Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Stronger Indoor Tanning Regulations Needed, Doctors Say May 29, 2015 Martha Garcia Add Your CommentsThe FDA should place more stringent federal regulations on indoor tanning beds and restrict the use of the devices by the nation’s youth, according to recommendations in a new editorial.ย In the latest issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), an editorial written by Darren May PhD, and John Kraemer, both from Georgetown University, highlights the risks posed by indoor tanning.According to the editorial, regulations currently in place are insufficient โputting the agency in the unusual situation of balancing the safety and health benefits of technology with very limited therapeutic benefit with commercial interests.โDo You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe FDA reclassified indoor tanning equipment as class II medical devices in May 2014. The agency also added a black box warning to the devices, indicating they should not be used by minors. It also warns of health risks associated with tanning, including the risk of cancer.Despite the warning, there is no federal regulation that prevents teens from using indoor tanning devices. As such, the editorial calls for a broader public health approach to the use and regulation of the devices among teens.Skin cancer is the most common malignancy in the U.S. with nearly 4 million cases diagnosed every year, and the incidence is increasing.Researchers say the majority of skin cancer cases are preventable, including 90% of melanomas, which are the most lethal type of skin cancer. The simple way to prevent the majority of cases is by reducing UV radiation exposure, especially during adolescence and young adulthood when much of the cancer-causing damage occurs. experts say. It is believed by many that limiting the use of UV devices by youth would greatly reduce the number of skin cancer cases.โThe skin cancer risks associated with indoor tanning primarily manifest later in life, and the perceived benefits of tanned skin are thought by young people to outweigh future risks,โ wrote May.The editorial also noted that more than 10% of annual cases of skin cancer in the U.S. are related to indoor tanning, equating to more than 350,000 cases.Indoor tanning devices are classified as carcinogenic to humans by the International Agency of Research on Cancer (IARC). The agency, a division of the World Health Organization (WHO), has determined that indoor tanning devices, classified as sunlamps by the FDA, increase the risk of melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancer in humans.Melanoma is the most deadly form of skin cancer, and most common type of skin cancer among young women ages 15 to 39. Researchers say this is in part due to the high prevalence of indoor tanning among this age group.Indoor Tanning Not Regulated Like Other CarcinogensโFrom a public health perspective the indoor tanning device regulations are not commensurate to those of other regulated products that are known carcinogens with very little or no therapeutic benefit,โ said May.Researchers are calling for the FDA to impose a national minimum age requirement on indoor tanning devices. They said the devices should be regulated, much like tobacco products are, because they are both public health risks which may lead to death.Nearly $8 billion is spent annually for treatment, loss of productivity and other health associated costs related to skin cancer.In states that have introduced indoor tanning restrictions, either age restrictions or parental permission, cancer risk among youth has effectively been reduced. Female adolescents are 30% less likely to indoor tan in states with such restriction.More than 40 states and several county and local governments have implemented policies concerning age restrictions or parental permission for indoor tanning devices. However, the authors say this may result in conflicting standards which may be confusing across different states, which is why a federal regulation is needed. Written by: Martha GarciaHealth & Medical Research WriterMartha Garcia is a health and medical research writer at AboutLawsuits.com with over 15 years of experience covering peer-reviewed studies and emerging public health risks. She previously led content strategy at The Blogsmith and contributes original reporting on drug safety, medical research, and health trends impacting consumers. Tags: Melanoma, Skin Cancer, Tanning BedMore Lawsuit Stories FDA Requires New Vision Loss Warnings for Ozempic, Wegovy and Other GLP-1s Over NAION Risk November 9, 2026 Consolidated Lawsuit Over Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Filed in MDL November 9, 2026 Teen Social Media Use Linked to Depression, Anxiety and Cyberbullying: Study November 9, 2026 0 Comments PhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES FDA Requires New Vision Loss Warnings for Ozempic, Wegovy and Other GLP-1s Over NAION Risk (Posted: today)Federal regulators are requiring all GLP-1 medications to carry new label warnings indicating the side effects could put patients at risk of sudden and permanent vision loss.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic Blindness Lawsuit Alleges Novo Nordisk Concealed NAION Risks (10/30/2026)GLP-1 Vision Loss Lawsuit Alleges Ozempic Caused Man to Become Legally Blind (10/13/2026)Ozempic Injection Lawsuit Claims Diabetes Medication Caused Vision Loss (09/22/2026) Consolidated Lawsuit Over Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Filed in MDL (Posted: today)Individuals involved in Boston Scientific SCS implant lawsuits have submitted a Master Complaint that would help streamline future filing.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITAbbott Sales Reps Kept Trying to Reprogram Failed SCS Implant: Lawsuit (11/02/2026)Abbott Proclaim Elite Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Malfunction Worsened Chronic Pain (10/29/2026)Boston Scientific Spectra WaveWriter Lawsuit Alleges Lead Fracture, Migration and Painful Electric Shocks (10/21/2026) Apple AirTags Allowed Abusive Husband to Stalk, Control Wife, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: 3 days ago)A woman’s lawsuit claims her husband used an Apple AirTag bluetooth tracking device to stalk and abuse her.MORE ABOUT: APPLE AIRTAG LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Defective Apple AirTag Safety Features Allowed Domestic Violence Stalking (10/26/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Apple AirTag Tracker Used to Monitor Womanโs Location (10/14/2026)Apple AirTag Stalking Lawsuits Consolidated in Northern District of California (10/08/2026)
FDA Requires New Vision Loss Warnings for Ozempic, Wegovy and Other GLP-1s Over NAION Risk November 9, 2026
Consolidated Lawsuit Over Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Filed in MDL November 9, 2026
FDA Requires New Vision Loss Warnings for Ozempic, Wegovy and Other GLP-1s Over NAION Risk (Posted: today)Federal regulators are requiring all GLP-1 medications to carry new label warnings indicating the side effects could put patients at risk of sudden and permanent vision loss.MORE ABOUT: OZEMPIC LAWSUITOzempic Blindness Lawsuit Alleges Novo Nordisk Concealed NAION Risks (10/30/2026)GLP-1 Vision Loss Lawsuit Alleges Ozempic Caused Man to Become Legally Blind (10/13/2026)Ozempic Injection Lawsuit Claims Diabetes Medication Caused Vision Loss (09/22/2026)
Consolidated Lawsuit Over Boston Scientific Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Filed in MDL (Posted: today)Individuals involved in Boston Scientific SCS implant lawsuits have submitted a Master Complaint that would help streamline future filing.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITAbbott Sales Reps Kept Trying to Reprogram Failed SCS Implant: Lawsuit (11/02/2026)Abbott Proclaim Elite Lawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Malfunction Worsened Chronic Pain (10/29/2026)Boston Scientific Spectra WaveWriter Lawsuit Alleges Lead Fracture, Migration and Painful Electric Shocks (10/21/2026)
Apple AirTags Allowed Abusive Husband to Stalk, Control Wife, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: 3 days ago)A woman’s lawsuit claims her husband used an Apple AirTag bluetooth tracking device to stalk and abuse her.MORE ABOUT: APPLE AIRTAG LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Defective Apple AirTag Safety Features Allowed Domestic Violence Stalking (10/26/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Apple AirTag Tracker Used to Monitor Womanโs Location (10/14/2026)Apple AirTag Stalking Lawsuits Consolidated in Northern District of California (10/08/2026)