Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Range Rover, Land Rover Recall Issued Due to Brake Problems February 10, 2015 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsAlmost 75,000 Jaguar Range Rover and Land Rover vehicles have been recalled following reports of rupturing brake hoses, which could pose a crash risk to drivers due to longer distances required for stopping.ย The Jaguar Land Rover/Range Rover recall was announced by the U.S. National Highway Traffic Safety Commission on February 6, after receiving a crash report that was allegedly caused by a rupturing brake hose.The vehicles pose a safety hazard because they may require greater than normal distances to stop when the brakes are applied due to insufficient amounts of braking fluid running through the hose, and in some incidents deplete braking ability completely.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe recall includes certain 2006 through 2012 Jaguar Land Rover and Range Rover vehicles that were manufactured from April 15, 2005 to September 4, 2012. The NHTSA announced there are 74,648 potentially affected vehicles in the U.S. that contain one or two flexible front brake hoses that could rupture unexpectedly. At least one accident has been attributed to the problem.Incidents of rupturing brake hoses in the vehicles have been recorded since 2010, when the automaker opened an investigation after receiving reports of brake fluid leaks and consumers claiming more force was required to apply the brakes.In November 2010, Jaguar reported to the NHTSA that it had recognized a small number of brake fluid leaks from the brake flex hose and initiated a Critical Concerns Review to further test the components.According to Jaguar, the brake hoses that experienced the bulge condition were pressure tested and exceeded the pressure specified requirements. The automaker did not determine any safety hazard or loss of integrity to the brake hoses and closed the investigation without any recall issuance.Following an accident report involving a rupturing brake hose causing a driver to lose braking ability in November 2014, the NHTSA challenged Jaguarโs conclusion and opened another investigation. After further reviewing the brake hoses the NHTSA and Jaguar determined there was an unreasonable risk to safety and initiated a recall.Land Rover plans to notify owners by mail with instructions on how to schedule a free replacement of the left and right front brake hoses at certified dealer. The recall is anticipated to begin on March 13, 2015. Customers with further question may contact Land Rover customer Service at 1-800-637-6837.Separately, Jaguar also recalled nearly 25,000 vehicles on January 29, 2015, after recognizing certain 2014 model year Range Rover Sport vehicles and certain 2013 and 2014 Range Rover vehicles may have had the Brake Vacuum Hose incorrectly routed during the manufacturing process.According to Jaguarโs Land Rover recall noticeย (PDF), the installation instructions for the brake hoses did not specify its routing, potentially causing the vacuum hoses to chafe and rupture which could eventually result in decreased braking ability and crash risks.Jaguar plans to notify owners of the issue and will inspect the condition of the vacuum hose and if no damage is evident, correctly route the hose. If damage is visible the technicians will replace the hoses. Both services will be free of charge.Jaguar also issued a Jaguar XK recall affecting more than 4,700 vehicles from the 2012 through 2015 model years, due to extinguishing front side lights.According to the auto maker, when the side lights are switched on with the ignition off, the front lights should remain illuminated until the battery is exhausted rather than extinguishing after 5 minutes. Jaguar plans to notify owners and begin repairing the issue free of charge on March 13, 2015. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Auto Accident, Auto Recall, Jaguar Image Credit: Image via <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/gallery-1778405p1.html?cr=00&pl=edit-00">TK Kurikawa</a> / <a href="http://www.shutterstock.com/editorial?cr=00&pl=edit-00">Shutterstock.com</a>More Lawsuit Stories Depo-Provera Settlement Information to Be Presented Through Town Hall Meeting July 30, 2026 Court Rejects Appeal in Similac Special Care Lawsuit Over NEC Warnings July 30, 2026 iPhone Fire Lawsuit Alleges Apple Smartphone Exploded, Causing Severe Burn Injuries July 30, 2026 0 Comments FacebookThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Settlement Information to Be Presented Through Town Hall Meeting (Posted: today)A federal judge has reviewed a Depo-Provera settlement agreement that could resolve thousands of brain tumor lawsuits, indicating that details of the confidential plan will be revealed to plaintiffs at a future hearing.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITNew Study Adds to Evidence Depo-Provera Injections Cause Meningioma Brain Tumor Risks (07/13/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (06/15/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026) J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits (Posted: yesterday)A $5.5 billion settlement deal could resolve nearly 80,000 talcum powder cancer lawsuits that claim Johnson & Johnson products were contaminated with asbestos.MORE ABOUT: TALCUM POWDER CANCER LAWSUITSAdditional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 (03/20/2026)Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J (02/16/2026)Evidence That Baby Powder Causes Ovarian Cancer Should Be Admissible At Trial: Report (01/22/2026) Chlorpyrifos Exposure Lawsuit Claims Pesticide Caused Farmer’s Parkinson’s Disease Diagnosis (Posted: 2 days ago)A chlorpyrifos lawsuit claims years of exposure through residence and work left a California man with a Parkinson’s disease diagnosis.MORE ABOUT: CHLORPYRIFOS PARKINSONโS DISEASE LAWSUITChlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Claims Years of Insecticide Exposure Caused Neurological Side Effects (07/22/2026)Chlorpyrifos (CPF) Exposure Linked to Abnormal Brain Development in Children: Study (08/27/2025)Court Ruling Allows EPA to Proceed with Chlorpyrifos Ban (10/23/2023)
Depo-Provera Settlement Information to Be Presented Through Town Hall Meeting (Posted: today)A federal judge has reviewed a Depo-Provera settlement agreement that could resolve thousands of brain tumor lawsuits, indicating that details of the confidential plan will be revealed to plaintiffs at a future hearing.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITNew Study Adds to Evidence Depo-Provera Injections Cause Meningioma Brain Tumor Risks (07/13/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (06/15/2026)Depo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026)
J&J Agrees to $5.5B Talcum Powder Settlement Payout to Resolve Ovarian Cancer Lawsuits (Posted: yesterday)A $5.5 billion settlement deal could resolve nearly 80,000 talcum powder cancer lawsuits that claim Johnson & Johnson products were contaminated with asbestos.MORE ABOUT: TALCUM POWDER CANCER LAWSUITSAdditional Talks To Settle Talcum Powder Cancer Lawsuits Set for April 13 (03/20/2026)Ovarian Cancer Talcum Powder Lawsuit Results in $250K Verdict Against J&J (02/16/2026)Evidence That Baby Powder Causes Ovarian Cancer Should Be Admissible At Trial: Report (01/22/2026)
Chlorpyrifos Exposure Lawsuit Claims Pesticide Caused Farmer’s Parkinson’s Disease Diagnosis (Posted: 2 days ago)A chlorpyrifos lawsuit claims years of exposure through residence and work left a California man with a Parkinson’s disease diagnosis.MORE ABOUT: CHLORPYRIFOS PARKINSONโS DISEASE LAWSUITChlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Claims Years of Insecticide Exposure Caused Neurological Side Effects (07/22/2026)Chlorpyrifos (CPF) Exposure Linked to Abnormal Brain Development in Children: Study (08/27/2025)Court Ruling Allows EPA to Proceed with Chlorpyrifos Ban (10/23/2023)