AMD Class Action Lawsuit Filed Over Security Flaws

The computer processor and component manufacturer Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) faces a class action lawsuit over alleged security flaws, known as Spectre and Meltdown, which could make a wide number of electronic devices susceptible to hacking.ย 

The complaint (PDF) was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California on January 16, naming AMD, Lisa T. Su, and Devinder Kumar as defendants. Su is the company’s chief executive officer (CEO), and Kumar is the chief financial officer (CFO), senior vice president and treasurer.

These two exploits are known as โ€œMeltdownโ€, allowing access to things like passwords and other information by cutting between an operating system and an application; and โ€œSpectreโ€, which causes applications to leak information between programs that are usually isolated from one another, making data easier to steal.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

Both exploits are believed to be accessible in every Intel and AMD chip made, and could put most peopleโ€™s private data at risk. Some experts estimate that almost every CPU manufactured in the last 10 to 20 years may be affected.

In an effort to fix these problems, a number of companies have released automatic โ€œupdatesโ€ for computers, servers, cell phones and operating systems. However, these updates appear to cause the processing chips, the brains of computerized devices, to slow down anywhere from five to 30 percent.

Since news of the exploits and the patches began to spread, at least five Intel chip lawsuits have been filed in U.S. District Courts nationwide, alleging the company has violated warranty laws and state deceptive trade practice laws. That number is expected to increase significantly in the coming weeks and months.

The lawsuit against AMD is similar to cases filed against Intel for the same security flaws. However, this AMD class action lawsuit is filed on behalf of investors who say that the company misrepresented the value of its stock because it knew about, and failed to reveal, the security flaw in its processors.

“Throughout the Class Period, Defendants made materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s business, operational and compliance policies,” the lawsuit states. “Specifically, Defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) a fundamental security flaw in AMD’s processor chips renders them susceptible to hacking; and (ii) as a result, AMD’s public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times.”

The class action seeks to represent anyone who purchased or acquired AMD shares between February 21, 2017 and January 11, 2018. It presents claims of violations of the Security Exchange Commission Exchange Act and Rule.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

The second Bard PowerPort bellwether trial is now scheduled to begin in August after the plaintiff in a claim originally planned for trial next month died, and her family stopped pursuing litigation.
A Delaware woman has filed a Dupixent lawsuit, claiming manufacturers promoted the eczema drug as a breakthrough treatment while failing to warn that it may trigger or worsen CTCL, a rare form of non-Hodgkinโ€™s lymphoma.
Federal regulators have expanded an Omnipod recall after reports that internal tubing defects may cause insulin leaks and under-delivery, potentially triggering dangerous blood sugar spikes.