Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
Generic Drug Makers’ Push Back Against Warning Requirements February 20, 2014 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments In response to proposed regulations that would make generic drug makers responsible for providing complete and updated label warnings about potential health risks associated with medications they manufacture and sell, the generic manufacturers are pushing back and indicate that it would cause confusion and increased costs. Generic drug manufactuers have released a new economic analysis (PDF) of the costs associated with forcing them to adequately warn consumers about drug side effects, which may also restore the ability for consumers to pursue failure to warn lawsuits against generic drug makers when they suffer injuries that may have been prevented had appropriate warnings been provided. The pharmaceutical companies are pushing back against a proposed FDA rule that would close a loophole created by the Supreme Court, which has allowed generic drug makers to avoid responsibility for injuries caused by medications they sell, even if they are aware the drugs contain dangerous side effects that are not adequately disclosed to consumers and the medical community. Do You Know about… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Currently regulations require that generic drugs contain the same warning label that is provided on the brand name version of the medication, even if the manufacturer knows or reasonably should know that serious health risks associated with the drugs are not disclosed by the brand name manufacturer. This has caused many older drugs to be sold for years after potentially life-threatening health problems are discovered, especially when brand name versions are no longer manufactured. Generic drug makers have relied on this restriction on their ability to update warnings as a shield against product liability lawsuits filed by consumers who allege they suffered an injury due to their failure to warn about known side effects. Known as pre-emption, the Supreme Court upheld this defense in the controversial 2011 ruling of Pliva v. Mensing, in which a split court ruled 5-4 down ideological lines that state failure to warn lawsuits are preempted by the federal regulations that require generic drugs contain the same warnings. The impact of this ruling has left consumers without a recourse for serious and often devastating injuries caused by medications with known side effects that are no disclosed by the drug makers. Consumers are unable to pursue damages against the brand name manufacturers since they did not use their product, and any failure to warn lawsuits against generic drug makers are now barred. This has resulted in the dismissal of hundreds of Reglan lawsuits, Accutane lawsuits, Fosamax lawsuits and other claims where the plaintiffs only used the generic equivalent. The new proposed FDA regulations would allow generic drug makers to update label warnings and safety information for their drugs, but the industry says such a move would be a mistake. According to a press release issued by the Generic Pharmaceutical Association, the industry representatives have indicated that holding pharmaceutical manufacturers responsible for updating warnings about known risks “would be nothing short of catastrophic.” The Generic Pharmaceutical Association had a consulting form known as Matrix Global Advisors conduct an analysis of the cost of the new rule, which claims that it would add $4 billion to the cost of national healthcare. The association claims that they would be forced to make consumers pay more for their drugs if they were made liable for providing adequate drug side effect warning. They also claim the rule would lead to multiple drug labels for the same drugs, causing confusion among consumers. The generic drug makers indicate that another solution, one that does not require them to be held liable for warning patients about the side effects of their drugs, would be more sensible. However, the FDA rejected those arguments in its proposed rulemaking. While generic companies claim the rule would allow them to change the labels without FDA approval, the FDA says that its new rules would include FDA review and approval of those label changes. The position taken by the generic drug makers also does not account for the huge costs associated with the injuries caused by generic drugs, which may be avoided if proper warnings are provided. However, the generic drug makers prefer to continue generating profits from their medications without being responsible for the safety of consumers. In August 2011, the prominent consumer advocacy group Public Citizen filed a petition with the FDA calling for the agency to amend the federal regulations that limit generic drug makers’ ability to update warning labels. The group indicated that the outdated regulations prevent consumers from learning about many known risks associated with generic drugs and has become a shield for pharmaceutical companies against product liability lawsuits. Tags: Drug Side Effects, Generic Drug, Supreme Court More Lawsuit Stories Lawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera DMPA Injection Increases Brain Tumor Risks June 20, 2025 Retired Talcum Powder Judge May Be Appointed To Address Renewed Expert Motions June 20, 2025 New Study Links Ultra-Processed Foods Intake With Multiple Adverse Health Effects June 20, 2025 1 Comments Patricia March 14, 2014 If generics are supposed to be the same as the brand, why is this different labeling necessary. It is just another way for Brand Manufacturers to cause problems for the generic manufacturers. I have a question, why are certain 20 and 30 year old generic’s prices being raised 20 to 30%. This will cause senior citizens to go into the “doughnut” hole sooner. What happened to medicine getting cheaper as it gets older. The FDA seems to let drug companies get away with anything. Are you there for them or the consumer? Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermPhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Lawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera DMPA Injection Increases Brain Tumor Risks (Posted: today) A Depo-Provera lawsuit blames the active ingredient, DMPA, for an increased risk of the development of brain tumors. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITOrtho-Cept, Similar Birth Control Pills Linked to Intracranial Meningioma Risks, Study Warns (06/17/2025)Status of Depo-Provera Shot Lawsuits Outlined by MDL Judge (06/13/2025)Pfizer Requests Depo-Provera Lawsuit Coordination as Mass Tort in Pennsylvania State Court (06/10/2025) Zantac Cancer Lawsuits Continue To Be Filed More Than 5 Years After Recall (Posted: 2 days ago) A man diagnosed with multiple forms of cancer has filed a Zantac lawsuit, blaming Boehringer Ingelheim for failing to adequately warn about the recalled heartburn drug’s health risks. MORE ABOUT: ZANTAC CANCER LAWSUITSJury Hears Zantac Cancer Evidence in Illinois Trial Against Boehringer Ingelheim (02/05/2025)Zantac Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Trial Ends With Hung Jury in California (11/22/2024)GSK To Pay $2.2 Billion To Settle Zantac Cancer Lawsuits Brought by 80,000 Consumers (10/10/2024) Enfamil NEC Lawsuit Filed After Newborn Suffers ‘Nearly Total Bowel Necrosis’ (Posted: 3 days ago) Necrotizing enterocolitis caused by Enfamil resulted in a newborn suffering life-long bowel injuries, according to a lawsuit filed by his mother. MORE ABOUT: ENFAMIL AND SIMILAC BABY FORMULA LAWSUITReckitt Benckiser Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Enfamil NEC Risks (06/12/2025)NEC Infant Formula Lawyers To Meet With MDL Judge Following Dismissal of First Bellwether Trial (05/29/2025)FDA To Investigate Whether Infant Formula Products Provide Enough Nutrition (05/16/2025)
Lawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera DMPA Injection Increases Brain Tumor Risks (Posted: today) A Depo-Provera lawsuit blames the active ingredient, DMPA, for an increased risk of the development of brain tumors. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITOrtho-Cept, Similar Birth Control Pills Linked to Intracranial Meningioma Risks, Study Warns (06/17/2025)Status of Depo-Provera Shot Lawsuits Outlined by MDL Judge (06/13/2025)Pfizer Requests Depo-Provera Lawsuit Coordination as Mass Tort in Pennsylvania State Court (06/10/2025)
Zantac Cancer Lawsuits Continue To Be Filed More Than 5 Years After Recall (Posted: 2 days ago) A man diagnosed with multiple forms of cancer has filed a Zantac lawsuit, blaming Boehringer Ingelheim for failing to adequately warn about the recalled heartburn drug’s health risks. MORE ABOUT: ZANTAC CANCER LAWSUITSJury Hears Zantac Cancer Evidence in Illinois Trial Against Boehringer Ingelheim (02/05/2025)Zantac Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Trial Ends With Hung Jury in California (11/22/2024)GSK To Pay $2.2 Billion To Settle Zantac Cancer Lawsuits Brought by 80,000 Consumers (10/10/2024)
Enfamil NEC Lawsuit Filed After Newborn Suffers ‘Nearly Total Bowel Necrosis’ (Posted: 3 days ago) Necrotizing enterocolitis caused by Enfamil resulted in a newborn suffering life-long bowel injuries, according to a lawsuit filed by his mother. MORE ABOUT: ENFAMIL AND SIMILAC BABY FORMULA LAWSUITReckitt Benckiser Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Enfamil NEC Risks (06/12/2025)NEC Infant Formula Lawyers To Meet With MDL Judge Following Dismissal of First Bellwether Trial (05/29/2025)FDA To Investigate Whether Infant Formula Products Provide Enough Nutrition (05/16/2025)