Avastin Side Effects Linked to Increased Risk of Serious Blood Clots

|

A new report published in the Journal of the American Medical Association highlights the increased risk of blood clots associated with Avastin, a drug used to treat cancer. The researchers indicate that findings call for stronger warnings to be added to the drug’s label about the Avastin side effects.

Avastin (bevacizumab), which is marketed by Genentech and Roche, is a cancer drug that blocks tumor growth by preventing formation of new blood vessels which nourish the tumors. Avastin was approved in 2004 for treatment of lung and colon cancer, and it has been found to improve the survival rate when combined with chemotherapy.

According to the research reported by Dr. Shenhong Wu and his colleges at Stony Brook University Cancer center in New York, side effects of Avastin could increase the risk of developing vein blood clots by as much as one third.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

The researchers evaluated data involving nearly 8,000 patients in 15 clinical trials and found that the percentage of people developing venous blood clots was 8.3% among Avastin users and 6.1% in the control group, for an increase in the relative risk of 33%.

The risk of Avastin blood clots was found to vary widely depending on the type of cancer involved, with 19.1% of those with colorectal cancer developing blood clots, 14.9% of non-small-cell lung cancer patients developing clots, 7.3% of breast cancer patients developing blood clots, but only 3% of kidney cancer patients treated with Avastin having blood clots.

According to Wu, a smaller study conducted in 2007 by Genentech, which involved 1,745 people, under estimated the blood clot risk with Avastin. Wu suggests that the Genentech study was too small and that his larger study was more significant and reliable.

Although the researchers indicate that the findings are not a reason for doctors to stop using the cancer drug, it is important for physicians and patients to be aware of the blood clot side effects of Avastin so that methods of preventing and treating blood clots can be reviewed.

The report suggests that information about the Avastin blood clot risk should be moved from its current location on the warning label into a prominently displayed “black box” warning, which would be the strongest warning which can be place on a prescription medication.


2 Comments


Mark
11/09/2016 Had one dose of avastin of Oct 19th, 2016, and ended up in emergency room with “saddle PE” on Nov. 2nd. Was told by 3 different doctors that I had a large clot. Spent 4 days in the hospital and am now taking 2 daily injections of a blood thinner called Enoxaparin for who knows how long. Was not told by any of my doctors that avastin would or could cause clots. The only other option is brain surgery to remove a lesion that is causing swelling and inflammation.

Avastin Gastrointestinal Perforation Risk Confirmed by Study – AboutLawsuits.com
[…] A prior study from Stony Brook in November 2008 indicated that Avastin can also increase the risk of blood clots by as much as one third, leading researchers to call for stronger warnings to be added to the drug’s label about the Avastin blood clot side effects. […]

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A Texas couple has filed a ByHeart formula recall lawsuit after their four-month old contracted infant botulism days before the recall was announced.
A tabletop fire pit lawsuit claims a Rhode Island man suffered catastrophic burn injuries this summer due to manufacturers ignoring safety warnings by federal regulators.