Cardiac Sciences Defibrillator Recall: Units May Fail When Needed

About 12,200 automated external defibrillators (AEDs) manufactured by Cardiac Science Corporation are being recalled because they may fail to deliver life-saving shocks when needed.

The defibrillator recall was announced on February 3 by FDA after Cardiac Science determined that the AEDs were defectively manufactured. The recalled units may not function correctly during a resuscitation attempt, which could lead to serious injury or death, the company said. The recall is a Class 1 recall, the most serious medical device recall category.

There have been no failure incidents reported in connection to the defective AEDs. The defect was found by internal quality control at Cardiac Science Corporation.

Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit
Spinal-Cord-Stimulation-Lawsuit

The AED recall affects Cardiac Scienceโ€™s Powerheart 9300A, 9300E, 9390A and 9390E, as well as the CardioVive 92532, the CardioLife 9200G and 9231. The recall is a separate issue from a medical device correction alert issued by the company on November 13 dealing with some of its defibrillators.

The affected AEDs were manufactured between October 19, 2009 and January 15, 2010. Any customers who purchased an AEDs during that time can check Cardiac Scienceโ€™s website to determine whether their unit is affected by the recall. The company is also informing customers by letter.

Replacement defibrillators will be available after February 15 and will be replaced at no charge.

The company recommends that any recalled defibrillators be immediately taken out of service.


0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

An Illinois woman has joined a growing number of plaintiffs alleging that the Medtronic Intellis neurostimulator, and similar devices, may fail to relieve chronic pain and instead lead to worsening complications.
A federal judge is being asked to certify seven hair relaxer class action lawsuits seeking medical monitoring for users, following studies that link the products to an increased risk of cancer.