Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
Avandia REMS Program Modified by FDA to Loosen Restrictions November 26, 2013 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments In a controversial turnaround, federal drug regulators have agreed to modify the Risk Evaluation and Mitigation Strategy (REMS) program for Avandia, removing restrictions on who can receive the diabetes drug. The decision comes two and a half years after numerous health experts indicated that the GlaxoSmithKline diabetes drug may have caused tens of thousands of heart attacks and recommended restrictions that have virtually ended all prescriptions for the medication. On November 25, the FDA announced that it is removing some Avandia prescribing and dispensing restrictions; primarily those involving the Avandia REMS Program. Do You Know about… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Do You Know About… SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITS FOR YOUNG ADULTS Gambling addiction and severe financial losses have been linked to popular sports betting platforms like DraftKings, FanDuel, and Caesars. Lawsuits are being filed by young adults and students who were targeted by deceptive promotions, addictive app features, and aggressive marketing tactics. See if you qualify for a sports betting addiction lawsuit. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION The decision was anticipated after an FDA advisory committee met over the summer to discuss the Avandia restrictions, determining that the agency was wrong to restrict the drug and that data indicates that there may be no significantly increased risk of heart attacks with Avandia. However, the advisory panel has been sharply criticized by many, including the doctor who first raised the alarm bell about Avandia. Critics have suggested that the agency is trying to save face after it failed to initially protect the public from the potential side effects of Avandia. “Our actions today reflect the most current scientific knowledge about the risks and benefits of this drug,” Janet Woodcock, M.D., director of the FDA Center for Drug Evaluation and Research said in a press release. “Given these new results, our level of concern is considerably reduced, thus we are requiring the removal of certain prescribing restrictions.” The changes to the Avandia REMS program includes removal of restrictions limiting the drug to certain patients and the removal of certain warning label information. Health care professionals will also no longer be required to enroll in the Avandia REMS program before prescribing the drug, essentially eliminating the program altogether. However, the FDA is leaving in place requirements that GlaxoSmithKline and generic Avandia manufacturers provide training to health care providers on the potential heart risks of Avandia, noting that there is still some “scientific uncertainty” regarding the drug’s risks. The move was long predicted by Dr. Steven E. Nissen, who warned of Avandia heart problems in a 2007 meta-analysis. Nissen, chairman of the Department of Cardiovascular Medicine at the Cleveland Clinic, said earlier this year that the FDA would drop restrictions on the drug to save face, knowing that there was almost no way an Avandia come back was possible at this point. The FDA initiated a review of the drug without any request from GlaxoSmithKline that the agency do so. Drug Trials Questioned The decision was based off of a re-evaluation of a widely discredited clinical trial known as RECORD, which originally indicated that Avandia was free of any significant heart attack risk. The trial was heavily criticized at the time the results were released, as it was unblinded, meaning doctors and GlaxoSmithKline knew which patients were receiving the drug and which were not. In addition, one FDA reviewer, Thomas Marciniak, discovered that the company went in and deleted or changed data to make Avandia appear less likely to cause heart attacks. Despite the flaws, Duke University researchers “re-adjudicated” the study, looking at the data anew and determined again that there was no Avandia heart attack risk and that the Avandia REMS program was unnecessary. In 2012, GlaxoSmithKline plead guilty to Justice Department charges that it tried to illegally market Avandia and paid fines of about $3 billion. It also paid millions to states for charges that it defrauded their health care programs by failing to provide adequate warning of Avandia heart attacks. Some reports have suggested that as many as 100,000 heart attacks may have been caused by Avandia, and the drug’s manufacturer has reportedly paid more than $1 billion to settle Avandia heart attack lawsuits brought by former users of the medication who allege inadequate warnings were provided to consumers and the medical community. Tags: Avandia, Diabetes, Diabetes Drug, GlaxoSmithKline, Heart Attacks, REMS More Lawsuit Stories Depo-Provera Shots Triple Brain Tumor Risks Compared to Birth Control Pill: Study July 11, 2025 Cancer-Causing PFAS Water Contamination in 98% of Tested Sites in U.S.: Report July 11, 2025 Lawsuit Alleges Risperdal, Zyprexa Caused Breast Cancer Diagnosis July 11, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermPhoneThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Shots Triple Brain Tumor Risks Compared to Birth Control Pill: Study (Posted: today) Canadian researchers say receiving Depo-Provera injections for more than a year triples the risk of brain tumors compared to women who take birth control pills. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Pre-Settlement Funding and Loans Must Be Disclosed Under Court Order (07/09/2025)Depo-Provera Wrongful Death Lawsuit Blames Injections for Fatal Brain Tumor (07/02/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera DMPA Injection Increases Brain Tumor Risks (06/20/2025) Uber Faces Lawsuit Indicating Driver Raped Passenger After Using Wife’s Account (Posted: yesterday) A lawsuit filed by a Florida woman says she was raped after an Uber driver’s husband showed up behind the wheel. MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITUber Driver Background Check Materials Must Be Produced in Sexual Assault Lawsuits: Court (06/17/2025)MDL Judge Updated on Uber Driver Sex Assault Lawsuit Status as Claims Top 2,800 (06/06/2025)Uber Seeks To Transfer MDL Sexual Assault Lawsuits to Districts Where Attacks Occurred for Trial (05/23/2025) Depo-Provera Lawsuit Pre-Settlement Funding and Loans Must Be Disclosed Under Court Order (Posted: 2 days ago) A U.S. District Judge has ordered women involved in Depo-Provera lawsuits to inform him of any third-party pre-settlement loans they take out, as predatory interest rates may force them to reject settlement offers. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Shots Triple Brain Tumor Risks Compared to Birth Control Pill: Study (07/11/2025)Depo-Provera Wrongful Death Lawsuit Blames Injections for Fatal Brain Tumor (07/02/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera DMPA Injection Increases Brain Tumor Risks (06/20/2025)
Depo-Provera Shots Triple Brain Tumor Risks Compared to Birth Control Pill: Study (Posted: today) Canadian researchers say receiving Depo-Provera injections for more than a year triples the risk of brain tumors compared to women who take birth control pills. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Lawsuit Pre-Settlement Funding and Loans Must Be Disclosed Under Court Order (07/09/2025)Depo-Provera Wrongful Death Lawsuit Blames Injections for Fatal Brain Tumor (07/02/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera DMPA Injection Increases Brain Tumor Risks (06/20/2025)
Uber Faces Lawsuit Indicating Driver Raped Passenger After Using Wife’s Account (Posted: yesterday) A lawsuit filed by a Florida woman says she was raped after an Uber driver’s husband showed up behind the wheel. MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITUber Driver Background Check Materials Must Be Produced in Sexual Assault Lawsuits: Court (06/17/2025)MDL Judge Updated on Uber Driver Sex Assault Lawsuit Status as Claims Top 2,800 (06/06/2025)Uber Seeks To Transfer MDL Sexual Assault Lawsuits to Districts Where Attacks Occurred for Trial (05/23/2025)
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Pre-Settlement Funding and Loans Must Be Disclosed Under Court Order (Posted: 2 days ago) A U.S. District Judge has ordered women involved in Depo-Provera lawsuits to inform him of any third-party pre-settlement loans they take out, as predatory interest rates may force them to reject settlement offers. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Shots Triple Brain Tumor Risks Compared to Birth Control Pill: Study (07/11/2025)Depo-Provera Wrongful Death Lawsuit Blames Injections for Fatal Brain Tumor (07/02/2025)Lawsuit Alleges Depo-Provera DMPA Injection Increases Brain Tumor Risks (06/20/2025)