Chesapeake Regional Lawsuits Filed by Nearly 1,000 Women Who May Have Undergone Unnecessary Surgeries
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Maryland Birth Injury Fund Proposed By Lawmakers February 11, 2014 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Maryland legislators are attempting to create a birth injury fund to provide compensation for children and families for health problems that may be caused by medical mistakes during birth. However, the move would limit the ability of families to pursue medical malpractice lawsuits, and serve as a form of tort reform. Dr. Dan K. Morhaim, a member of the Maryland House of Delegates representing Baltimore County, recently proposed a statewide “no fault” birth injury fund. The fund would provide compensation for care to individuals who suffered an injury during birth, while shielding medical personnel and hospitals from jury awards that could provide substantially more compensation. Morhaim suggests that the legislation would actually result in more infants obtaining compensation, because their parents will not have to win a trial to get access to the fund. Do You Know about… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITs Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know Aboutโฆ SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITs Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION “Under this legislation, more babies who suffer birth injuries will get the lifetime care they need because acceptance into the program is based on the injury, not the outcome of a lawsuit,” Morhaim wrote in a letter to other Maryland legislators. Morhaim claims that the fund would help circumvent what he calls a “looming healthcare crisis” for mothers and babies in the state of Maryland. He is basing that in-part off of a Baltimore Business Journal article published in June 2013, which reported that hospitals in the area feel overburdened by the legal risks of childbirth procedures. That same month, Maryland General Hospital closed its obstetrics and gynecology department as part of its restructuring and merger with University of Maryland Medical Center. Local hospitals claim that delivering babies is a profit loss for them, due to high insurance costs and the risk of lawsuits. That is because, in part, Maryland parents have until their child is 21 to file a birth injury lawsuit against a hospital or healthcare personnel. Critics of the legislation point out that the bill would shield bad doctors and hospitals that provide substandard care, putting more unborn children at risk of birth injuries. They maintain that efforts should be focused on preventing birth injuries through improved medical care, rather than providing negligent doctors and hospitals with immunity from the consequences of their poor care. Eligibility for the Maryland birth injury program would be restricted to children born in a Maryland hospital, whose injuries fit the definition of a birth-related neurological injury. An administrative law judge would make the eligibility determination and there would be an appeals process in place. Once approved, the child and their parents could see compensation and care from the fund in under 90 days. The fund would include a one-time award of up to $100,000, plus lifetime medical care, lost earnings compensation for the years 18 to 65 and no cap on the health care benefits. Each case would be reviewed by the Maryland Department of Health and Mental Hygiene and the Maryland Board of Physicians, who would review hospitals and doctors, respectively, for indications of substandard care. The program would be funded in its entirety by hospitals and doctors, Morhaim claims. Johns Hopkins Hospital and the University of Maryland Medical System have already thrown their support behind the bill. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Birth Injury, Maryland, Medical Malpractice More Lawsuit Stories Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks March 10, 2026 Uber Sexual Assault MDL Judge Considered Expanding Jury Pool in Next Bellwether Trial March 10, 2026 Chesapeake Regional Lawsuits Filed by Nearly 1,000 Women Who May Have Undergone Unnecessary Surgeries March 10, 2026 0 Comments EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (Posted: yesterday) An Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit filed by three women says the product was defectively designed, inappropriately approved by the FDA, and left them with severe injuries, worsening pain and the need for removal surgery. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Airport Body Scanner Destroyed Woman’s Spinal Cord Stimulator, Requiring Surgical Removal (03/03/2026)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Unnecessary Shocking Sensations (02/27/2026)Boston Scientific Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Life-Threatening Situation (02/25/2026) Dupixent Mycosis Fungoides Lawsuit Filed Over Failure To Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Risks (Posted: 2 days ago) A Georgia couple’s lawsuit claims the makers of Dupixent failed to provide adequate warnings about the risk of mycosis fungoides, a type of T-cell lymphoma. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Caused T-Cell Lymphoma or Rapidly Progressed Cancer, Lawsuit Alleges (02/25/2026)MDL Sought for Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuits Filed in Federal Courts Nationwide (02/19/2026)Lawsuit Claims Dupixent for Atopic Dermatitis, Eczema Treatment Caused CTCL (02/10/2026) Port Catheter Lawyers Outline Process for Selecting Bellwether Lawsuits in AngioDynamics MDL (Posted: 5 days ago) In a joint statement, plaintiffs and defendants in AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits have laid guidelines for what types of cases should be selected to serve as potential bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Blood Clot Results in Lawsuit Against Device Manufacturer (02/04/2026)SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges AngioDynamics Catheter Defects Forced Surgical Removal (01/30/2026)Severe Sepsis Infection Leads to Vortex Port Catheter Wrongful Death Lawsuit (01/12/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks March 10, 2026
Chesapeake Regional Lawsuits Filed by Nearly 1,000 Women Who May Have Undergone Unnecessary Surgeries March 10, 2026
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Defects Caused Lead Migration, Electric Shocks (Posted: yesterday) An Abbott spinal cord stimulator lawsuit filed by three women says the product was defectively designed, inappropriately approved by the FDA, and left them with severe injuries, worsening pain and the need for removal surgery. MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Airport Body Scanner Destroyed Woman’s Spinal Cord Stimulator, Requiring Surgical Removal (03/03/2026)Medtronic Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Unnecessary Shocking Sensations (02/27/2026)Boston Scientific Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Recalled Device Caused Life-Threatening Situation (02/25/2026)
Dupixent Mycosis Fungoides Lawsuit Filed Over Failure To Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Risks (Posted: 2 days ago) A Georgia couple’s lawsuit claims the makers of Dupixent failed to provide adequate warnings about the risk of mycosis fungoides, a type of T-cell lymphoma. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Caused T-Cell Lymphoma or Rapidly Progressed Cancer, Lawsuit Alleges (02/25/2026)MDL Sought for Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuits Filed in Federal Courts Nationwide (02/19/2026)Lawsuit Claims Dupixent for Atopic Dermatitis, Eczema Treatment Caused CTCL (02/10/2026)
Port Catheter Lawyers Outline Process for Selecting Bellwether Lawsuits in AngioDynamics MDL (Posted: 5 days ago) In a joint statement, plaintiffs and defendants in AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits have laid guidelines for what types of cases should be selected to serve as potential bellwether trials. MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Blood Clot Results in Lawsuit Against Device Manufacturer (02/04/2026)SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges AngioDynamics Catheter Defects Forced Surgical Removal (01/30/2026)Severe Sepsis Infection Leads to Vortex Port Catheter Wrongful Death Lawsuit (01/12/2026)