Lehman Brothers Lawsuit to be Filed by California County
October 30th, 2008 • Filed Under: News • 4 Comments
San Mateo County, California, has indicated they intend to file a lawsuit against Lehman Brothers’ top officers for making false and misleading statements about the investment bank’s financial position during the weeks leading up to a bankruptcy filing on September 15, 2008.
As a result of the Lehman Brothers collapse, the county lost approximately $150 million from their $2.6 billion investment pool, which has impacted schools, cities and other special districts that contributed to the fund.
The San Mateo County’s Board of Supervisors voted this week in favor of retaining a financial fraud law firm on a contingency fee basis to file the Lehman Brothers lawsuit, which means that there will not be any attorney fees unless they are successful obtaining a recovery from the former executives.
The Lehman Brothers bankruptcy, which was the largest filing in U.S. history, was caused by the sub-prime mortgage crisis that the investment back helped create.
While the county has already filed a claim along with other creditors in New York bankruptcy court, seeking its share of the investment bank’s estate, a separate lawsuit should be filed next week against former Lehman Brothers officers Richard Fuld, CEO, Joseph Gregory, COO, Thomas Russo, executive Vice President and chief legal officer, and Erin Callan, former CFO and global controller.
The Lehman Brothers lawsuit will allege that the executives are equally responsible for San Mateo County’s losses for making misleading statements that they relied on prior to the bankruptcy. Indications were made that the bank was adequately capitalized, which is now known to be false.
Last month, a Lehman Brothers class action lawsuit was filed against the former executives and other firms who underwrote a offering of Lehman Preferred Series “J” stock shares in February 2008. The lawsuit alleges that false and misleading statements were made about the financial strength of the investment bank at the time the offering was made, months before the bankruptcy.
A number of individual investors who purchased stock of Lehman structured notes during the months before the bankruptcy based on recommendations of their broker, are also pursuing claims to recover their losses. Lehman Brothers fraud lawyers have indicated that investors may be able to recoup losses caused by overconcentration on investment bank funds, unsuitable investment recommendations and misrepresentations about the financial position of Lehman Brothers.

Comment by Mikki on 1 November 2008:
I’m not a crybaby, I will take my losses on stocks, knew the job was dangerous. On my A rated corporate bonds with Wamu and Lehmans, I’m mad as hell. I lent them the money and they defaulted. Any one of us would be in court if we defaulted. I’m lookilng forward to suing the basturds.
Pingback by Lehman Brothers Structured Note Investors Pursuing Arbitration to Recover Losses : AboutLawsuits.com on 3 November 2008:
[...] large institutional investors have filed Lehman Brothers lawsuits directly against former executives of the investment bank, seeking to hold them responsible for [...]
Comment by Janice on 20 November 2008:
I too would like to be a party in any class action suit against LB regarding the $34K Corporate Bonds that I lost due to misrepresentation by the Company. I purchased my notes 04/08/2003 and rating was A+/A1 by Edward Jones Investments. My investment was “Solicited” by Edward Jones as a very good investment with a yiled of 5.50%.
Comment by ROBERT on 1 January 2009:
i would like to join the lawsuit, i got stuck the same way as janice and many others. it was all i had and i believed everything they told me. they claim to be looking out for you, but thats BS