Pittsburgh Medical Malpractice Lawsuit Results in $2.3M Verdict

  • Written by: AboutLawsuits
  • 1 Comment

A woman from the Pittsburgh metro area has been awarded $2.3 million award in a medical malpractice lawsuit that was against at local hospital for failing to diagnose an infection.

The Pennsylvania malpractice lawsuit was filed by Vita Monestersky against Uniontown Hospital in the U.S. District Court of the Western District of Pennsylvania.

The complaint alleged that the hospital staff was negligent for failing to give Monestersky’s doctor the results of a blood test that revealed an alarming increase in her white blood cell count after she gave birth. It was later discovered that she had a Strep A infection and required a complete abdominal hysterectomy to save her life.

Monestersky’s gynecologist ordered the blood test from the Uniontown Hospital after she gave birth. The laboratory found a sudden and dramatic increase in white blood cells, but never reported those results to her physician.

The hospital malpractice lawsuit claimed that there was a lack of policies and procedures in place to ensure that the doctor received the white blood cell count information.

Monestersky was only 18 at the time of the hysterectomy in November 2004.

The jury awarded the plaintiff $2.3 million in damages and rejected defense arguments that the elevated white blood count was common after childbirth and was not a significant sign of infection. Her physician testified that if he had been given the test results, he would have been able to treat the infection before it required that she undergo a hysterectomy.

Tags: , , , ,

1 comment

  1. Joseph Reply

    I also share the wonder how a hospital staff can be so lax, I had a neck fusion on 1/16/13 & the surgery dept had lost a 1/4 in piece of heplock catheter in my veins & said to me & others that \”I would cough it out\” ….,so i do understand the feeling that is endured due to my own deception

  • Share Your Comments

  • Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

    Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.
  • NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.