Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Drug Maker Overhyped, Oversold Anemia Meds: Report July 24, 2012 Ricky Allen Add Your CommentsThree popular anemia drugs, Epogen, Procrit and Aranesp, may be far less effective, and far more dangerous, than their manufacturer led the public and experts to believe, according to an investigative report.The Washington Post reports that the drug maker Amgen may have intentionally overhyped the three drugs, while downplaying or ignoring concerns about potential side effects that may increase the risk of cancer, strokes and other injuries.The alleged deception was aided by pouring money into congress through the use of lobbyists, who pressured the FDA and lawmakers to look the other way, the report claims.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONAranesp (darbepoetin alfa), Epogen (Epoetin alfa) and Procrit (Epoetin alfa) are prescribed to patients with kidney disease, anemia, HIV and cancer to stimulate bones and increase the production of red blood cells. They are also prescribed to patients preparing to undergo major non-heart surgery, to reduce the number of transfusions such patients must receive. Amgen manufactures all three drugs, though Procrit is sold and marketed by Johnson and Johnson.In 2008, Aranesp sales were $3.1 billion, and Procrit accounted for $2.46 billion in sales. Researchers estimate that by 2002, the drugs were being prescribed to nearly half of all cancer patients. By 2007, 80% of dialysis patients were being given the drugs at levels the FDA has now deemed to be unsafe.Doctors, Amgen Raked in the MoneySince the three drugs were administered by physicians, Amgen allegedly encouraged doctors to be more inclined to use the drugs by overfilling vials by as much as 25 percent, and offered discounts to doctors who used the drugs in large volume. This allowed doctors to take advantage of what is known as the “spread,” the difference between the price they paid for the drugs and the price they charged patients.Lobbyists were also employed to help, getting Congress and Medicare officials to sign off on a pricing structure that allowed doctors and hospitals to be reimbursed for more than they actually paid for the drugs.The Medicare Payment Advisory Commission estimates that the overpayments reached as high as 30%. Some doctors made as much as $300,000 a year off of the drugs alone, while Amgen made huge profits.All the while, Amgen allegedly dragged its feet for 10 years on commitments to complete research that actually showed what effect the drugs did to patients being given them.In the meantime, other studies began to come out that painted a disturbing picture for users about the three drugs. After studies showed that the side effects of Aranesp, Epogen and Procrit included increased cancer and stroke risk and may have been costing lives, the FDA issued a public health advisory in 2007, warning that they could increase the risk of death at higher doses. The warning to the public was accompanied by the requirement that all three drugs carry a “black box” warning, which is the most stringent warning the FDA can require a drug to carry.Amgen claims the company was concerned primarily about patient safety, and were as surprised as anyone at studies that showed high doses could be lethal. However, the company had been facing FDA requirements for clinical trials since shortly after the drugs had first gone on the market in 1989.More Approvals, Larger DosesWhile Amgen was supposed to be meeting FDA-required standards of proof over the drugs’ effectiveness, they were instead working to convince the FDA to expand approvals so that the drugs could be used in more patients. Originally limited to the small number of dialysis patients that required blood transfusions, the three drugs were later approved for patients with more mild forms of anemia.Although the drug maker studies were still not finished, the FDA approved the medications to treat cancer patients, then AIDS patients, then even patients undergoing hip and knee surgery. And the average dosage had tripled. The FDA had to rein Amgen in from claims that the drugs even made people happier and gave them better sex lives.The full results of the “required” clinical trials were never released, although they were supposedly completed in 2004. The FDA claims that those results were misfiled and disappeared. Other studies were attempted and either abandoned or left incomplete. Now Amgen says that a clinical trial will be finished by 2017.The drugs are now restricted under an FDA-required risk evaluation and mitigation strategy (REMS). Doctors and hospitals that wish to prescribe the drugs have to undergo special training to identify high risk users and negative side effects.Business Goes OnRecently, Amgenโs board of directors declared a dividend of 36 cents per share for the third quarter of 2012. According to media reports, the Thousand Oaks-based biotech giant will pay the dividend Sept. 7 to all stockholders of record as of the close of business Aug. 16.This is the third dividend Amgen has paid since announcing its first in April 2011. In December, Amgen’s board declared a dividend of 36 cents per share for the first quarter of 2012. The dividends were paid in March. In April, Amgen said revenue increased by 9 percent to $4 billion in the first quarter of 2012. Tags: Amgen, Anemia, Anemia Drug, Aranesp, Epogen, Procrit Image Credit: |||More Lawsuit Stories Hearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 April 15, 2026 GLP-1 Wrongful Death Lawsuit Claims Compounder Sold Contaminated Meds April 15, 2026 Lawsuit Alleges Femoral Nail Failure Caused Permanent Physical Impairment April 15, 2026 0 Comments CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Hearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (Posted: today)A federal judge has scheduled general causation hearings for Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuits for June 24 through 26.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITHigh-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (04/06/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (03/25/2026)Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Reported Among Birth Control Users (03/19/2026) WaveWriter Alpha Lawsuit Claims Defective Spinal Cord Stimulator Caused Pain and Surgical Removal (Posted: yesterday)A Louisiana man’s Boston Scientific WaveWriter Alpha SCS lawsuit claims the implant failed to provide the promised pain relief and, in fact, made things worse before it needed to be surgically removed.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (04/08/2026)Medtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (04/03/2026)Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Filed Over Device Malfunction, Failure (03/30/2026) BetMGM Lawsuit Alleges Gambling Addictโs โSelf-Exclusionโ Listing Was Not Honored (Posted: 2 days ago)A Tennessee manโs lawsuit alleges that BetMGM ignored his placement on self-exclusion lists maintained by both the State of Tennessee and the companyโs own platform.MORE ABOUT: SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITDraftKings Settlement Reached in Lawsuit Over MLB Gambling Promotions (04/10/2026)DraftKings, FanDuel Claim Sports Betting Apps Not Affected by State Policy (04/08/2026)DraftKings, FanDuel Face Lawsuits Over Gambling Losses Caused by Addictive Designs (03/31/2026)
Hearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 April 15, 2026
Hearings on Evidence That Depo-Provera Causes Meningioma Brain Tumors Set for Late June 2026 (Posted: today)A federal judge has scheduled general causation hearings for Depo-Provera brain tumor lawsuits for June 24 through 26.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITHigh-Risk Brain Tumor From Depo-Provera Requires Frequent Monitoring, Lawsuit Claims (04/06/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Lawyers Reappointed to MDL Leadership Roles (03/25/2026)Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Symptoms Reported Among Birth Control Users (03/19/2026)
WaveWriter Alpha Lawsuit Claims Defective Spinal Cord Stimulator Caused Pain and Surgical Removal (Posted: yesterday)A Louisiana man’s Boston Scientific WaveWriter Alpha SCS lawsuit claims the implant failed to provide the promised pain relief and, in fact, made things worse before it needed to be surgically removed.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Neuromodulation Lawsuit Claims Spinal Cord Stimulator Exacerbated Chronic Pain (04/08/2026)Medtronic SCS Lawsuit Alleges Intellis LT Neurostimulator Caused Worsening Pain (04/03/2026)Nevro Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits Filed Over Device Malfunction, Failure (03/30/2026)
BetMGM Lawsuit Alleges Gambling Addictโs โSelf-Exclusionโ Listing Was Not Honored (Posted: 2 days ago)A Tennessee manโs lawsuit alleges that BetMGM ignored his placement on self-exclusion lists maintained by both the State of Tennessee and the companyโs own platform.MORE ABOUT: SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITDraftKings Settlement Reached in Lawsuit Over MLB Gambling Promotions (04/10/2026)DraftKings, FanDuel Claim Sports Betting Apps Not Affected by State Policy (04/08/2026)DraftKings, FanDuel Face Lawsuits Over Gambling Losses Caused by Addictive Designs (03/31/2026)