Firefighter Turnout Gear Lawsuits Belong in MDL With Other AFFF and PFAS Exposure Lawsuits, Judge Indicates
Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Hershey’s Bubble Yum Class Action Lawsuit Claims Gum Contains Toxic PFAS ChemicalsIndependent testing found levels of PFAS in Bubble Yum gum that could lead to adverse health consequences for consumers, especially children. October 31, 2024 Michael Adams Add Your CommentsA California man has filed a lawsuit against the Hershey Company, alleging that Bubble Yum bubble gum contains levels of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) that exceed safe limits established by state law, potentially exposing him and countless others to serious health risks.PFAS are toxic chemicals that are resistant to grease, water and oil, which are widely used in consumer packaging materials, fabrics, Teflon and a number of other products. Since they are known to take a long time to degrade inside human bodies and the environment, PFAS are commonly referred to as “forever chemicals,” and have been linked to a risk of several serious health complications, including kidney cancer, thyroid disease, testicular cancer and ulcerative colitis.In recent years, concerns about exposure to toxic PFAS chemicals has gained a great deal of attention, due to widespread water contamination caused by high levels in aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) used for decades by civilian and military firefighters.As a result of the chemical manufacturers’ failure to disclose the health risks, thousands of AFFF lawsuits are currently being pursued by firefighters diagnosed with cancer following direct exposure to the chemicals, as well as PFAS drinking water contamination lawsuits brought by individuals living in areas with high levels of the chemicals in the water supply. However, there is also growing evidence that consumers are exposed to these chemicals from a wide variety of potential sources.Firefighting Foam LawsuitsWere you or a loved one exposed to toxic AFFF Chemicals?Lawyers are reviewing aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) lawsuits for firefighters, military personnel and individuals who developed cancer or other health issues from exposure to toxic firefighting foam chemicals.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONFirefighting Foam LawsuitsWere you or a loved one exposed to toxic AFFF Chemicals?Lawyers are reviewing aqueous film forming foam (AFFF) lawsuits for firefighters, military personnel and individuals who developed cancer or other health issues from exposure to toxic firefighting foam chemicals.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONBubble Yum PFAS Lawsuit Filed in CaliforniaIn a complaint (PDF) filed in the California Superior Court for the County of Los Angeles on October 24, Abraham Mohamed indicates that both pieces of Bubble Yum bubble gum and the wrappers used in the packaging material contain potentially dangerous levels of PFAS chemicals.Mohamed seeks class action status to pursue damages for all California residents who purchased Bubble Yum over the past four years, indicating that independent laboratory testing confirmed the bubble gum contains PFAS at levels that have been deemed unsafe by the State of California.The lawsuit indicates that the Hershey’s Bubble Yum bubble gum was tested for organic fluorine, a known PFAS marker. The independent lab conducted two rounds of testing, measuring the organic fluorine levels in both the gum and its wrapper.In the first round, organic fluorine levels of 197 parts per million (ppm) were found in the gum, and 130 ppm in the wrapper. In the second round, 75.19 ppm of organic fluorine were found in the gum, and 122 ppm in the wrapper. These levels exceed California’s regulatory limit for PFAS content, set at 100 ppm by California Health and Safety Codes §108945, 108946 and 109000.As a result of the findings, Mohamed argues that Hershey has falsely and misleadingly marketed Bubble Yum, by failing to disclose that the levels of PFAS in the gum violate California consumer protection laws. The manufacturer also neglected consumer health and safety, by failing to disclose the presence of potentially toxic ingredients in the gum, according to the Bubble Yum class action lawsuit.These claims are especially concerning since Hershey markets Bubble Yum to children, who may face a greater risk from PFAS chemicals due to the potential for hormone disruption, developmental issues and immune system impairment, Mohamed points out.“Defendant has exclusive knowledge of the manufacturing process and composition of materials and chemicals in the Product (Bubble Yum gum) as Defendant is the manufacturer, distributor, and marketer of the Product,” Mohamed said in the complaint. “At the time of purchase, Plaintiff lacked the knowledge of the manufacturing process and composition of materials and chemicals in the Product and lacked the expertise to ascertain the existence of organic fluorine in the Product and their risks to human health.”In the complaint, Mohamed is asking that Hershey disclose the presence of organic fluorine in Bubble Yum gum and provide warnings about its potential health risks. He is also seeking to force the company to test Bubble Yum for PFAS chemicals, and reduce levels in the product to comply with California regulations.In addition, Mohamed seeks monetary damages and restitution, as well as additional protections to help consumers make more informed choices when buying Bubble Yum gum.PFAS Lawsuits Continue To Be FiledMohamed’s complaint takes its place among a series of lawsuits filed in state and federal courts against manufacturers who have not taken into account the presence of PFAS chemicals in their products.Earlier this month, an environmental group filed a Carefree Pad Liner lawsuit in California Superior Court over PFAS chemicals in the company’s panty liners, on the exact same day that California Governor Gavin Newsom signed into law a bill banning the chemicals in feminine hygiene products.In addition, all federal lawsuits over PFAS in AFFF have been centralized and consolidated for pretrial proceedings before U.S. District Judge Richard M. Gergel in the District of South Carolina, where a small group of PFAS personal injury lawsuits are being prepared for trial dates in 2025.These bellwether trials will involve claims brought by individuals who developed testicular cancer, kidney cancer, liver cancer, thyroid cancer, thyroid disease or ulcerative colitis, after drinking water known to have been contaminated by AFFF with high levels of PFAS chemicals. While the outcomes will not be binding on other claims, they are designed to help gauge how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony regarding the link between exposure to PFAS and health risks consumers may face. Written by: Michael AdamsSenior Editor & JournalistMichael Adams is a senior editor and legal journalist at AboutLawsuits.com with over 20 years of experience covering financial, legal, and consumer protection issues. He previously held editorial leadership roles at Forbes Advisor and contributes original reporting on class actions, cybersecurity litigation, and emerging lawsuits impacting consumers. Tags: AFFF, Bubble Yum, California, Cancer, Kidney Cancer, Liver Cancer, PFAS, Thyroid Cancer, Thyroid Disease, Ulcerative Colitis Image Credit: Shutterstock Find Out If You Qualify for A AFFF Lawsuit SettlementMore Firefighting Foam Lawsuit Stories Firefighter Turnout Gear Lawsuits Warrant New MDL Over PFAS Risks: Motion May 18, 2026 Three AFFF Ulcerative Colitis Lawsuits Selected for Tier 2 Bellwether Trials September 16, 2025 Firefighter Turnout Gear Lawsuits Belong in MDL With Other AFFF and PFAS Exposure Lawsuits, Judge Indicates August 28, 2025 0 Comments PhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot (Posted: 3 days ago)Five plaintiffs say they all suffered dental problems due to the side effects of Suboxone, which could have been avoided with adequate warnings.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (06/11/2026)Suboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026) Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use (Posted: 4 days ago)The makers of Dupixent face a CTCL lawsuit by a man who says he developed the rare form of cancer less than a year after beginning treatment with the eczema drug.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITRezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis (06/12/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuits Consolidated in MDL Over CTCL Diagnoses (06/09/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (06/04/2026) Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: 5 days ago)Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (06/12/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)
Firefighter Turnout Gear Lawsuits Belong in MDL With Other AFFF and PFAS Exposure Lawsuits, Judge Indicates August 28, 2025
Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot (Posted: 3 days ago)Five plaintiffs say they all suffered dental problems due to the side effects of Suboxone, which could have been avoided with adequate warnings.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (06/11/2026)Suboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)
Lawsuit Claims Dupixent Cancer Diagnosis Occurred After Only 8 Months of Use (Posted: 4 days ago)The makers of Dupixent face a CTCL lawsuit by a man who says he developed the rare form of cancer less than a year after beginning treatment with the eczema drug.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITRezurock Lawsuit Claims GVHD Medication Caused Debilitating Skin Condition, Prurigo Nodularis (06/12/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuits Consolidated in MDL Over CTCL Diagnoses (06/09/2026)Dupixent Injection Lawsuit Alleges Manufacturer Failed to Warn About T-Cell Lymphoma Cancer Side Effects (06/04/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: 5 days ago)Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (06/12/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)