Lawsuit Alleges Diminished Quality of Life from Propecia Side Effects

A 24-year old man has filed a lawsuit suing Merck, alleging that he suffered permanent sexual dysfunction and a substantially diminished quality of life as a result of the side effects of Propecia, a prescription medication sold for treatment of male-pattern hair loss.

The Propecia lawsuit was filed by Paul Blankenship on March 12, in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey.

According to allegations raised in the complaint, Blankenship began taking Propecia in February 2011, when he was 23, to restore hair loss and improve his quality of life. After using the prescription medication for only about nine months, he indicates that he has been left with permanent erectile dysfunction, impotence, emotional and cognitive impairment, which has affected both his personal and professional life.

Did You Know?

Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled

Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.

Learn More

Blankenship is one of a growing number of men in the U.S. who have filed a product liability lawsuit over Propecia sexual side effects, alleging that Merck failed to adequately warn men in the United States that they may suffer long-term impotence and infertility from Propecia.

Warnings provided to consumers and the medical community in the United States suggest that erectile dysfunction and other sexual problems that may occur with Propecia are temporary and resolve after men stop taking the drug.  However, the drug carries stronger warnings in a number of other countries, providing information about reports of persistent erectile dysfunction, which have continued in some men even after the medication is discontinued.

Propecia (finasteride) is approved for the treatment of male pattern baldness. It is a low-dose version of Proscar, approved in 1992 for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Recently, Merck took down their dedicated web site for Propecia, leading some to wonder whether the company may be revising the warning label or even considering a Propecia recall.

For more than a month, Merck has displayed a message on their Propecia.com website, indicating that the “website is not currently available”, providing links to the current prescribing information, patient product information, the Propecia Persistence Program and a link encouraging visitors to report any negative side effects of Propecia to the FDA’s MedWatch program.

On March 29, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation is scheduled to hear arguments over whether the Propecia litigation should be consolidated before one judge for pretrial proceedings. Dozens of lawsuits have already been filed, and some expect that hundreds of additional complaints will be brought in the coming year by otherwise health young men have experience sexual dysfunction and damage to their quality of life.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

AT&T Data Breach Lawsuits Seek Damages for 70M Customers Whose Information Was Released
AT&T Data Breach Lawsuits Seek Damages for 70M Customers Whose Information Was Released (Posted today)

AT&T faces a growing number of data breach class action lawsuits, which plaintiffs say should be consolidated before one federal judge for coordinated pretrial proceedings.

Fairness of Philips CPAP Recall Settlement Being Evaluated By MDL Judge
Fairness of Philips CPAP Recall Settlement Being Evaluated By MDL Judge (Posted yesterday)

A federal judge has held a fairness hearing for a proposed Philips CPAP class action lawsuit settlement, which seeks to resolve claims that consumers suffered economic damages due to the massive recall over toxic sound abatement foam.