Bellwether Trials for Tepezza Hearing Damage Lawsuits Set To Begin in April, June, July and September 2026
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
AFFF Lawsuit Exposure to firefighting foam chemicals may result in an increased risk of cancer for firefighters, military and airport personnel.
Paraquat Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuits Exposure to the toxic herbicide Paraquat has been linked to a risk of Parkinson's disease.
Remand of MDL Yamaha Rhino ATV Lawsuits Recommended November 9, 2011 Staff Writers Add Your Comments The federal judge presiding over the consolidated Yamaha Rhino ATV litigation has indicated that it is time to send the cases back to the district court where they were originally filed for trial, after the manufacturer has quietly settled nearly 200 cases and won most of the cases that made it to a jury. In February 2009, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation ordered that all Yamaha Rhino lawsuits filed in federal district courts throughout the United States would be consolidated before U.S. District Judge Jennifer B. Coffman in the Western District of Kentucky for pretrial proceedings. All of the cases involved individuals who suffered serious and sometimes fatal injuries as a result of an ATV accident allegedly caused by design defects with the four-by-four Yamaha Rhino vehicle. Plaintiffs allege that the Yamaha Rhino is prone to rollover, causing serious injuries even when the vehicle is operated at slow speeds on flat surfaces. Do You Know about… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… hair dye cancer lawsuits For Salon Professionals Hair dye lawsuits are being pursued for salon professionals who were routinely exposed to hair dye chemicals and diagnosed with bladder cancer or breast cancer. See if you qualify for a hair dye cancer lawsuit settlement. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION At one time, more than 325 lawsuits over the Yamaha Rhino were consolidated before Judge Coffman, and additional cases were filed in various state courts throughout the United States. However, there are currently only 52 cases left before Judge Coffman in the MDL. In a Suggestion of Remand filed November 7, Judge Coffman indicated that the MDL has run its course and the unresolved cases should be returned back to the court where they were originally filed for individual trials. Although Yamaha has maintained that their off-road vehicle was safely designed and provided adequate warnings and instructions, the company has agreed to pay settlements for Yamaha Rhino accidents in many cases. Legal analysts have suggested that Yamaha pursued a strategy of settling the strongest cases and allowing the lawsuits with the weakest factual basis to proceed to trial, usually involving accidents with underage drivers or the use of alcohol. As a result, the company has successfully defended themselves at trial in all but one case. Before February 2011, Yamaha had reportedly settled with about 30 plaintiffs. Between February and August, another 85 cases were settled, leaving about 166 cases. On August 2, the court was informed another 90 Yamaha lawsuits had been settled as well. In the Suggestion of Remand, Judge Coffman indicated that at this point it is unlikely there will be any more settlements. Among the cases that Yamaha did not settle and allowed to reach a jury, the only plaintiff’s verdict came in May 2010, when a Georgia jury awarded $317,000 in compensation for a leg injury suffered in a Yamaha Rhino accident. In that case, the plaintiff was wearing a seatbelt and was driving at a low speed on level, grassy terrain when the Rhino rolled over. Prior defense verdicts have largely turned on the individual facts and circumstances of each case, with most involving complicating issues such as modifications that were made to the vehicle after it was sold, failure of the plaintiff to use the provided seatbelt, consumption of alcohol around the time of the accident or operation of the ATV by a minor. If the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation agrees to dissolve the federal MDL, the remaining cases would go back to their original districts for resolution, which would be the beginning of the last stages of Yamaha Rhino litigation. Shortly after the Yamaha Rhino ATV was introduced in 2003, a large number of rollover accidents involving the vehicles began to be reported. In September 2006, Yamaha warned owners about the potential risk of Rhino rollover accidents, providing information about what consumers should do if the Rhino begins to tip over. However, critics argue that the Yamaha Rhino is an unstable, unreasonably dangerous vehicle and that the manufacturer failed to take steps that could have made the vehicles safer. In 2009, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) launched an investigation into the vehicle after at least 46 occupant deaths were linked with the Yamaha Rhino. The CPSC then pressured Yamaha to suspend sales of the Yamaha Rhino 450, 660 and 700 models to make safety improvements. Tags: Accident, ATV, Rhino, Yamaha, Yamaha Rhino Image Credit: 2008 Yamaha Rhino 700 More Lawsuit Stories Uterine and Endometrial Cancer Caused by Hair Relaxer Products: Lawsuit March 25, 2025 Bellwether Trials for Tepezza Hearing Damage Lawsuits Set To Begin in April, June, July and September 2026 March 25, 2025 Cases of Persistent Delirium at Nursing Homes Dropped in Recent Years: Study March 25, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Uterine and Endometrial Cancer Caused by Hair Relaxer Products: Lawsuit (Posted: today) A hair relaxer lawsuit claims long-term use of chemical straighteners led to the development of uterine and endometrial cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITSchedule for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trials Outlined by MDL Judge (03/13/2025)Synthetic Braiding Hair Contains Cancer-Causing Chemicals: Consumer Reports (03/05/2025)Hair Relaxer Wrongful Death Lawsuit Links Fatal Endometrial Cancer to Chemical Straightener Use (03/04/2025) Depo-Provera Lawsuit Timeline for Preparing Pilot Trial Cases Outlined by MDL Judge (Posted: yesterday) A federal judge has issued an order outlining the timeline for Depo-Provera lawsuits being prepared for early trials, with discovery set to kickoff this week and the first cases being ready for trial by late 2026 or early 2027. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITWomen Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (03/18/2025)75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025)Depo-Provera Side Effects May Increase Risk of Rare, Severe Blood Clots, Case Report Warns (03/05/2025) Court Urged To Reject Motion To Dismiss Lawsuits Over Ozempic, Mounjaro Gastrointestinal Risks (Posted: 4 days ago) Pushing back against a motion to dismiss, plaintiffs involved in GLP-1 lawsuits say GLP-1 manufacturers intentionally misled the medical community and patients regarding the safety of the diabetes and weight loss drugs. MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITGLP-1 Manufacturers Argue Gastroparesis Lawsuits Should Require Contemporaneous Diagnostic Testing (03/17/2025)Study Suggests There May Not Be a Link Between Ozempic, Mounjaro and Post-Surgery Aspiration Pneumonia (03/12/2025)Ozempic Hair Loss Side Effects Doubled for Users, Study Finds (03/07/2025)
Bellwether Trials for Tepezza Hearing Damage Lawsuits Set To Begin in April, June, July and September 2026 March 25, 2025
Uterine and Endometrial Cancer Caused by Hair Relaxer Products: Lawsuit (Posted: today) A hair relaxer lawsuit claims long-term use of chemical straighteners led to the development of uterine and endometrial cancer. MORE ABOUT: HAIR RELAXER LAWSUITSchedule for Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Bellwether Trials Outlined by MDL Judge (03/13/2025)Synthetic Braiding Hair Contains Cancer-Causing Chemicals: Consumer Reports (03/05/2025)Hair Relaxer Wrongful Death Lawsuit Links Fatal Endometrial Cancer to Chemical Straightener Use (03/04/2025)
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Timeline for Preparing Pilot Trial Cases Outlined by MDL Judge (Posted: yesterday) A federal judge has issued an order outlining the timeline for Depo-Provera lawsuits being prepared for early trials, with discovery set to kickoff this week and the first cases being ready for trial by late 2026 or early 2027. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITWomen Can File Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuits Directly in MDL: Court Order (03/18/2025)75 Lawyers in Depo-Provera Lawsuits Seek MDL Leadership Roles (03/10/2025)Depo-Provera Side Effects May Increase Risk of Rare, Severe Blood Clots, Case Report Warns (03/05/2025)
Court Urged To Reject Motion To Dismiss Lawsuits Over Ozempic, Mounjaro Gastrointestinal Risks (Posted: 4 days ago) Pushing back against a motion to dismiss, plaintiffs involved in GLP-1 lawsuits say GLP-1 manufacturers intentionally misled the medical community and patients regarding the safety of the diabetes and weight loss drugs. MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITGLP-1 Manufacturers Argue Gastroparesis Lawsuits Should Require Contemporaneous Diagnostic Testing (03/17/2025)Study Suggests There May Not Be a Link Between Ozempic, Mounjaro and Post-Surgery Aspiration Pneumonia (03/12/2025)Ozempic Hair Loss Side Effects Doubled for Users, Study Finds (03/07/2025)