Arthrex Knee Replacement Lawsuit Filed Over Problems With iBalance System

  • Written by: Irvin Jackson
  • 1 Comment

Contact A Lawyer

Have A Potential Case Reviewed By An Attorney

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

According to allegations raised in a recently filed product liability lawsuit, problems with an Arthrex iBalance knee replacement caused an Arkansas woman to experience complications only a few months after the device implanted, resulting in the need for revision surgery.

The complaint (PDF) was filed by Angela Owen in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Arkansas on February 25, indicating that Arthrex, Inc. manufactured and sold defective components, which were unreasonably dangerous and prone to fail.

Owen underwent total left knee replacement in November 2015, at which time an Arthrex iBalance knee system was implanted by her surgeon. However, following the procedure, she suffered severe pain, swelling and numbness around the knee and her surgeon removed the implant in April 2016.

During the surgery to remove the implant, the doctor noted that the tibial tray was extremely loose. The surgery occurred just a month after the FDA announced an Arthrex iBalance knee replacement recall, which impacted about 2,300 units in March 2016, because some of them had a smooth outer surface which should have been textured. Those textured surfaces were designed to help with the cement bonding process of the tibial tray.

It is unclear whether her implant involved in the lawsuit was one of those recalled knee replacements. However, Arthrex iBalance tibial tray problems have been reported separate of the recall. Owen’s lawsuit indicates that there is a problem with the design of the knee replacement system which results in a high early failure rate.

“The Arthrex iBalance, as manufactured and/or supplied by Defendant, was defective due to its high early failure rate. Defendant knew or should have known that the product created significant risks of serious bodily harm to consumers, as alleged herein, and it failed to adequately warn consumers and/or their health care professionals of such risks,” the lawsuit states. “The benefits of the Arthrex iBalance do not outweigh the risks inherent in the design and configuration of the Arthrex iBalance.”

Over the past year, a growing number of knee replacement lawsuits have been brought by individuals who experienced problems with Arthrex iBalance imlpants, as well as several different types of systems that have been widely used in recent years.

Similar tibial failures have also been cited in recent DePuy Attune Knee lawsuits, as well as complaints over the Exactech Optetrak Total Knee Replacement System. In both cases, plaintiffs say that problems with tibial loosening resulted in implant failures.

Tags: , , , , , ,

1 comment

  1. Cindy clark Reply

    contacted your firm in 2018-2019 when we first found the arthrex bio degradable arthrex screws desolved most al the bone in my knee after a acl replacement in 2009
    I have went thru serval attempts Acl in wrong place , bone infection , graft failure , bone reject dowels and have got larger
    And weaker
    I am now to every thing removed from knee trying to let heal
    No Acl , been striped and flushed due to bone infection and may not be Eligible for a cone knee replacement due to the damage previously from arthrex screws
    I am 50 have 4 kids use to be very active now take anti depression pills over weight and a things not looking good
    Here is my knee when we found damage in 2017

    Thank you here it is in 2020
    Prior clean out and stripped most infection , bone decay and bone dowels
    I have a lot of records and dr who will

  • Share Your Comments

  • Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

    Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.
  • NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Contact A Lawyer

Contact A Lawyer

Have A Potential Case Reviewed By An Attorney

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.