prolapse or female stress urinary incontinence migrated through the vagina, caused infections and other painful injuries.

|
|

Following a two week trial involving a case filed by Sharon Carlino, the jury awarded $3.5 million in compensatory damages and hit the Johnson & Johnson subsidiary with an additional $10 million in punitive damages, which is designed to punish the medical device manufacturer for their actions involving the manufacture and sale of the mesh product.

In December, another Philadelphia jury awarded $12.5 million in damages in a case filed by Patricia Hammons, including $7 million in punitive damages.

While there have been some recent reports suggesting that Ethicon is attempting to settle some vaginal mesh cases, additional trials are expected over the coming year if the manufacturer fails to resolve the litigation.

Other manufacturers of similar products have agreed to pay hundreds of millions in vaginal mesh settlements to resolve claims, and Bloomberg News reports that Johnson & Johnson has set aside more than $1 billion to deal with the claims.

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.

Image Credit: |



0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A federal judge has scheduled a series of Bard PowerPort trials between April 2026 and February 2027, which will focus on allegations that defective design flaws made the devices susceptible to infections, fractures and migration.
A federal judge is calling for dozens of attorneys to reapply for leadership positions in Depo-Provera brain tumor litigation before their appointments expire in March.