Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Birth Brain Injury Risk Lower with Forceps than Vacuum Extraction: Study December 2, 2011 Staff Writers Add Your CommentsA new study is challenging the conventional wisdom that vacuum extraction and cesarean delivery are safer means of avoiding a birth brain injury than the use of forceps. According to a report published in the latest issue of the journal Obstetrics & Gynecology, researchers at Johns Hopkins School of Medicine have found that using forceps to deliver newborns greatly reduced the risk of a brain injury when compared to vacuum extraction.Vacuum extraction involves the use of suction on the child’s head to speed up delivery and help remove the infant from the birth canal. The process is primarily used when the baby is in distress.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know About…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONVaginal delivery using a vacuum extractor has slowly replaced the use of forceps in many situations, as they are generally considered safer and reduce the risk of facial nerve damage from forceps. However, severe and potentially life threatening birth injury can still occur with the use of vacuum extraction, most commonly involving bleeding in the area between the skull and the scalp or bleeding inside the child’s skull. This can result in brain damage, developmental problems or cerebral palsy.This new study raises questions about whether the medical community is moving away from the use of forceps too quickly.Researchers looked at data on live births of children at 34 weeks or greater gestation from 1995 to 2003 in New York City. They found that vaginal deliveries using forceps resulted in fewer seizures and fewer 5-minute Apgar scores of less than 7 when compared to vacuum extraction deliveries or cesarean deliveries.While cesarean deliveries resulted in fewer instances of some forms of subdural hemorrhaging, overall the researchers found that forceps were associated with the least risk of neurological damage. This is because the incidence of seizures, which are more likely to lead to long-term complications, are more clinically relevant than the subdural hemorrhaging, researchers explained.The researchers cautioned that with the rise of vacuum extraction and cesarean delivery, there are fewer residents and obstetricians who are experienced enough to perform forceps-assisted vaginal deliveries. Tags: Birth Injury, ChildrenMore Lawsuit Stories Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims June 16, 2026 Wegovy Vision Side Effects Resulted in Blindness in Left Eye, Lawsuit Alleges June 16, 2026 EnfaCare Preterm Infant NEC Lawsuit Alleges Formula Caused Life-Threatening Diagnosis June 16, 2026 0 Comments EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: today)Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (06/12/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026) Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (Posted: yesterday)A tentative Depo-Provera lawsuit settlement has been announced, vacating the start of the first bellwether trial while details are finalized.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026)Depo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (05/22/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026) Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (Posted: 5 days ago)A Suboxone dental erosion lawsuit filed by nine plaintiffs accuses the manufacturer of knowing the film strips caused severe tooth decay and other oral health problems, but failed to warn the medical community or patients.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)Study Finds No Birth Defect Risks From Suboxone When Compared to Methadone (04/30/2026)
Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Battery Problems Led to Repeat Surgeries, Lawsuit Claims (Posted: today)Four plaintiffs allege Abbott spinal cord stimulator battery problems, painful malfunctions and other device failures caused worsening symptoms and repeat surgeries after the company made hundreds of changes to its implant systems.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITLawsuit Alleges Spinal Cord Stimulator Shocks, Burns Caused by Manufacturing Defect (06/12/2026)Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuits Centralized in Federal MDL (06/08/2026)Lawsuit Indicates Spinal Cord Stimulator Lead Complications Resulted in Shocks, Removal Surgery (06/02/2026)
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Settlement Agreement May Resolve Eligible Meningioma Claims in MDL (Posted: yesterday)A tentative Depo-Provera lawsuit settlement has been announced, vacating the start of the first bellwether trial while details are finalized.MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITDepo-Provera Meningioma Side Effects Left Woman With Debilitating Migraines, Lawsuit Claims (06/05/2026)Depo-Provera Caused Meningioma 29 Years After First Birth Control Shots: Lawsuit (05/22/2026)Depo-Provera Lawsuit Filings Exceed 6,000, As Court Prepares for First Test Trials (05/18/2026)
Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (Posted: 5 days ago)A Suboxone dental erosion lawsuit filed by nine plaintiffs accuses the manufacturer of knowing the film strips caused severe tooth decay and other oral health problems, but failed to warn the medical community or patients.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Suboxone Dental Damage Warnings Were Issued Too Late (05/07/2026)Study Finds No Birth Defect Risks From Suboxone When Compared to Methadone (04/30/2026)