Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Buckyball Magnetic Toy Ban Ordered By CPSC July 26, 2012 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsFederal regulators are seeking a complete halt to the sale of Buckyballs, a powerful magnetic desk toy for adults, due to numerous reports involving children swallowing the magnets, which could result in serious and potentially life-threatening inuries.ย According to an administrative complaint filed this week, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) has received reports of toddlers finding loose Buckyball and Buckycube magnets left within reach and swallowing them.ย When the high powered magnets are swallowed they could cause serious internal injuries, especially if the magnets attract within the body, potentially resulting in organ perforation or death. As a result of the risk of problems with the Buckeyball magnetic toys, the CPSC is seeking a ban on the production.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThere are up to 216 powerful rare earth magnets in Buckyballs and Buckycubes. There have been two dozen magnet ingestion incidents since 2009, the CPSC reports, with at least a dozen linked to Buckyballs, many of which resulted in injuries for children who required surgery.This is only the CPSC’s second administrative complaint in 11 years, and was filed after Maxfield & Oberton Holdings LLC, of New York, N.Y., failed to issue a voluntary Buckyball Magnetic Toy recall in a way the CPSC considered adequate.The company and the CPSC were able to cooperate on a Buckyball recall in May 2010, which came because the toys were labeled “Ages 13+” and failed to meet federal toy standards for powerful loose magnets, which cannot be sold to children under the age of 14.In November 2011, the company and the CPSC worked together again on an educational campaign to tell consumers that the magnets were only meant for adult use. However, the CPSC indicates that the previous efforts have not been enough.According to a Reuters report, the founder of Maxfield and Oberton criticized the CPSC position and attempted to politicize the magnet recall in an emailed statement, describing the commission as hand-picked by President Barack Obama.Powerful toy magnets and their risks to children have been causing increasing concerns in recent years, resulting in several recalls and some lawsuits against manufacturers.In a report published by the American Academy of Pediatrics in June 2012, the risk of serious injuries from magnet toys was highlighted, explaining that the magnets may attract to one another across the intestinal wall, causing severe internal damage, such as obstructions and perforations. It is often necessary to remove the magnets surgically, which can result in further damage to the child’s stomach or intestines.Earlier this month, U.S. Toymaker Battat Incorporated, maker of the Magnabild Magnetic Building Sets, was fined $400,000 for allegedly failing to report problems with their magnetic toys, which were blamed for the death of at least one child.In May two personal injury lawsuits were filed against MEGA Brands of America after children suffered severe intestinal injuries from swallowing magnets from the Magnetix brand toy line. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Children, Childrens Toy, Magnetix, Personal Injury Image Credit: |More Lawsuit Stories Suboxone Manufacturer Faces Nearly 18,000 Dental Erosion Lawsuits July 9, 2026 Medtronic CapSureFix Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Device Failed and Could Not Be Safely Removed July 9, 2026 College Student Sports Betting May Cause Mental Health Problems: Study July 9, 2026 0 Comments CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Suboxone Manufacturer Faces Nearly 18,000 Dental Erosion Lawsuits (Posted: today)Indivior faces nearly 18,000 Suboxone dental erosion lawsuits filed by individuals nationwide who say the opioid addiction treatment caused severe tooth damage.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot (06/18/2026)Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (06/11/2026)Suboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026) Nevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion (Posted: yesterday)Plaintiffs have requested that the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidate all Nevro spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in the Central District of California for pretrial procedures.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITProclaim Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Follows Infection, Battery Migration Problems (07/06/2026)MDL Sought for Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits (06/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Caused Burning, Shocking Sensations (06/24/2026) Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (Posted: 2 days ago)An AngioDynamics Vortex port lawsuit alleges the implantable port catheter caused a South Carolina woman to suffer pulmonary embolisms and a serious infection requiring surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITAngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Claims Womanโs SmartPort Implants Caused Multiple Infections (06/23/2026)Xcela Port Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Caused Thrombosis (06/12/2026)Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Injury (06/03/2026)
Medtronic CapSureFix Pacemaker Lawsuit Claims Device Failed and Could Not Be Safely Removed July 9, 2026
Suboxone Manufacturer Faces Nearly 18,000 Dental Erosion Lawsuits (Posted: today)Indivior faces nearly 18,000 Suboxone dental erosion lawsuits filed by individuals nationwide who say the opioid addiction treatment caused severe tooth damage.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot (06/18/2026)Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (06/11/2026)Suboxone Oral Film Lawsuit Claims Opioid Treatment Causes Tooth Decay (05/20/2026)
Nevro SCS Lawsuits Warrant Centralization in New MDL: Motion (Posted: yesterday)Plaintiffs have requested that the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidate all Nevro spinal cord stimulator lawsuits in the Central District of California for pretrial procedures.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITProclaim Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Follows Infection, Battery Migration Problems (07/06/2026)MDL Sought for Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuits (06/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges WaveWriter Alpha Spinal Cord Stimulator Problems Caused Burning, Shocking Sensations (06/24/2026)
Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (Posted: 2 days ago)An AngioDynamics Vortex port lawsuit alleges the implantable port catheter caused a South Carolina woman to suffer pulmonary embolisms and a serious infection requiring surgical removal.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITAngioDynamics Port Catheter Lawsuit Claims Womanโs SmartPort Implants Caused Multiple Infections (06/23/2026)Xcela Port Lawsuit Claims AngioDynamics Catheter Caused Thrombosis (06/12/2026)Port Catheter Thrombosis Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Xcela Device Caused Injury (06/03/2026)