Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Lawsuit Over GM Wrongful Death Settlement Remanded Back to State Court July 23, 2014 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsA federal judge has remanded a wrongful death lawsuit against General Motors (GM) back to Georgia state court, in which the family of a woman killed in a Chevy Cobalt is attempting to invalidate a prior settlement agreement reached with the automaker. The family claims that evidence was withheld about ignition switch problems that have been linked to a large number of similar crashes.The complaint (PDF) was filed by the family of Brooke Melton, which originally brought a case against General Motors in 2011, following a 2010 crash in which Melton’s Chevy Cobalt suddenly shut off while she was driving. As a result, Melton lost control off the vehicle and crossed the center line, colliding with another vehicle.According to allegations raised in the complaint, ignition switch problems caused the vehicle to turn off, also preventing the Chevy Cobalt airbags from deploying. Melton suffered a catastrophic brain injury in the accident, which ultimately led to her death at age 29.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONWhile the family previously reached a wrongful death settlement with GM for $5 million, itย is now attempting to rescind that agreement and return the money they previously received. The lawsuit now seeks to reinstate the prior claims, indicating that the automaker fraudulently concealed that they were aware of the ignition switch problems for decades, yet decided to allow the defective and dangerous vehicles to remain on the road.The rescission claim was filed in Georgia state court in April 2014, but was removed to the federal court system by General Motors in June.According to an order (PDF) issued late last week by U.S. District Judge Thomas Thrash, Jr., the case should have remained in state court, and has been remanded for further proceedings on the issue of whether there are adequate grounds to reverse the GM wrongful death settlement and reopen the case.General Motors Ignition Switch Problems Known for YearsSo far this year, General Motors has recalled millions of vehicles due to ignition switch problems, which could cause the vehicles to suddenly shut off if heavy key chains are used or if the ignition is jarred. If this occurs, it can not only cause the driver to lose control of the vehicle, but may prevent airbags from deploying in the event of a crash.General Motors has admitted through congressional and regulatory investigations that it knew about the ignition switch problems for more than a decade. An internal report conducted earlier this year described a a “pattern of incompetence” among employees of GM, where many people knew the vehicles should be recalled but did nothing.Melton’s family maintains that there is clear evidence that GM lied and withheld relevant information in their case, which would have materially affected the nature of that settlement.The family is looking specifically at the testimony of Ray DeGiorgio, the engineer who designed the switch used in the Melton’s Chevy Cobalt. Before the case was settled and before this year’s recalls, DeGiorgio testified under oath in the Melton case that he made no changes to the ignition switches after they went into production. However, documents provided to congress this year by Delphi Automotive, a parts manufacturer, showed that DeGiorgio signed off approval of changes to the switch in 2006, in an attempt to correct the problems that may result in vehicles suddenly shutting off.GM did not provide those documents during the earlier Melton case, which the family’s attorneys say shows that DeGiorgio lied under oath and that GM covered up the ignition switch problem at the time.Other reports have indicated that GM gave the improved ignition switch the same part number as the defective one, knowing that would allow it to slip under the radar of federal regulators.The return of the case to Georgia state court may prove very beneficial for the family, providing a more friendly venue where juries may be more inclined to hand down larger punitive damage awards. In addition, with the onslaught of federal lawsuits over the GM recall, returning the case to Georgia state court may allow the family’s attorneys to speed up the process of conducting additional discovery and depositions.Specifically, attorneys for the family have indicated that they want to depose current GM CEO Mary Barra, Corporate Counsel Michael Milliken, who has taken heavy fire from some members of Congress this week for his role in the recalls, and 15 former GM employees who were fired as a result of the ignition switch scandal.Since the company first announced the GM ignition switch recall in February, the company has recalled 29 million vehicles in all. While most are for various unrelated problems, more than 2.5 million are directly tied to the ignition switch issue affecting various small-sized Chevy, Pontiac and Saturn vehicles. In addition, nine million or more vehicles have been recalled for other ignition switch problems.The automaker has acknowledged that at least 16 deaths and more than 60 accidents may be linked to the problem. However, federal investigators, consumer watchdog groups, and even some GM officials, indicate that the number is likely to climb as more information becomes known. Much of that information may come out in the discovery proceedings involving the GM litigation.It is ultimately expected that thousands of personal injury, wrongful death and consumer class action lawsuits will be brought as a result of accidents caused by the defects and vehicle owners who have suffered economic harm caused by depreciation of their vehicleโs value due to the ignition switches.General Motors has already agreed to provide compensation to injury victims in accidents where airbags failed to deploy, resulting in personal injury or death. A victimโs compensation fund has been established for cases for injuries and deaths among drivers or passengers in one of the recalled vehicles, as well as pedestrians and occupants of other vehicles involved in accidents with recalled GM cars.GM will begin accepting applications for the settlement fund on August 1. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Auto Recall, Chevrolet Cobalt, General Motors (GM), Georgia, Wrongful Death LawsuitMore GM Ignition Recall Lawsuit Stories Auto Safety Oversight Lacking At NHTSA, According to Audit February 29, 2016 Second GM Recall Lawsuit Headed to Trial March 14, After First Bellwether Dismissed Amid Fraud January 29, 2016 GM Bellwether Trial Begins Over Claims Airbag Did Not Deploy Due to Ignition Switch January 11, 2016 0 Comments URLThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (Posted: yesterday)Lawyers involved in Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuits have proposed an organizational structure for those chosen to represent the needs of all plaintiffs in the litigation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITSpinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)Abbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (07/23/2026)Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Meet With MDL Judge for Initial Conference Aug. 5 (07/16/2026) Depo-Provera Settlement Information to Be Presented Through Town Hall Meeting (Posted: 2 days ago)A federal judge has reviewed a Depo-Provera settlement agreement that could resolve thousands of brain tumor lawsuits, indicating that details of the confidential plan will be revealed to plaintiffs at a future hearing.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITNew Study Adds to Evidence Depo-Provera Injections Cause Meningioma Brain Tumor Risks (07/13/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (06/15/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026) J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits (Posted: 3 days ago)A $5.5 billion settlement deal could resolve nearly 80,000 talcum powder cancer lawsuits that claim Johnson & Johnson products were contaminated with asbestos.MORE ABOUT: TALCUM POWDER CANCER LAWSUITSAdditional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 (03/20/2026)Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J (02/16/2026)Evidence That Baby Powder Causes Ovarian Cancer Should Be Admissible At Trial: Report (01/22/2026)
Second GM Recall Lawsuit Headed to Trial March 14, After First Bellwether Dismissed Amid Fraud January 29, 2016
Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (Posted: yesterday)Lawyers involved in Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuits have proposed an organizational structure for those chosen to represent the needs of all plaintiffs in the litigation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITSpinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)Abbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (07/23/2026)Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Meet With MDL Judge for Initial Conference Aug. 5 (07/16/2026)
Depo-Provera Settlement Information to Be Presented Through Town Hall Meeting (Posted: 2 days ago)A federal judge has reviewed a Depo-Provera settlement agreement that could resolve thousands of brain tumor lawsuits, indicating that details of the confidential plan will be revealed to plaintiffs at a future hearing.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITNew Study Adds to Evidence Depo-Provera Injections Cause Meningioma Brain Tumor Risks (07/13/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (06/15/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026)
J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits (Posted: 3 days ago)A $5.5 billion settlement deal could resolve nearly 80,000 talcum powder cancer lawsuits that claim Johnson & Johnson products were contaminated with asbestos.MORE ABOUT: TALCUM POWDER CANCER LAWSUITSAdditional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 (03/20/2026)Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J (02/16/2026)Evidence That Baby Powder Causes Ovarian Cancer Should Be Admissible At Trial: Report (01/22/2026)