Brain Surgery Malpractice Lawsuit Filed Over Death of 16-Year Old Girl

The parents of a 16-year old girl who died after brain surgery have filed a wrongful death lawsuit alleging that a neurosurgeon tried to cover up his medical malpractice by interfering with the autopsy. The surgical mistake was only discovered by the family through depositions taken in another case filed over the improper harvesting of their daughters eyes after her death.

The brain surgery malpractice lawsuit was filed earlier this month by the parents of Jessica Siegel in the Court of Common Pleas in Hamilton, Ohio, against Dr. Andrew Joel Ringer and the Mayfield Clinic & Spine Institute in Cincinnati, according to The Cincinnati Enquirer.

The complaint alleges that Ringer botched a surgery meant to prevent veins in Siegel’s brain from knotting; a condition that significantly increased the chances for a stroke. Following the August 14, 2006 brain surgery, Siegel died 9 days later.

Did You Know?

Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled

Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.

Learn More

After Siegel’s death, her family requested a complete autopsy. However, Ringer subsequently ordered an autopsy that excluded examination of the head, which the family alleges was fraudulently ordered in an attempt to avoid medical malpractice liability.

Ringer told the Siegel family that the autopsy did not reveal the cause of Jessica Siegel’s death, and allegedly feigned surprise that there had not been an autopsy of the head, according to the lawsuit.

During deposition testimony in the organ donation lawsuit, a nurse testified that Ringer had agreed with Siegel’s father to perform a complete autopsy, but after the father left the room, Ringer ordered the nurse to scratch out the order and indicate that the autopsy should omit an examination of the head.

0 Comments

"*" indicates required fields

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Bard Argues Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Previously Selected for Bellwether Trials Are No Longer
Bard Argues Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Previously Selected for Bellwether Trials Are No Longer "Representative" (Posted 3 days ago)

Bard claims two cases selected for the third and fourth bellwether trials are no longer representative of the litigation due to the plaintiffs' worsening injuries and need for additional surgeries due to their failed hernia mesh products.