Recall of Actos Not Recommended in Europe, Despite Bladder Cancer Risk

  • Written by: Staff Writers

European drug regulators indicate that they are not recommending an Actos recall, even though the diabetes drug has been linked to an increased risk of bladder cancer. Instead, doctors have been urged to only use Actos as a second or third line of defense for diabetics.

The European Medicines Agency (EMA) issued a clarification of its stance on the safety concerns for Actos on October 21, indicating that the drug is still a valid diabetes treatment. However, due to the Actos bladder cancer risk, it should only be used when other treatments have failed.

The statement is meant to add clarity to the July opinion by the EMA’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP), which confirmed that the side effects of Actos include a risk of bladder cancer.

CHMP determined that while there was a risk of bladder cancer, there are still some diabetes patients for whom the risk was appropriate because other drugs fail to bring their diabetes under control. The committee recommended careful screening of patients being prescribed the drug and close monitoring while they are on Actos to watch for signs of bladder cancer. The European Commission still has to agree to adopt the opinion as a decision.

Actos (pioglitazone) was introduced as a treatment option for type 2 diabetes in July, 1999. Until recently, it was Takeda Pharmaceuticals’ best-selling drug, with sales of $3.4 billion last year.

In June, France required a recall of Actos after a review of public insurance data identified an increased incidence of bladder cancer with Actos use.

FDA officials began reviewing the potential risk of Actos bladder cancer problems in September 2010, after interim data from an on-going 10 year study found that users may face an increased risk the longer they take the drug.

In the United States, new Actos cancer warnings were approved by the FDA in August 2011, indicating that patients who use the drug for more than a year may face an increased risk of bladder cancer.

A growing number of individuals throughout the U.S. are pursuing an Actos bladder cancer lawsuit against Takeda, alleging that the drug maker failed to provide adequate warnings for consumers or the medical community. Many of the complaints indicate that Takeda should have removed Actos from the market, arguing that the risk of bladder cancer outweighs the minimal benefits.

Some estimates suggest that more than 1,000 cases may ultimately be included as part of the Actos litigation. A panel of judges is scheduled to meet on December 1 to decide whether all federal Actos lawsuits should be consolidated as part of an MDL, or multidistrict litigation.

Tags: , , , , , ,


  1. Lisa Reply

    I do think patients , Dr’s and Lawyers need to put things into perspective with regards to Bladder Cancer and Actos. Out of 10,000 patients that took Actos – 3 (three) cases of Bladder Cancer were found. 7 (seven) cases of Bladder Cancer were found in patients that never ever took Actos. !!?? The number one leading cause of Bladder Cancer is SMOKING. Please visit for more clarity. KNOW THE FACTS.

  2. john Reply


    Lost a friend to bladder cancer who coincidentally had diabetes.

    Not sure if the drugs included actos though.

    These things are SO often never enquired into.

    Dead people tell no tales and survivors even if they know of the concerns take NO action.

    Drug companies therefore LITERALLY and PRACTICALLY get away with murder.

    The whistle blower Dr Helen Ge talks of 1 000 psychiatric problems after the proverbial 10 000 take this drug.

    This isn’t simply pandemic or epidemic but decimation of the human race.

    Benefits of billions of dollars for TAKEDA who incidentally defend themselves on actosinfo site.

    Diabetic people take the risk.

    The normal risk benefit equation?

    And 12 years before people discover problems and again Dr Ge talks of LIES by the company which makes one thing SURE.

    Either the company or the WHISTLEBLOWER are LIARS.

  • Share Your Comments

  • Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

    Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.
  • NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.