Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Change Healthcare Lawsuit Lawyers are reviewing Change Healthcare class action lawsuits for individuals who had their personal information stolen due to the data breach.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
AngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Processed Food Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued against the food industry over their manufacturing and advertising of ultra-processed foods, which have caused a generation of children to face an increased risk of developing childhood diabetes and other chronic illnesses.
Johnson & Johnson Denies Baby Powder Asbestos Contamination, But FDA Stands By Test Results October 30, 2019 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments After the FDA reported earlier this month that asbestos was found in Johnson’s Baby Powder, Johnson & Johnson claims that its own testing of the same samples has found no evidence of contamination. However, it appears that federal regulators are standing by their test results, which has highlighted serious concerns about the safety of talcum powder products. On October 18, a nationwide Baby Powder recall was issued after the FDA detected sub-trace levels of chrysotile asbestos in the talc-based powder, contradicting years of claims by Johnson & Johnson that their products do not contain the cancer-causing fibers. Johnson & Johnson currently faces thousands of Baby Powder lawsuits, involving allegations that asbestos and talc in the product resulted in the development of mesothelioma, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Learn More About Talcum Powder Lawsuits Talcum powder or talc powder may cause women to develop ovarian cancer. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Learn More About Talcum Powder Lawsuits Talcum powder or talc powder may cause women to develop ovarian cancer. Learn More SEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATION Although evidence uncovered during the litigation has suggested that the manufacturer was aware for decades that asbestos may be present in the talc ingredients, Johnson & Johnson has continued to defend the safety of their popular baby powder, and refused to provide warnings to consumers about the potential cancer risk from talcum powder exposure. In a press release issued on Tuesday, Johnson & Johnson indicates that it had 15 tests conducted on the same sample used by the FDA, and another 48 tests on samples from the same lot it was forced to recall, and claims that they did not find any evidence of asbestos. In response to the claims made by the manufacturer, a report by Reuters News suggests that FDA officials are standing by their own testing and findings. “They would say the product is free of asbestos based on their testing, and we would say the opposite for that sample,” according to a quote provided to Reuters by Steve Musser, the deputy director for scientific operations at the FDA Center for Food Safety and Nutrition. Reuters also revealed that Johnson & Johnson’s claims the sample is asbestos free goes against the findings of one of its own expert witnesses. According to Reuters, it turns out that the private lab which did the testing for the FDA and found the asbestos, was run by Andreas Saldivar, who is a paid expert witness for Johnson & Johnson. Saldivar, director of the laboratory at AMA Analytical Services Inc., did not know he was testing Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder when he tested the unmarked sample. He has previously testified in court that Johnson & Johnson’s talc did not contain asbestos. Now, he may be called upon in future cases to testify the exact opposite, particularly since Johnson & Johnson now claims his testing methodologies were faulty and led to the sample becoming contaminated. Johnson & Johnson’s stock price fell sharply earlier this month, over concerns about the liability the company will face in light of the asbestos discovered in talc. Following the press release issued yesterday, the share price has begun to recover, but it remains unclear what impact these findings will have on thousands of lawsuits moving through the federal court system. Johnson & Johnson Talcum Powder Litigation Johnson & Johnson currently faces about 13,000 product liability lawsuits brought by adult women who allege the developed ovarian cancer, mesothelioma or other injuries following years of exposure to talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder, Shower-to-Shower or other products. While a number of cases have resulted in massive damage awards in state courts, after juries found that there was compelling evidence that Johnson & Johnson failed to warn consumers about the risks associated with their product, most of the claims are currently pending in the federal court system, where a U.S. District Judge is currently considering whether expert witness testimony proposed by plaintiffs is sufficiently reliable to permit the cases to proceed to trial. Last week, plaintiffs attorneys indicated that they intend to supplement prior briefings in light of the FDA discovery that asbestos was found in Johnson’s Baby Powder. If Johnson & Johnson is unable to disqualify plaintiffs expert witnesses in the federal court system, it is expected that a series of “bellwether” cases will be scheduled for trial, to gauge how juries respond to certain evidence and testimony that is presented in the federal litigation, and the company will face increasing pressure to consider negotiating talcum powder cancer settlements if they are unable to successfully defend the claims at trial. Tags: Asbestos, Baby Powder Recall, Johnson & Johnson, Mesothelioma, Ovarian Cancer, Shower to Shower, Talc, Talcum Powder Image Credit: | More Talcum Powder Lawsuit Stories Talc Safety To Be Subject of New Independent Scientific Expert Panel Led by FDA May 22, 2025 Talcum Powder MDL Lawsuits Get Underway Again, After J&J Bankruptcy Rejected April 9, 2025 Judge Rejects J&J’s Third Bankruptcy Filing, Killing $9B Talcum Powder Settlement April 1, 2025 0 Comments Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermCommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged. Δ MORE TOP STORIES Zantac Cancer Lawsuits Continue To Be Filed More Than 5 Years After Recall (Posted: 2 days ago) A man diagnosed with multiple forms of cancer has filed a Zantac lawsuit, blaming Boehringer Ingelheim for failing to adequately warn about the recalled heartburn drug’s health risks. MORE ABOUT: ZANTAC CANCER LAWSUITSJury Hears Zantac Cancer Evidence in Illinois Trial Against Boehringer Ingelheim (02/05/2025)Zantac Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Trial Ends With Hung Jury in California (11/22/2024)GSK To Pay $2.2 Billion To Settle Zantac Cancer Lawsuits Brought by 80,000 Consumers (10/10/2024) Enfamil NEC Lawsuit Filed After Newborn Suffers ‘Nearly Total Bowel Necrosis’ (Posted: 3 days ago) Necrotizing enterocolitis caused by Enfamil resulted in a newborn suffering life-long bowel injuries, according to a lawsuit filed by his mother. MORE ABOUT: ENFAMIL AND SIMILAC BABY FORMULA LAWSUITReckitt Benckiser Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Enfamil NEC Risks (06/12/2025)NEC Infant Formula Lawyers To Meet With MDL Judge Following Dismissal of First Bellwether Trial (05/29/2025)FDA To Investigate Whether Infant Formula Products Provide Enough Nutrition (05/16/2025) Judge To Meet With Hair Dye Lawyers in Bladder Cancer Lawsuit for Initial Status Conference (Posted: 4 days ago) A California judge has ordered parties involved in a hair dye bladder cancer lawsuit filed against major cosmetic companies to meet for the first time this week to discuss the case. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Paul Mitchell, Redken, Other Hair Dyes Led to Bladder Cancer Diagnosis for Hairdresser (05/09/2025)Salon Stylist Files Lawsuit Over Bladder Cancer From Hair Dye Products (05/02/2025)Hair Color Lawsuit Alleges Bladder Cancer Caused by Salon Dye (04/25/2025)
Zantac Cancer Lawsuits Continue To Be Filed More Than 5 Years After Recall (Posted: 2 days ago) A man diagnosed with multiple forms of cancer has filed a Zantac lawsuit, blaming Boehringer Ingelheim for failing to adequately warn about the recalled heartburn drug’s health risks. MORE ABOUT: ZANTAC CANCER LAWSUITSJury Hears Zantac Cancer Evidence in Illinois Trial Against Boehringer Ingelheim (02/05/2025)Zantac Bladder Cancer Lawsuit Trial Ends With Hung Jury in California (11/22/2024)GSK To Pay $2.2 Billion To Settle Zantac Cancer Lawsuits Brought by 80,000 Consumers (10/10/2024)
Enfamil NEC Lawsuit Filed After Newborn Suffers ‘Nearly Total Bowel Necrosis’ (Posted: 3 days ago) Necrotizing enterocolitis caused by Enfamil resulted in a newborn suffering life-long bowel injuries, according to a lawsuit filed by his mother. MORE ABOUT: ENFAMIL AND SIMILAC BABY FORMULA LAWSUITReckitt Benckiser Faces Class Action Lawsuit Over Enfamil NEC Risks (06/12/2025)NEC Infant Formula Lawyers To Meet With MDL Judge Following Dismissal of First Bellwether Trial (05/29/2025)FDA To Investigate Whether Infant Formula Products Provide Enough Nutrition (05/16/2025)
Judge To Meet With Hair Dye Lawyers in Bladder Cancer Lawsuit for Initial Status Conference (Posted: 4 days ago) A California judge has ordered parties involved in a hair dye bladder cancer lawsuit filed against major cosmetic companies to meet for the first time this week to discuss the case. MORE ABOUT: HAIR DYE LAWSUITLawsuit Claims Paul Mitchell, Redken, Other Hair Dyes Led to Bladder Cancer Diagnosis for Hairdresser (05/09/2025)Salon Stylist Files Lawsuit Over Bladder Cancer From Hair Dye Products (05/02/2025)Hair Color Lawsuit Alleges Bladder Cancer Caused by Salon Dye (04/25/2025)