Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
External Defibrillator Problems May Lead to Stricter FDA Requirements January 24, 2011 Staff Writers Add Your CommentsFederal regulators are proposing more stringent standards for the manufacture of external heart defibrillators, including a stricter approval process, to combat thousands of reports involving defibrillator malfunctions.ย This week, an FDA advisory committee will weigh the possible effectiveness and feasibility of a new external defibrillator improvement initiative, which proposes to require that automated external defibrillators (AEDs) be required to go through a strict premarket approval process. This would exclude the devices from participating in the FDAโs 510(k) approval process, which is a fast-track program that only requires that they be substantially equivalent to other medical devices already on the market.The agency is also working with the University of Coloradoโs Department of Emergency Medicine to develop a defibrillator registry and will work with the medical device manufacturers to develop new manufacturing standards.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONConcerns over the safety of external defibrillators, especially AEDs, has been growing as the FDA has increasingly received reports of malfunctions and announced defibrillator recalls. From January 1, 2005 to July 10, 2010 the FDA received more than 28,000 medical device reports on problems with defibrillators, including malfunctions that led to patient deaths.According to the FDA, there were 68 external defibrillator recalls during the same time period, with the number of recalls growing each year. In 2005, there were nine recalls, but in 2009 there were 17. During the same time period, the FDA received more than 28,000 MDRs of defibrillator problems. That number, too, increased over the years from 4,210 reports in 2005 to 7,807 reports last year.In November, the FDA sent a letter to medical device manufacturers warning them that if they could face stricter regulation of external defibrillators if they did not take action to address the recurring problems.Last yearย saw a number of major defibrillator recalls and other defibrillator developments. In February, Cardiac Sciences recalled about 12,200 automated external defibrillators (AEDs) because the units could fail when needed. That recall was later expanded to 280,000 units when the FDA warned that the defective components were widespread throughout the companyโs products.Defibtech also recalled 5,400 rechargeable defibrillator battery packs in June due to defects that could prevent them from providing power.Medtronicโs Physio-Control Inc. subsidiary has had to make two major recalls of LIFEPAK defibrillators. In April a recall of the LIFEPAK 15 defibrillators was announced because the units could turn off and on by themselves. In July about 43,000 LIFEPAK 20 and LIFEPAK 20e units were recalled due to possible power failures.The meeting of the Medical Devices Advisory Committeeโs Circulatory System Devices Panel is scheduled for January 25 and 26 from 8 a.m. to 6 p.m. at the Holiday Inn in Gaithersburg, Maryland. Tags: Defibrillator, External Defibrillator, LIFEPAK, Medical Device, Medtronic, Physio-ControlMore Lawsuit Stories Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL July 31, 2026 Ocoopa Hand Warmer Recall Issued After 350 Burn Injuries, One Death July 31, 2026 Depo-Provera Settlement Information to Be Presented Through Town Hall Meeting July 30, 2026 0 Comments NameThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (Posted: today)Lawyers involved in Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuits have proposed an organizational structure for those chosen to represent the needs of all plaintiffs in the litigation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITSpinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)Abbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (07/23/2026)Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Meet With MDL Judge for Initial Conference Aug. 5 (07/16/2026) Depo-Provera Settlement Information to Be Presented Through Town Hall Meeting (Posted: yesterday)A federal judge has reviewed a Depo-Provera settlement agreement that could resolve thousands of brain tumor lawsuits, indicating that details of the confidential plan will be revealed to plaintiffs at a future hearing.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITNew Study Adds to Evidence Depo-Provera Injections Cause Meningioma Brain Tumor Risks (07/13/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (06/15/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026) J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits (Posted: 2 days ago)A $5.5 billion settlement deal could resolve nearly 80,000 talcum powder cancer lawsuits that claim Johnson & Johnson products were contaminated with asbestos.MORE ABOUT: TALCUM POWDER CANCER LAWSUITSAdditional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 (03/20/2026)Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J (02/16/2026)Evidence That Baby Powder Causes Ovarian Cancer Should Be Admissible At Trial: Report (01/22/2026)
Spine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (Posted: today)Lawyers involved in Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuits have proposed an organizational structure for those chosen to represent the needs of all plaintiffs in the litigation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITSpinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)Abbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (07/23/2026)Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Meet With MDL Judge for Initial Conference Aug. 5 (07/16/2026)
Depo-Provera Settlement Information to Be Presented Through Town Hall Meeting (Posted: yesterday)A federal judge has reviewed a Depo-Provera settlement agreement that could resolve thousands of brain tumor lawsuits, indicating that details of the confidential plan will be revealed to plaintiffs at a future hearing.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITNew Study Adds to Evidence Depo-Provera Injections Cause Meningioma Brain Tumor Risks (07/13/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (06/15/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026)
J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits (Posted: 2 days ago)A $5.5 billion settlement deal could resolve nearly 80,000 talcum powder cancer lawsuits that claim Johnson & Johnson products were contaminated with asbestos.MORE ABOUT: TALCUM POWDER CANCER LAWSUITSAdditional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 (03/20/2026)Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J (02/16/2026)Evidence That Baby Powder Causes Ovarian Cancer Should Be Admissible At Trial: Report (01/22/2026)