Paxil Lawsuit Over Birth Defects Results in $2.5M Award in Pennsylvania

|
AboutLawsuits

Add Your Comments

In the first jury verdict out of more 600 Paxil lawsuits pending against GlaxoSmithKline PLC, a Pennsylvania jury has found that use of the antidepressant during pregnancy resulted in birth defects for a three year old child and awarded $2.5 million in compensation.

The decision was handed down Tuesday in the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas, in a lawsuit was brought by the family of Lyam Kilker, whose mother, Michelle David, alleged that GlaxoSmithKline failed to adequately warn about the risk of Paxil birth defects.

Paxil (paroxetine) is a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor prescribed to treat depression. Approved in 1992, it has become one of the most commonly prescribed drugs in the United States, with sales of just under $1 billion in 2008.

Do You Know about…

Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits

Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.

Learn More
SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

Do You Know About…

Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuits

Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.

Learn More
SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION

The use of Paxil during pregnancy has been linked to an increased risk of persistent pulmonary hypertension in newborns (PPHN) and other heart problems. In lawsuits pending throughout the United States, plaintiffs allege that GlaxoSmithKline hid test data and misled doctors and consumers about the risk.

In December 2005, the FDA issued an alert about the risk of birth defects from Paxil after studies showed the drug could increase the risk of the heart defects when taken during the first three months of pregnancy. At that time, the agency also required GlaxoSmithKline to update the warning label to include information about the risk of birth defects from Paxil side effects.

At trial, the plaintiffs argued that GlaxoSmithKline’s handling of the drug was outrageous, presenting internal e-mails and memos that showed scientists and executives for the drug company were aware of the Paxil birth defect side effects, even as they minimized the risk to doctors. Evidence was also introduced that suggested Glaxo aggressively promoted Paxil for use in pregnant women even after suspecting the risk.

After deliberating for seven hours, the jury awarded $2.5 million in compensatory damages, but did not award any punitive damages.

Glaxo officials maintain that they do not believe a link has been established between Paxil and Kilker’s birth defects, and said they will appeal the verdict.

Tags: Antidepressant, Birth Defect, GlaxoSmithKline, Paxil, Paxil Birth Defect, Pennsylvania, Persistent Pulmonary Hypertension, Philadelphia, PPHN
Image Credit: |

More Lawsuit Stories

2 Comments

Angie
I was taking paxil when I became pregnant in 2003. I talked to the Dr. and slowly came off of it. My son has recently been diagnosed with epilepsy. Could this be related to the paxil during my first trimester?
Bev
GlaxoSmithKline appears to have a terrible track records for NOT informing the dangers of many of their medications and medical devices. Being a big corporations isn’t necessarily better. I hope that anyone with a legitimate suit against GSK wins big!

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

JPML Sets Hearing Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Consolidation For May 28
In late May, a panel of federal judges will hold oral arguments over whether all federal spinal cord stimulator lawsuits should be consolidated before one judge for pretrial proceedings.
Fire Pit Burn Lawsuits Mount as CPSC Issues Warning Over New Flame Jetting Injuries, Death
As the number of lawsuits over tabletop fire pits continues to grow, the CPSC has issued a warning indicating that despite a consumer’s death linked to one product, the manufacturer has not agreed to remove the devices from the market.
Depo-Provera Meningioma Warning Update Should Be Added to Birth Control Shot Lawsuit
A Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuit argues that Pfizer had a duty to warn women about scientific evidence linking the birth control shot to potential brain tumor growth yet failed to do so.