Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Medical Malpractice Payments Are Not Driving up Healthcare Costs: Study May 15, 2013 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments A new study by Johns Hopkins suggests that the effects of payments made in medical malpractice lawsuits on the cost of healthcare are hugely overblown, highlighting the misguided push to limit awards as part of tort reform efforts in recent years. ย According to a press release issued earlier this month by Johns Hopkins, researchers found that payouts in substantial medical malpractice claims add less than 1% to the cost of health care in the United States. The study was published in the Journal for Healthcare Quality, examining payments in “catastrophic” medical malpractice claims, involving payments of more than $1 million, which are likely to involve patient deaths, birth injuries, or other claims for problems that result in the need for lifelong medical care as a result of a medical mistake. Do You Know aboutโฆ SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know Aboutโฆ SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Researchers examined data from 2004 to 2010, finding that such substantial malpractice payments totalled only $1.4 billion. Most estimates place the cost of U.S. healthcare at around $2.8 trillion annually. In recent years, much of the political debate over the high cost of healthcare in the country has tried to lay some of the blame on medical malpractice lawsuit payouts, with politicians claiming that giving state legislatures the power to arbitrarily override jury decisions and cap awards at amounts unrelated to the details of the case would help control costs. However, this study adds to mounting research that has shown payouts for medical malpractice are much lower than is portrayed by tort reform advocates, and that it barely registers as a blip on the radar of healthcare costs. Defensive Medicine Costs Outstrip Malpractice Payouts According to the Johns Hopkins researchers, the cost of actual claims pales in comparison to the cost of defensive medicine; unnecessary medical procedures and tests doctors conduct on patients in order to avoid lawsuits. That cost totaled about $60 billion annually, or more than 40 times the cost of actual medical malpractice payouts. Between 2004 and 2010 there were 77,621 medical malpractice claims paid. Of that, 7.9%, or 6,130, were considered “catastrophic” payouts, meaning they were over $1 million. “The notion that frivolous claims are routinely resulting in $100 million payouts is not true,” said Dr. Marty Makary, an associate professor of surgery and health policy at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine and the lead researcher. “The real problem is that far too many tests and procedures are being performed in the name of defensive medicine, as physicians fear they could be sued if they don’t order them. It is not the payouts that are bankrupting the system — it’s the fear of them.” Other Studies Find Little Impact The study’s findings are similar to other recent studies that suggest the fear of medical malpractice far outweighs the actual threat to the health care system. A 2011 study published in the New England Medical Journal found that only 7.4% of physicians face the risk of medical malpractice claims each year. Only one out of every five claims result in a settlement or monetary award. Another study that year by Public Citizen, a consumer watchdog group, found that even defensive medicine’s costs do little to increase the cost of health care. The researchers found that the impact of defensive medicine is minimal and only accounts for 0.13% of overall healthcare costs. In many cases, doctors who claimed to be conducting defensive medicine are actually receiving financial incentives to order more tests. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Anesthesia, Johns Hopkins, Medical Malpractice, Medical Mistakes Image Credit: ||| More Lawsuit Stories Port Catheter Lawyers Outline Process for Selecting Bellwether Lawsuits in AngioDynamics MDL March 6, 2026 Trial Over Similac Necrotizing Enterocolitis Injuries Underway in Chicago March 6, 2026 Ethicon Harmonic Scalpel Lawsuit Alleges Fractured Device Left Metal Fragment in Pelvis March 6, 2026 1 Comments Joseph May 17, 2013 I doubt this study will help rescind damage caps and the hurdles medical negligence victims must jump through to pursue justice. Tort reformists are likely to ignore the Public Citizen study and argue doctors order too many tests and procedures in the name of defensive medicine to avoid lawsuits. However, does that make any sense? Doctors unethically ordering tests or performing procedures that are unnecessary, and penny-pinching insurance companies who only care about profits paying out large sums of money to support this conduct? If doctors truly are acting unethically by ordering unnecessary tests and performing unnecessary procedures, shouldn’t those doctors be held accountable? Isn’t it more realistic, and reasonable, to believe that as technology improves and patient expectations increase, doctors are using as many tools as are available? Granted, some insurance companies require doctors to order certain tests before other, more definitive tests, but the reality is patients want answers. Patients demand to know what is wrong with them and, if there is something to treat, patients want it treated. Long gone are the days of “wait and see”, or “it is probably benign”, or “I believe it is nothing to worry about”. As long as technology improves, patient education increases, and public dissemination of information continues, patients want definitive answers and curative treatment. URLThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Port Catheter Lawyers Outline Process for Selecting Bellwether Lawsuits in AngioDynamics MDL (Posted: today) In a joint statement, plaintiffs and defendants in AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits have laid guidelines for what types of cases should be selected to serve as potential bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Blood Clot Results in Lawsuit Against Device Manufacturer (02/04/2026)SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges AngioDynamics Catheter Defects Forced Surgical Removal (01/30/2026)Severe Sepsis Infection Leads to Vortex Port Catheter Wrongful Death Lawsuit (01/12/2026) Breast Mesh Implant Complications Often Leave Women Asking If They Have a Lawsuit (Posted: yesterday) Women who experienced infection, chronic inflammation, implant instability or other complications after internal bra mesh procedures are now questioning whether those risks were fully disclosed before implantation. MORE ABOUT: BREAST MESH LAWSUITCosmetic Surgeons Warn Against Using Internal Bra Mesh for Breast Lifts (12/11/2025)GalaFLEX Breast Mesh Problems Were Highlighted in Warnings Issued by Former Becton Dickinson Medical Director (11/14/2025)Breast Mesh Reconstruction Surgery Gaining Popularity Despite Safety Concerns, Lawsuits (11/10/2025) Nearly 4,000 Women Are Pursuing a Depo-Provera Lawsuit After Developing Brain Tumors (Posted: 2 days ago) More than 3,300 women have filed Depo-Provera lawsuits in federal court, with several hundred more also pending in state courts in New York and Delaware, according to a recent status report. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITLong-Term Side Effects of Depo-Provera Caused Meningioma and Hearing Loss, Lawsuit Says (02/26/2026)Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Risks Make Birth Control Shot Unreasonably Dangerous: Lawsuit (02/20/2026)Pfizer Indicates Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawsuits Should Be Preempted by Federal Law (02/03/2026)
Port Catheter Lawyers Outline Process for Selecting Bellwether Lawsuits in AngioDynamics MDL March 6, 2026
Ethicon Harmonic Scalpel Lawsuit Alleges Fractured Device Left Metal Fragment in Pelvis March 6, 2026
Port Catheter Lawyers Outline Process for Selecting Bellwether Lawsuits in AngioDynamics MDL (Posted: today) In a joint statement, plaintiffs and defendants in AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits have laid guidelines for what types of cases should be selected to serve as potential bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Blood Clot Results in Lawsuit Against Device Manufacturer (02/04/2026)SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges AngioDynamics Catheter Defects Forced Surgical Removal (01/30/2026)Severe Sepsis Infection Leads to Vortex Port Catheter Wrongful Death Lawsuit (01/12/2026)
Breast Mesh Implant Complications Often Leave Women Asking If They Have a Lawsuit (Posted: yesterday) Women who experienced infection, chronic inflammation, implant instability or other complications after internal bra mesh procedures are now questioning whether those risks were fully disclosed before implantation. MORE ABOUT: BREAST MESH LAWSUITCosmetic Surgeons Warn Against Using Internal Bra Mesh for Breast Lifts (12/11/2025)GalaFLEX Breast Mesh Problems Were Highlighted in Warnings Issued by Former Becton Dickinson Medical Director (11/14/2025)Breast Mesh Reconstruction Surgery Gaining Popularity Despite Safety Concerns, Lawsuits (11/10/2025)
Nearly 4,000 Women Are Pursuing a Depo-Provera Lawsuit After Developing Brain Tumors (Posted: 2 days ago) More than 3,300 women have filed Depo-Provera lawsuits in federal court, with several hundred more also pending in state courts in New York and Delaware, according to a recent status report. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITLong-Term Side Effects of Depo-Provera Caused Meningioma and Hearing Loss, Lawsuit Says (02/26/2026)Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Risks Make Birth Control Shot Unreasonably Dangerous: Lawsuit (02/20/2026)Pfizer Indicates Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawsuits Should Be Preempted by Federal Law (02/03/2026)