Biocell Breast Implant Recall Should Have Come With Coverage of Removal Costs, Lawsuit Claims

Following a nationwide recall for Allergan Biocell breast implants issued last year, after the discovery that women may face a risk of cancer from the macrotextured design, a number of women are now pursuing lawsuits that seek to force the manufacturer to pay for the costs associated with removal of the breast implants.

Allergan announced the breast implant recall in July 2019, after federal regulators determined the textured Biocell design may be responsible for cases of breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL), involving a rare type of non-Hodgkins lymphoma that may surface in the tissue surrounding the implant.

While the manufacturer currently faces dozens of lawsuits brought on behalf of women who developed the the breast implant cancer, a growing number of claims are also being pursued by women who decided to have the implants removed after learning about the potential risk, but were forced to cover their own medical costs.

Learn More About

Breast Implant Lawsuits

Women may face a risk of Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma (ALCL) from certain breast implants.


In a complaint (PDF) filed last month on the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California, Linda Hearne indicates that she had her breast implants removed in January 2020, after she learned about the recall and the risk of BIA-ALCL. However, Hearne indicates she had to pay for the removal on her breast implants after Allergan announced that it would not provide any surgical fee assistance for patients.

“Plaintiff had to pay out-of-pocket for the removal of the dangerous textured breast implant because Allergan has refused to do so,” according to the lawsuit. “Plaintiff has worried about the risks she faces, has also been subject to out-of-pocket expenses in relation to seeking medical advice, evaluating the flawed product implanted into her body, and seeking recommendations for future care and treatment. Plaintiff also continues to suffer from mental stress, anxiety, worry, humiliation, fear, concern and other personal financial hardship due to the continuous fear of BIA-ALCL and aftermath from the suffering of BIA-ALCL.”

The case joins more than 75 breast implant lawsuits filed throughout the federal court system over the Allergan Biocell design, which have been consolidated before U.S. District Judge Brian R. Martinotti in the District of New Jersey for coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings.

Given common questions of fact and law raised throughout the litigation, it is expected that Judge Martinotti will select a small group of representative claims for early trial dates to help the parties gauge how juries may respond to certain evidence and testimony that is likely to be repeated throughout the litigation. However, as more women discover that they have BIA-ALCL or decide to have the breast implants removed, the size and scope of the litigation is expected to continue to expand over the coming months.


Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

BioZorb Lawsuit Alleges Breast Tissue Marker Failed, Requiring Surgical Removal
BioZorb Lawsuit Alleges Breast Tissue Marker Failed, Requiring Surgical Removal (Posted 2 days ago)

A BioZorb lawsuit has been filed by several breast cancer survivors after the BioZorb implants moved out of place and failed to dissolve int he body, requiring surgical removal.

Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October
Fairness Hearing For Philips CPAP Recall Medical Monitoring Settlement Set for October (Posted 2 days ago)

A U.S. District Court judge has scheduled a fairness hearing for October in order to determine whether final approval should be granted to a $25 million Philips CPAP recall settlement agreement, which would pay former users $25 million to pay for future medical monitoring needs.