Baby Rattle Recall: Potential Choking Hazard for Infants

|

The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) and Infantino, LLC., have announced that they are expanding a prior baby rattle recall first issued in March 2008, bringing the total number of Infantino Lamb and Lion Rattles recalled to about 131,000.

The baby rattles contain a tail-piece which can detach, potentially resulting in a choking hazard.

In March 2008, approximately 20,000 Infantino Lamb Grabby Rattles were recalled after reports of at least 8 rattles having the tail-piece come off.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

Since that time, at least 10 additional reports have been received by Infantino, leading to the expansion of the recall to also include another 111,000 Infantino Lion Grabby Rattles.

The recalled rattles are shaped like a brightly colored lamb or a lion with a body shaped like a ring. An elliptical Infantino logo is stamped on the animalโ€™s front right foot.

Units without tails on the animals and those with production codes 0108 and 0508 are not affected by the recall. The production code is located behind the ear and resembles a dial with the year (08) in the middle of the circle and an arrow pointing towards the number on the circle(01 or 05) indicating the month.

The rattles have been sold throughout the United States since May 2007 at Babies “R” Us, Wal-Mart and other stores for between $3 and $4.

Parents have been urged to take the recalled baby rattles away from their children and to contact Intantino for a free replacement rattle or product of equal value by calling (888) 808-3111 or visiting www.infantino.com.


0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

A new claim against Boston Scientific joins a growing number of spinal cord stimulator lawsuits alleging the systems have failed to relieve pain and instead worsened symptoms for many individuals.
A federal judge has selected 10 hair relaxer lawsuits to serve as potential bellwether trials after altering the selection process to eliminate non-representative cases.
A Depo-Provera lawsuit indicates that a Washington state woman must receive ongoing medical monitoring and brain scans due to a high-risk brain tumor allegedly caused by the birth control shot.