Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Sports Betting Addiction Lawsuit Sports betting addiction lawsuits are being investigated for college students and young adults who developed gambling problems after using apps like FanDuel and DraftKings, alleging that the platforms failed to warn about the addictive nature of their features and marketing practices.
Tabletop Fire Pit Lawsuit Individuals who suffered severe burns, or families who lost a loved one in a tabletop fire pit explosion, may be eligible for financial compensation through a fire pit injury lawsuit.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Dupixent Lawsuit Dupixent lawsuits are being investigated for patients who developed rare blood cancers such as cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) after receiving injections, alleging that Sanofi and Regeneron failed to warn about the potential risks of immune suppression and delayed cancer diagnosis.
Ocaliva Lawsuit Ocaliva lawsuits are being investigated for users who experienced liver failure, cirrhosis progression, transplant, or death after taking the drug, alleging that Intercept Pharmaceuticals failed to warn about the risk of dosing toxicity and accelerated liver damage.
Roblox Lawsuit Families are filing Roblox lawsuits after children were targeted by predators for grooming, sextortion, sexual abuse, or exploitation on the platform. Learn who qualifies, what cases allege, and how to file a confidential claim.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Denied Camp Lejeune Injury Claims Must Be Resubmitted Under New Act, U.S. Government Argues The government argues that denied Camp Lejeune injury claims were never assessed under the requirements of the new law November 14, 2022 Irvin Jackson Add Your Comments Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022 allows veterans and family members to file claims over damages caused by toxic water at the Marine base between 1950s and 1980s Law requires notice of potential claims be provided to U.S. government before a lawsuit is filed Days after Act went into effect, lawsuits were filed by plaintiffs with previously denied Camp Lejeune injury claims U.S. government now argues those individuals must restart their administrative review process LEARN MORE ABOUT CAMP LEJEUNE WATER CONTAMINATION LAWSUITS The U.S. government indicates that all previously denied Camp Lejeune injury claims still need to be resubmitted under the requirements of the recently passed Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022, urging a federal judge to reject arguments raised by a number of plaintiffs, who claim they should not be required to exhausted administrative remedies again. Camp Lejeune is a Marine Corps base in North Carolina, which was plagued with water contamination problems between the 1950s and 1980s, which exposed millions of service members, family members and other individuals to toxic chemicals in the drinking water. Although various cancers and other devastating injuries have been directly linked to contaminants in the water, by the time the extent of the problems were discovered, the ten-year North Carolina statute of limitations allowed the U.S. government to deny all claims, and hundreds of prior lawsuits were dismissed. On August 10, President Biden signed landmark new legislation, which corrected the federal governments failure to compensate veterans and military family members, opening a two year window for Camp Lejeune water contamination lawsuits to be filed to be filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, which has been granted exclusive jurisdiction over the claims. Stay Up-to-Date About Camp Lejeune Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Camp Lejeune lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Stay Up-to-Date About Camp Lejeune Lawsuits AboutLawsuits.com sends a weekly digest email with information about recalls, lawsuits and warnings that may impact your family, which will include any new Camp Lejeune lawsuit updates or developments. "*" indicates required fields Email* SIGN ME UP Δ Learn More Prior to filing a lawsuit under the Camp Lejeune Justice Act, the new law requires each claimant provide notice of their claim to the U.S. Navy, which must deny the claim in writing or fail to resolve the claim within six months. However, individuals who previously submitted Camp Lejeune claims that were denied by the U.S. Government immediately reinitiated their lawsuits, arguing that the notice requirements of the Act were satisfied when they originally presented their claims years ago. Previously Denied Camp Lejeune Claims were Properly Filed, Plaintiffs Argue Within days after President Biden signed the Honoring Our PACT Act in August 2022, dozens of individuals filed lawsuits under the new law, seeking damages for injuries caused by contaminated water at Camp Lejeune between 1953 and 1987, which had previously been denied by the U.S. government. However, those plaintiffs indicated that they were pursuing claims under the new Act based upon administrative notice provided prior to the new law going into effect. In September, U.S. District Judge James C. Dever III raised questions about whether these early plaintiffs complied with the Camp Lejeune Justice Act requirements, calling for evidence to be presented to establish how each claim was submitted and the date the U.S. government denied the claim under the Act, together with a brief explaining how an administrative claim brought before the Act was passed complies with the new requirements. In response, plaintiffs filed a memorandum on October 21, indicating that the Camp Lejeune Justice Act requires nothing more than the filing of a claim with the U.S. Navy setting forth the facts that led to a plaintiff’s injury and a demand for a sum of money, which each plaintiff did years ago. Therefore, they indicate there is nothing in the new law that requires they must go through the same administrative process again. U.S. Government Argues Plaintiffs With Denied Claims Must Restart Process The U.S. government filed a response (PDF) to plaintiffs’ memorandum on November 10, arguing that the new Camp Lejeune Justice Act requires each plaintiff to provide new notice of their claim under the law, and once again exhaust the administrative requirements. “Plaintiffs admit that they have not exhausted their claims after the [Camp Lejeune Justice Act] CLJA’s enactment,” according to the response. “Instead, Plaintiffs assert that the prior submission of a claim years before enactment of the CLJA is sufficient to satisfy the CLJA’s administrative exhaustion requirement, even though the Navy never had the opportunity to evaluate the claim under the standards of the CLJA.” According to the brief, the government never got to evaluate or assess the claims under the standards provided by the Camp Lejeune Justice Act, and indicate that the prior injury claims were denied on grounds that have since been nullified by the new law. However, Plaintiffs say the Act never created the need for a new claim to be exhausted, but instead is meant to “vindicate” a preexisting claim already filed with the courts. The plaintiffs’ memorandum included documents showing previous claims and denials on behalf of each of the plaintiffs who filed early lawsuits. Plaintiffs have until November 17, this Thursday, to file a final reply before Judge Dever determines whether the claims should be denied without prejudice, requiring each plaintiff to reinitiate the notice of their claims and wait yet another six months before filing a lawsuit. Camp Lejeune Justice Act Filing Requirements In addition to allowing previously denied claims to move forward, the Camp Lejeune Justice Act also allows any individual, or surviving family members, to pursue settlement benefits for injuries caused by contaminated water on the base, even if they never previously attempted to pursue a claim. For new cases, the Act requires that notice of the Camp Lejeune water contamination claim must be provided to the U.S. Navy under the requirements of 28 U.S. Code § 2675. The U.S. Navy JAG Corps has posted information about how to file a claim under the Camp Lejeune Justice Act of 2022, outlining the required steps needed to file a Camp Lejeune water lawsuit. Each claimant must include a Camp Lejeune Justice Act Claim form (PDF), providing specific information about their lawsuit, including: Status at time of exposure to Camp Lejeune water (Member of the Armed Forces; Military Family Member or Dependent; Civil Service Employee; Civilian; Contractor Working for Private Company on Base; Unborn Individual Exposed In Utero) Where you resided at the time of exposure (Terawa Terrace Housing; Hospital Point Housing; Other On-Base Housing; Outside of Camp Lejeune) Whether you worked at Hadnot Point Industrial Area in Camp Lejeune Nature of your injury (Personal Injury Caused by Water at Camp Lejeune; Wrongful Death Following Exposure to Camp Lejeune Water) Specific type of cancer or other injury that is the basis of the Camp Lejeune lawsuit The form also requires that each individual specify the amount of their Camp Lejeune claim in U.S. dollars, certifying that it will be accepted as a full and final Camp Lejeune water settlement amount if offered by the U.S. Government. Failure to specify the total amount of damages sought from the Camp Lejeune water contamination during this process may result in a forfeiture of their rights. Written by: Irvin Jackson Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Camp Lejeune, Military, North Carolina, Veterans, Veterans Affairs, Water Contamination More Camp Lejeune Lawsuit Stories Trichloroethylene Exposure Linked to Parkinson’s Disease Risk: Study October 8, 2025 Court Urged To Press Forward With Camp Lejeune Lawsuit Deadlines During Government Shutdown October 6, 2025 U.S. Government Seeks Dismissal of Camp Lejeune Kidney Cancer Lawsuits September 15, 2025 0 Comments X/TwitterThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes No Post Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this page Weekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings. Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA Term Δ MORE TOP STORIES Depo-Provera Side Effects Hidden for Decades, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: today) A woman’s Depo-Provera lawsuit says the manufacturers’ failure to warn doctors and patients of the risk of intracranial meningioma led to her developing two brain tumors. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITOver 1,300 Depo Shot Lawsuits Now Being Pursued by Women With Meningioma Tumors (10/06/2025)Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit Describes Left-Sided Numbness, Tingling Before Diagnosis (10/01/2025)Judge To Hear Depo-Provera Lawsuit Preemption Arguments on Monday (09/26/2025) Dupixent Lawyers To Meet With Court for Initial Conference in T-Cell Lymphoma Lawsuit (Posted: 3 days ago) Parties involved in a Dupixent T-cell lymphoma wrongful death lawsuit will participate in an initial status conference in early December, to map out how the litigation will move forward. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Cancer Risks Outlined in User Stories, as Evidence Mounts of T-Cell Lymphoma Link (10/08/2025)Dupixent Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed Over T-Cell Lymphoma Diagnosis (10/02/2025)Dupixent Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Warning Label Update Being Evaluated by FDA (09/15/2025) MDL Sought for Lyft Lawsuits Over Sexual Assaults by Drivers (Posted: 4 days ago) A group of plaintiffs are asking a panel of federal judges to consolidate all Lyft lawsuits involving driver sexual assaults against passengers before one judge as part of a Lyft MDL. MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITJury Finds Uber Failed To Protect Passengers, But Is Not Liable for Sexual Assault (10/01/2025)Lyft Sexual Assault Lawsuit Alleges Problems With Predatory Drivers Were Known for Years (09/25/2025)Two Uber Sexual Assault Bellwether Trials To Be Held in North Carolina (09/22/2025)
Court Urged To Press Forward With Camp Lejeune Lawsuit Deadlines During Government Shutdown October 6, 2025
Depo-Provera Side Effects Hidden for Decades, Lawsuit Alleges (Posted: today) A woman’s Depo-Provera lawsuit says the manufacturers’ failure to warn doctors and patients of the risk of intracranial meningioma led to her developing two brain tumors. MORE ABOUT: DEPO-PROVERA LAWSUITOver 1,300 Depo Shot Lawsuits Now Being Pursued by Women With Meningioma Tumors (10/06/2025)Depo-Provera Brain Tumor Lawsuit Describes Left-Sided Numbness, Tingling Before Diagnosis (10/01/2025)Judge To Hear Depo-Provera Lawsuit Preemption Arguments on Monday (09/26/2025)
Dupixent Lawyers To Meet With Court for Initial Conference in T-Cell Lymphoma Lawsuit (Posted: 3 days ago) Parties involved in a Dupixent T-cell lymphoma wrongful death lawsuit will participate in an initial status conference in early December, to map out how the litigation will move forward. MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Cancer Risks Outlined in User Stories, as Evidence Mounts of T-Cell Lymphoma Link (10/08/2025)Dupixent Wrongful Death Lawsuit Filed Over T-Cell Lymphoma Diagnosis (10/02/2025)Dupixent Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma Warning Label Update Being Evaluated by FDA (09/15/2025)
MDL Sought for Lyft Lawsuits Over Sexual Assaults by Drivers (Posted: 4 days ago) A group of plaintiffs are asking a panel of federal judges to consolidate all Lyft lawsuits involving driver sexual assaults against passengers before one judge as part of a Lyft MDL. MORE ABOUT: UBER SEXUAL ASSAULT LAWSUITJury Finds Uber Failed To Protect Passengers, But Is Not Liable for Sexual Assault (10/01/2025)Lyft Sexual Assault Lawsuit Alleges Problems With Predatory Drivers Were Known for Years (09/25/2025)Two Uber Sexual Assault Bellwether Trials To Be Held in North Carolina (09/22/2025)