Zimmer Durom Cup Sales Suspended

On Tuesday, Zimmer Holdings, Inc. suspended sales of its Durom Cup artificial hip component in the U.S. This action was taken after the device manufacturer reviewed a number of reports from surgeons who experienced a higher than expected rate of Zimmer Durom Cups loosening and requiring total hip replacement revisions.

Zimmer announced that they will develop new product labeling which provides more comprehensive instructions about special surgical techniques that doctors should use to reduce the risk of problems after they perform a total hip replacement. The company will also implement a surgical training program in the U.S. and will only allow doctors to implant the Durom Cup after they have completed the training.

The Zimmer Durom Cup was introduced in Europe in 2003 and was first approved in the United States in 2006. The Durom Acetabular Component is a monoblock of cobal chromium alloy. It is designed for use in combination with Zimmer’s Metasul Metal-on-Metal Tribological Solution Large Diameter Heads (LDH). The company states that the newer type of artificial hip addresses some of the more common issues with traditional hip replacement components, such as wear of the bearing, range of motion and instability.

Did You Know?

Ticketmaster Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Ticketmaster data breach exposed the names, addresses, phone numbers, credit card numbers and other personal information of more than 560 million customers, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

The Zimmer Durom Acetabular Component has been implanted in over 12,000 people in the United States since 2006. While very few problems have been reported in Europe, a number of U.S. surgeons have complained that patients developed post-hip surgery problems or loosening of the parts, often requiring additional surgical revisions.

In May 2008, Zimmer sent a letter to healthcare providers indicating that they were initiating an investigation into the complaints surrounding their Durom artificial hip component. After reviewing data on over 3,100 cases, Zimmer concluded that the technology and design parameters of the Durom Cup require a higher degree of precision than the more common hip replacement surgical techniques used in the U.S. Therefore, they have decided that additional instructions and surgical training is necessary before this product is used.

In a statement released on their website, Zimmer states that a thorough check of the Durom Cup, including evaluation of the manufacturing processes, design specifications and product documentation, failed to reveal any evidence of a defect in the artificial hip part.

7 Comments

  • TiekSeptember 1, 2012 at 5:44 am

    What a pleasure to find someone who ideinfteis the issues so clearly

  • kimNovember 22, 2009 at 6:10 pm

    hip keeps dislocating

  • Zimmer Durom Hip Lawsuit Reserves Increased to Cover Claims : AboutLawsuits.comJanuary 30, 2009 at 7:21 pm

    [...] sales for the Zimmer Durom Acetabular Component, which is commonly referred to as a Durom Cup, were suspended in the United States after doctor’s reported high rates of patients who had their hip replacement fail after [...]

  • Zimmer Sets Aside Funds for Durom Hip Implant Lawsuits : AboutLawsuits.comOctober 27, 2008 at 5:53 pm

    [...] July 2008, Zimmer suspended sales of the Durom Acetabular Component, or Durom Cup, after confirming that some clinics using the hip implant were experiencing failure [...]

  • Zimmer Offers Training for Durom Hip Replacement Parts : AboutLawsuits.comSeptember 29, 2008 at 4:49 pm

    [...] some doctors were experiencing hip failure rates of 5.7%. At that time, they indicated that the Zimmer Durom Cup would be reintroduced after revisions were made to the label and a new surgical training program was developed to [...]

  • Zimmer Class Action Suit Filed After Durom Cup Problems : AboutLawsuits.comAugust 12, 2008 at 4:23 pm

    [...] PagesZimmer Durom Cup Sales Suspended Zimmer Durom Cup LawsuitsCeramic Hip Implant Lawsuit Alleges Doctor Influenced by Payments from [...]

  • Zimmer Durom Cup Lawsuits — AboutLawsuits.comJuly 25, 2008 at 3:04 pm

    [...] PagesZimmer Durom Cup Sales Suspended Ceramic Hip Implant Lawsuit Alleges Doctor Influenced by Payments from ManufacturerStryker Trident [...]

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Zimmer Biomet CPT Hip System Linked to Increased Risk of Thigh Bone Fractures, FDA Warns
Zimmer Biomet CPT Hip System Linked to Increased Risk of Thigh Bone Fractures, FDA Warns (Posted today)

The FDA has issued a safety communication warning that Zimmer Biomet CPT hip system femoral stems may increase the risk of femur fractures, calling for doctors to avoid its use when possible.

Change Healthcare Data Breach Lawyers Meeting Today With MDL Judge For Initial Status Conference
Change Healthcare Data Breach Lawyers Meeting Today With MDL Judge For Initial Status Conference (Posted yesterday)

The judge presiding over all Change Healthcare lawsuits filed in federal court is holding the first status conference of the litigation, which is expected to grow significantly as Change Healthcare data breach letters continue to be sent to impacted customers.

Angiodynamics LifePort Lawsuit Filed Over Risk of the Port Catheters Failing, Causing Severe Injury
Angiodynamics LifePort Lawsuit Filed Over Risk of the Port Catheters Failing, Causing Severe Injury (Posted 2 days ago)

Complaint comes as a panel of federal judges are scheduled to hear oral arguments later this month, to determine whether all AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits filed in U.S. District Courts nationwide should be centralized before one judge.