Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinson’s Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinson’s disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Damage Cap for Georgia Malpractice Lawsuits Struck Down March 24, 2010 Staff Writers Add Your CommentsThe Georgia Supreme Court has unanimously ruled that limits placed on medical malpractice lawsuit awards in Georgia violate the state constitution’s right to trial by jury. The decision strikes down a 2005 law that was included in a tort reform package limiting the amount of non-economic damages that a plaintiff could be awarded in a Georgia malpractice lawsuit. The court declared that the $350,000 cap was unconstitutional.The lawsuit that led to the cap’s demise was brought by Betty Nestlehutt, who sued Atlanta Oculoplastic Surgery for plastic surgery malpractice, claiming that they disfigured her by destroying the blood supply to her face. A Fulton County jury awarded her $115,000 for medical expenses, and $900,000 for pain and suffering. Her husband also received $250,000 for loss of consortium.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know About…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONFollowing the jury’s decision, the medical malpractice damage cap in Georgia overrode the non-economic damages portion of the verdict, reducing everything but the medical expenses to $350,000. Nestlehutt appealed, saying that her right to trial by jury under the Georgia constitution had been violated. The high court agreed, saying that malpractice caps interfered with the right to a jury trial by stepping on the jury’s jurisdiction.The 7-0 decision, agreed to by judges from both sides of the political spectrum, mirrors a decision in February by the Illinois Supreme Court, which struck down caps on Illinois malpractice lawsuits under similar grounds. The decision also follows a split decision last month by the same court that upheld tort reform provisions requiring plaintiffs to prove “gross negligence” in emergency room malpractice cases.California was the first state to enact a damage cap in 1975, specifically limiting the non-economic damages in medical malpractice lawsuits. According to the National Conference of State Legislatures, as of 2005 ten states capped recoveries specifically on medical malpractice cases and another 22 have caps that are not limited to medical malpractice. About a dozen states also have caps on punitive damages.Similar caps are facing legal challenges in Missouri and Indiana. Tags: Emergency Room Malpractice, Georgia, Medical Malpractice, Plastic Surgery, Supreme Court, Surgery MalpracticeMore Lawsuit Stories Dupixent Lawyers Seek Leadership Positions in MDL Over Cancer Risks October 1, 2026 Amazon Coowalk Heated Insoles Lawsuit Alleges Lithium-Ion Battery Explosion Caused Severe Burns October 1, 2026 Chlorpyrifos Ban Takes Effect Across EU as Studies Link Pesticide Exposure to Parkinson’s Disease October 1, 2026 0 Comments CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Dupixent Lawyers Seek Leadership Positions in MDL Over Cancer Risks (Posted: today)Plaintiffs propose that about a dozen attorneys be appointed to leadership positions in the growing Dupixent cancer litigation.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Side Effects Lawsuit Alleges Drug Caused Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (09/24/2026)Dupixent Side Effects Caused CTCL, Tumors, Lawsuit Alleges (09/10/2026)Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (08/20/2026) Lawyers Preparing 35 Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits in Core Discovery Pool (Posted: yesterday)Nearly three dozen Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits are being prepared for early test trials, involving the deposition of plaintiffs who say they suffered tooth loss as a result of using the opioid addiction treatment.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Manufacturer Faces Nearly 18,000 Dental Erosion Lawsuits (07/09/2026)Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot (06/18/2026)Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (06/11/2026) Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery (Posted: 3 days ago)A Texas woman’s Boston Scientific SCS implant lawsuit claims she spent several years with a broken device in her back, but did not remove it because the company’s sales representatives said it just needed reprogramming.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro SCS Implant Lawsuit Alleges Sales Rep Programming Led to Permanent Nerve Damage (09/21/2026)Boston Scientific Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Numbness, Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction (09/16/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit (09/10/2026)
Amazon Coowalk Heated Insoles Lawsuit Alleges Lithium-Ion Battery Explosion Caused Severe Burns October 1, 2026
Chlorpyrifos Ban Takes Effect Across EU as Studies Link Pesticide Exposure to Parkinson’s Disease October 1, 2026
Dupixent Lawyers Seek Leadership Positions in MDL Over Cancer Risks (Posted: today)Plaintiffs propose that about a dozen attorneys be appointed to leadership positions in the growing Dupixent cancer litigation.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent Side Effects Lawsuit Alleges Drug Caused Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma (09/24/2026)Dupixent Side Effects Caused CTCL, Tumors, Lawsuit Alleges (09/10/2026)Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (08/20/2026)
Lawyers Preparing 35 Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuits in Core Discovery Pool (Posted: yesterday)Nearly three dozen Suboxone tooth decay lawsuits are being prepared for early test trials, involving the deposition of plaintiffs who say they suffered tooth loss as a result of using the opioid addiction treatment.MORE ABOUT: SUBOXONE TOOTH DECAY LAWSUITSuboxone Manufacturer Faces Nearly 18,000 Dental Erosion Lawsuits (07/09/2026)Suboxone Dry Mouth Lawsuit Claims Dental Problems Could Have Been Avoided With Sublocade Shot (06/18/2026)Suboxone Dental Erosion Lawsuit Alleges Indivior Should Have Known About Tooth Decay Risks (06/11/2026)
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Boston Scientific Device Failure Required Removal Surgery (Posted: 3 days ago)A Texas woman’s Boston Scientific SCS implant lawsuit claims she spent several years with a broken device in her back, but did not remove it because the company’s sales representatives said it just needed reprogramming.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro SCS Implant Lawsuit Alleges Sales Rep Programming Led to Permanent Nerve Damage (09/21/2026)Boston Scientific Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Filed Over Numbness, Incontinence, Erectile Dysfunction (09/16/2026)Abbott Spinal Cord Stimulator Explant Surgery Required After Device Failure: Lawsuit (09/10/2026)