Biomet Settlement for Magnum Hip Replacements Approaching

Hip replacement patients who have experienced problems with a Biomet Magnum metal-on-metal hip have two weeks to file their claim, if they wish to participate in a $56 million settlement agreement reached with the manufacturer.

Earlier this year, a Biomet settlement was reached to resolve product liability lawsuits brought by individuals who have required revision surgery due to complications associated with a Magnum hip replacement. However, the April 15 filing deadline is fast approaching.

There are currently about 1,000 Biomet M2A Magnum hip lawsuits, which all involve similar allegations that the implants were defectively designed and unreasonably dangerous, carrying a high risk of early failure within a few years after implant. In many of the cases, plaintiffs claim that they required revision surgery to have them taken out of their body due to catastrophic failures and other problems.

"*" indicates required fields

"*" indicates required fields

Under terms of the settlement agreement, each claimant will receive a base amount of $200,000, with other factors impacting the individual allocation in each case.

It is expected that most plaintiffs will agree to participate in the settlement, which should resolve the majority of the litigation. However, there are more than 250 cases pending that do not involve revision surgery, and a joint agreement reached by the parties may result in a stay on all proceedings in those cases until the plaintiffs require revision of the implant.

The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) established consolidated proceedings in the federal court system for all Biomet hip cases in October 2012, centralizing all pretrial proceedings before U.S. District Judge Robert L. Miller, Jr. in the Northern District of Indiana. The settlement agreement was reached before a series ofย โ€œbellwetherโ€ trials that were expected to begin next year.

The Biomet M2a Magnum is a metal-on-metal artificial hip replacement system. According to allegations raised in the complaints, the design causes excessive amounts of cobalt and chromium to corrode and wear from the surfaces of the acetabular cup, femoral head and taper sleeve as the metal parts rub against each other. This excessive wear makes the Biomet M2a Hip system prone to fail, leading to problems walking, pain, and frequently resulted in plaintiffs having to undergo revision surgery to have the device removed or replaced.

The company reportedly received hundreds of reports of failures not long after the implant was launched, and plaintiffs claim that should have resulted in a Biomet Magnum recall.

As early as August 2004, Biomet received a complaint involving a patient who required additional surgery to remove and replace a Biomet M2a Magnum Hip that had become loose only three years after it was implanted. However, according to allegations raised in plaintiffsโ€™ complaints, Biomet closed its investigation into the matter.

The Biomet hip lawsuits are similar to product liability litigation filed involving other metal-on-metal hip replacements, such as theย DePuy ASR,ย DePuy Pinnacleย andย Wright Conserve hip.

In November 2013, Johnson & Johnson agreed to pay at leastย $2.5 billion in Depuy ASR settlementsย to resolve about 8,000 cases brought against their DePuy Orthopaedics subsidiary.

Irvin Jackson
Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Lawsuit alleges Olympus failed to address known problems with sterilizing duodenoscopes, leading to a fatal ERCP infection years after federal regulators first raised concerns about the devices.
Federal regulators have centralized at least 23 Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in a multidistrict litigation that excludes multiple similar claims involving Abbott and Nevro implants.