$926K Awarded By Jury in IVC Filter Lawsuit Against Bard

A federal jury in Portland, Oregon has awarded nearly $1 million to a man whose vena cava was perforated by a Bard Eclipse IVC filter, after finding the small device intended to catch blood clots was negligently designed, and that the manufacturer failed to warn patients and the medical community about the potential risks.

C.R. Bard has faced more than 8,000 IVC filter lawsuits in recent years, each involving similar allegations plaintiffs suffered painful and life-threatening complications after receiving Bard Eclipse, Recovery, G2 and other similar products with a retrievable design.

The small, spider-like filters are implanted into the inferior vena cava to prevent blood clots from traveling to the lungs and causing a pulmonary embolism. However, plaintiffs allege design defects cause the devices to move out of position, puncture internal organs or fracture, causing small pieces to travel throughout the body.

Learn More About

IVC Filter Lawsuits

Design Problems with Certain IVC Filters Linked to Severe Injuries. Lawsuits Reviewed Nationwide.

Learn More About this Lawsuit See If You Qualify For Compensation

Given common questions of fact and law raised in complaints filed throughout the federal court system, the Bard IVC filter cases were consolidated as part of a multidistrict litigation (MDL) in 2015, with U.S. District Judge David G. Campbell presiding over coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings. However, after settlements were reached to resolve most cases, Judge Campbell began remanding individual claims to U.S. District Courts nationwide for separate trial dates.

A case brought by Justin Peterson recently went before a jury in the U.S. District Court for the District of Oregon, involving allegations that Peterson suffered damage to his vena cava and duodenum when a Bard Eclipse filter failed. As result, Peterson suffered severe bleeding and required additional surgery to repair the damage, and the filter was removed in 2015.

Following presentation of evidence in the case, a jury determined on Friday that Bard was negligent in designing the Eclipse filter and failed to warn about the potential health risks associated with migration and perforations, awarding Peterson $926,000 in damages.

While the outcome will not have a binding impact on several hundred cases still not settled or resolved, it does provide a signal for how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony which will be presented during trials likely to be held nationwide in the coming months and years.

In addition to the cases filed against Bard, nearly 4,000 Cook IVC filter lawsuits are still pending in a separate MDL, raising nearly identical allegations that devices sold by this competing manufacturer carry similar design defects. In February 2019, an Indiana jury found that Cook Medical should be required to pay $3 million in compensatory damages, and a steady stream of additional cases are expected to go before juries if settlements are not reached in those claims.


  • CarlosOctober 7, 2021 at 8:27 am

    I had 7 surgeries one being bypass about lose my legs don’t know what going on with my case please love to know what’s going on or should I get new lawyers

  • JJuly 30, 2021 at 8:31 am

    I want to know if I can hire another attorney

  • LuisJune 14, 2021 at 5:25 pm

    Please I need to see I been waiting for 4years and I’m not sure what is going on.

  • SheilaMay 27, 2021 at 6:08 pm

    My IVC Filter has penetrated my Inferior Vena Cava and I have had a pending case for over 2 years with nothing. My now lawyer thinks I don't have a case. Can I change lawyers???

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Uber Driver Sexual Assaults and Misconduct Reports Must Be Disclosed in Lawsuit Discovery
Uber Driver Sexual Assaults and Misconduct Reports Must Be Disclosed in Lawsuit Discovery (Posted today)

A federal magistrate judge is forcing Uber to hand over potentially hundreds of thousands of incident files involving reports of passengers who suffered sexual misconduct or sexual assault at the hands of the rideshare service's drivers.

Abbott May Remove Infant Formula for Preemies Off the Market Due to Similac NEC Lawsuits
Abbott May Remove Infant Formula for Preemies Off the Market Due to Similac NEC Lawsuits (Posted yesterday)

Abbott Laboratories is considering removing Similac infant formula products designed for preterm babies from the market, as it faces hundreds of lawsuits claiming the products increase the risk of necrotizing enterocolitis, which puts newborns at a high risk of permanent injuries and death.

Information About Suboxone Dental Claims To Be Exchanged By Parties in MDL
Information About Suboxone Dental Claims To Be Exchanged By Parties in MDL (Posted 2 days ago)

A federal judge has ordered parties involved in Suboxone dental decay lawsuits to submit proposals for exchanging information that will guide the selection of representative bellwether claims for early test trials.