Less than 25% of Hospitals Turn Over Infection Data to CDC

Less than a quarter of hospitals in the U.S. are reporting data on hospital-acquired infections and many facilities may not know how many infections occur in their hospitals, according to a new report by the federal government.  

Last week, the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention’s (CDC) issued a report on hospital infections, which revealed information about substantial gaps in hospital reporting rates.

The survey was focused on central line-associated blood stream infections (CLABSIs), which are infections resulting from central line catheters and most frequently affect severely ill patients. The CDC predicts that CLABSIs are responsible for about 1/3 of all hospital-acquired infection deaths in the U.S. each year.

Did You Know?

Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled

Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.

Learn More

While the data gleaned from hospitals indicate that the rate of infection was lower than expected, only 24% of hospitals actually turned in infection rate data to the CDC. Only 17 states mandate that hospitals report on hospital-acquired infections, and only five of those states actually validate the information is accurate through their own state health departments.

The survey was the first time CDC gathered self-reported information from hospitals. The data it did collect was limited to a six-month initial reporting period, and CDC researchers say that as the survey is performed annually and more hospitals report more reliable information, the CDC’s knowledge of infection rates will improve.

The CDC reports that there are more than 2 million hospital infections acquired each year, resulting in about 90,000 deaths annually. Another 1.5 million long term care and nursing home infections occur every year.

In recent years, there has been an increasing number of hospital infection lawsuits filed throughout the United States, as experts believe that most of these potentially life-threatening infections in hospitals can be prevented if steps are taken by the facility and staff.

These steps could include improved methods of handling catheter during insertion, leaving them in for shorter periods and improved hygiene. Many hospitals have instituted new rules to ensure that hands are washed and increased efforts are being taken to keep areas lie the ICU more sterile and catheters clean.

Image Credit: |

2 Comments

  • CarolMarch 25, 2011 at 5:40 pm

    Amazing comment by Jack and still by no means surprising. I was denied both assessment and treatment before being dismissed from a major teaching hospital -- there for a surgery for a wrong-diagnosis lung cancer. I ended up admitted elsewhere within hours for extensive antibiotic treatment. They told me that I was "lucky I didn't have cancer". I think I'd reply given the outcome and what manife[Show More]Amazing comment by Jack and still by no means surprising. I was denied both assessment and treatment before being dismissed from a major teaching hospital -- there for a surgery for a wrong-diagnosis lung cancer. I ended up admitted elsewhere within hours for extensive antibiotic treatment. They told me that I was "lucky I didn't have cancer". I think I'd reply given the outcome and what manifestly worsened, I'm lucky they didn't kill me.

  • JackAugust 1, 2010 at 1:27 am

    My wife went in for a "simple" procedure. But one week later we get a call from doctors asst. saying get wife to hospital asap. I ask why? She says she has a bug, I say what kind? She answers a bad one. I ask for name and she does not want to give me the information. I get info after pressing her and asking for the doctor, I ask her to spell it out. I take wife to hospital and they say wife is b[Show More]My wife went in for a "simple" procedure. But one week later we get a call from doctors asst. saying get wife to hospital asap. I ask why? She says she has a bug, I say what kind? She answers a bad one. I ask for name and she does not want to give me the information. I get info after pressing her and asking for the doctor, I ask her to spell it out. I take wife to hospital and they say wife is being admitted due to "abcess" I spent two hours online before taking her in and everything I read said it was a life threatning bacteria, found out she had aquired 3 separate bacteria. I knew they were all nosocomial, but I ask doc how she aquired them, one said from her own poop, other said from abcess that she had inside. We find out she did not have abcess before simple procedure, so instead of being 300 milesfrom home for 4-5 days we were 39 days while they fumbled her care, but the most concerning thing was the lack of knowledge on doctors part, I looked up that there are 31 types of acinteobacter, doctor state there is only one type. Plus they never ran any blood work for bac. was all around disappointing experience that nearly cost my wife her life.

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Third Track of Camp Lejeune Illnesses and Diseases To Be Selected For Case Specific Workup
Third Track of Camp Lejeune Illnesses and Diseases To Be Selected For Case Specific Workup (Posted yesterday)

The U.S. government has proposed claims of esophageal cancer, miscarriage, dental side effects, and hypersensitivity skin disorder be used for a third batch of potential Camp Lejeune bellwether lawsuits.