Leiomyosarcoma Cancer Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed Over Hysterectomy Surgical Device

Nouvag USA and Richard Wolf Medical Instruments Corp. face a wrongful death lawsuit filed by a Virginia man who alleges that his wife died of leiomyosarcoma due to a hysterectomy surgical device manufactured and distributed by the two companies, which caused the aggressive uterine cancer to be rapidly spread throughout her body. 

Jeffery Wilson filed the complaint (PDF) in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois on December 28, on behalf of himself, and his late wife, Marguerite Wilson, who died on New Year’s Eve in 2013 from advanced-stage leiomyosarcoma cancer that was diagnosed following a hysterectomy where morcellation was performed.

Power morcellators are surgical devices used during minimally invasive hysterectomy and myomectomy procedures, allowing surgeons to cut up and remove the uterus or uterine fibroids through a small incision in the abdomen. However, a number of manufacturers of these hysterectomy surgical devices now face lawsuits alleging they are unreasonably dangerous, since they may cause hidden cancers contained within the uterus to be spread throughout the abdomen.

Learn More About

Morcellation Lawsuits

Power morcellators used during a laparoscopic hysterectomy or uterine fibroid surgery may cause the spread of aggressive cancer.

Learn More About this Lawsuit SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

According to the leiomyosarcoma wrongful death lawsuit, Marguerite Wilson underwent a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy on December 17, 2012. During the procedure, a Morce Power Plus Morcellator, manufactured and distributed by Nouvag and Richard Wolf, was used to grind up and extract the tissues.

Prior to the procedure, Wilson indicates that there was no evidence that his wife had disseminated or metastatic cancer. Marguerite Wilson underwent a mammogram and regular pap smears before the procedure, all of which were benign, and her doctors were unaware of the uterine sarcoma hidden within her uterus, and had no way to detect it.

The lawsuit alleges that the hysterectomy surgical device caused the contained cancer cells to be spread throughout her body, resulting in advanced stage leiomyosarcoma. Wilson underwent severe pain and debilitating cancer treatments before she died just a year later.

“After the surgery, a pathology report showed leiomyosarcoma in the morcellated tissue,” the lawsuit states. “As a result of the morcellation and upstaging of the leiomyosarcoma, Ms. Wilson then endured the horrible pain of radiation treatment, additional painful surgery and treatment, and the fear of dying until she died on December 31, 2013.”

Morcellator Cancer Lawsuits

The case is one of a growing number of power morcellator cancer lawsuits being filed on behalf of female cancer survivors and the relatives of women who died after unsuspected uterine sarcomas were spread by the surgical device during a hysterectomy or uterine fibroid removal.

To date, most of the complaints have been filed against Johnson & Johnson’s Ethicon subsidiary, which was the leading manufacturer of the devices before the company decided to stop making morcellators because there was no way to make them safe.

Each of the lawsuits involve similar allegations that the manufacturers knew or should have known about the risk that laparoscopic morcellation may disseminate uterine cancer, yet failed to adequately warn the medical community or women deciding to undergo a minimally invasive procedure instead of a traditional hysterectomy or myomectomy.

The litigation has emerged since April 2014, when the FDA estimated that one out of every 350 women undergoing surgery for symptomatic uterine fibroids may actually have undiagnosed and unsuspected sarcoma contained within the uterus. For these women, morcellators may rapidly spread cancerous cells throughout the body, rapidly upstaging leiomyosarcoma, endometrial stromal sarcoma or other uterine cancers to an advanced stage that is difficult to treat and often fatal.

Two FDA advisory panels were convened by the agency, which determined that there was no safe way to use power morcellators for uterine fibroid removal. However, the panels could not agree on whether to recommend that the agency demand a power morcellator recall or simply add a black box warning.

While the FDA has allowed laparoscopic morcellators to remain on the market, with much stronger warnings about the potential cancer risks, many hospitals and doctors have announced that they will no longer perform hysterectomy or myomectomy procedures with morcellation, indicating that there is no way to justify the risk.

Image Credit: |

1 Comments

  • JenniferMarch 3, 2022 at 8:55 pm

    My mother died in 2005 after having a hysterectomy where they found Leiomyosarcoma. We were told it was so advanced because the tumor had “infarcted”. MDAnderson wanted her to come and do an experimental treatment. Once there they told us “it spread during surgery, it wasn’t because it infarcted. They didn’t know it was there and the cells got out…it was a mess and spread.” We didn’t know what [Show More]My mother died in 2005 after having a hysterectomy where they found Leiomyosarcoma. We were told it was so advanced because the tumor had “infarcted”. MDAnderson wanted her to come and do an experimental treatment. Once there they told us “it spread during surgery, it wasn’t because it infarcted. They didn’t know it was there and the cells got out…it was a mess and spread.” We didn’t know what that meant at the time. I have told the story a million times. To us it sounded like a tumor just popped and blood was everywhere, it was surgery after all. But it hasn’t say well for 17 years. Two nights ago I began reading…I found you and learned about what really happened. I firmly believe they knew back then their device should be pulled. I believe the proof can still be found because MDAnderson studied my mom’s case.

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Third Track of Camp Lejeune Illnesses and Diseases To Be Selected For Case Specific Workup
Third Track of Camp Lejeune Illnesses and Diseases To Be Selected For Case Specific Workup (Posted today)

The U.S. government has proposed claims of esophageal cancer, miscarriage, dental side effects, and hypersensitivity skin disorder be used for a third batch of potential Camp Lejeune bellwether lawsuits.