Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Cartiva Implant Recall Issued by Stryker Due to Rising Rates of Big Toe Joint FailureManufacturerโs decision to recall Cartiva big toe implants comes as a number of patients pursue lawsuits alleging the device was defectively designed and prone to failure. November 27, 2024 Russell Maas Add Your CommentsAlthough the Cartiva implant has been widely advertised as a superior alternative to big toe fusion surgery, with the manufacturers claiming patients face a low risk of complications, a massive recall has now been issued for all lots of the synthetic cartilage implant (SCI) sold since July 2016, due to a โhigher-than-expectedโ rate of failure, often resulting in the need for removal or revision surgery.The Cartiva SCI is a molded cylindrical implant made of polyvinyl alcohol-based hydrogel (PVA), which has been promoted as an alternative to fusion surgery for treating hallux limitus or hallux rigidus, which are forms of degenerative arthritis in the big toeโs first joint.Although the FDA approved the Cartiva implant in 2016 based on clinical trials showing a 13% failure rate, concerns have emerged in recent years about significantly higher Cartiva failure rates, with a number of individuals now pursuing product liability lawsuits against Stryker, alleging that they manufactured and sold an unreasonably defective and dangerous product.The Cartiva implant lawsuits outline reports of users experiencing severe complications, including severe toe pain, loosening, fractures and other issues. Often, these complications necessitate surgery to fuse the big toe, resulting in a loss of mobility.Cartiva LawsuitDid you or a loved one receive a Cartiva Toe Implant?Lawyers are reviewing Cartiva lawsuits for individuals who experienced complications after receiving the toe implant. Settlement benefits may be available.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONCartiva LawsuitDid you or a loved one receive a Cartiva Toe Implant?Lawyers are reviewing Cartiva lawsuits for individuals who experienced complications after receiving the toe implant. Settlement benefits may be available.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONLawsuits over the Cartiva implant have pointed to a growing body of medical research and case reports published in recent years, which challenged Strykerโs claimed 13% Cartiva failure rate, with some findings suggesting that 79% of Cartiva implants fail within two years.Earlier this month, a new study was released, which indicated that Cartiva implant patients faced a 30 times higher rate of reoperation than those who received alternative procedures, which was expected to provide important new evidence in the litigation.Cartiva Implant Recall Issued by StrykerIn response to the growing evidence, Stryker quietly issued a Cartiva implant recall (PDF) late last month, calling for the return of all existing devices, so that it can provide updated postmarket safety information for patients and medical providers.According to a medical device recall notice sent to surgeons and hospital risk managers on October 31, 2024, Stryker decided to recall Cartiva implants in response to this newly published data and postmarket reports revealing that patients with Cartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implants (SCI) are experiencing higher-than-expected rates of complications compared to the figures presented in the 2016 Premarket Approval (PMA).These complications include the need for revision or removal of the implant, subsidence, displacement, persistent pain, nerve damage and fragmentation. In several cases, Stryker indicates Cartiva SCI devices have required revision or removal at rates that surpass those observed in the initial premarket and post-approval studies.The recall includes all lots of Cartiva Synthetic Cartilage Implant (SCI) that were sold from July 2016 through October 2024, including 6 mm, 8 mm, 10 mm and 12 mm sizes, with the following catalog and primary device identifier (PDI) numbers:CAR-06-US (6mm) โ PDI 00852897002328CAR-08-US (8mm) โ PDI 00852897002021CAR-10-US (10mm) โ PDI 00852897002038CAR-12-US (12mm) โ PDI 00852897002335Medical facilities are being instructed to review their internal inventories to identify the recalled Cartiva products. Once identified, these devices must be removed from their points of use and either isolated or quarantined to prevent further use. All affected implants available at the facility should be returned to:Product Field Action Product Return ATTN: Return PFAA 3775099/PFAE 3794726 Memphis-Arlington Rd Arlington, TN 38002As part of the recall, healthcare providers and physicians are instructed to continue monitoring patients who have received the affected Cartiva implants for any new or worsening symptoms. These symptoms may include pain, difficulty walking, skin reactions, stiffness, swelling or weakness in the big toe joint.If users experience adverse reactions or encounter quality issues with the Cartiva implant, they are encouraged to report these incidents promptly to Strykerโs Trauma & Extremities division complaint department via email and the FDA MedWatch Serious Injury Reporting Program.Cartiva Implant Failure LawyersLawyers are continuing to investigate new Cartiva implant lawsuits for individuals who have suffered injuries or required additional surgery that could have been avoided if warnings about the rate of Cartiva failures had been disclosed in a timely manner.Financial compensation may be available through a Cartiva implant failure lawsuit settlement for individuals who received the big toe implant and experienced any of the following complications:Implant Failure/FractureSubsidence (implant sinks into the bone)Toe Fusion SurgeryReplacement SurgeryRevision SurgeryAll claims are being pursued by Cartiva implant lawyers on a contingency fee basis, which means that there are no fees or expenses paid unless a Cartiva settlement or lawsuit payout is received. Written by: Russell MaasManaging Editor & Senior Legal JournalistRussell Maas is a paralegal and the Managing Editor of AboutLawsuits.com, where he has reported on mass tort litigation, medical recalls, and consumer safety issues since 2010. He brings legal experience from one of the nationโs leading personal injury law firms and oversees the siteโs editorial strategy, including SEO and content development. Tags: Big Toe Fusion, Cartiva Failure Rates, Cartiva Implant Lawsuit, Cartiva Implant Recall, Stryker Image Credit: Shutterstock: Sundry Photography Find Out If You Qualify for Cartiva Failure CompensationMore Cartiva Lawsuit Stories Cartiva Implant Lawyers To Meet With MDL Judge for Initial Conference in Aug. 2026 June 30, 2026 Failed Cartiva Implant Required Multiple Toe Surgeries, Lawsuit Alleges June 11, 2026 Cartiva Surgery Lawsuit Claims SCI Implant Failure Required Big Toe Fusion May 26, 2026 0 Comments CommentsThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES AngioDynamics SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges Defective Port Caused Sepsis (Posted: 2 days ago)A Pennsylvania man has filed an AngioDynamics SmartPort lawsuit alleging catheter defects promoted bacterial growth, causing a severe infection and sepsis only weeks after implantation.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Sepsis Lawsuit Claims Defective SmartPort Implant Caused Infection (07/22/2026)SmartPort Catheter Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Port-a-Cath Caused Infection (07/14/2026)Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (07/07/2026) Lawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (Posted: 3 days ago)An Alabama woman has filed a lawsuit alleging a Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator failed to relieve her chronic pain, instead causing complications that ultimately required surgery to remove the entire system.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITSpine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (07/31/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)Abbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (07/23/2026) Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Payout of $88M Awarded in First MDL Bellwether Trial (Posted: 4 days ago)The first Covidien hernia mesh bellwether trial has ended in an $88 million verdict for the plaintiff, who suffered bowel resectioning and revision surgery after his Symbotex hernia mesh failed.MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITHernia Mesh Failure Lawsuit Alleges ProGrip Implant Was Prone to Breaking and Fragmenting (08/03/2026)Bard Composix Kugel Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Claims Defective Implant Required Bowel Resection (07/27/2026)First Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Trial Over Symbotex Problems To Begin Next Week (07/10/2026)
AngioDynamics SmartPort Infection Lawsuit Alleges Defective Port Caused Sepsis (Posted: 2 days ago)A Pennsylvania man has filed an AngioDynamics SmartPort lawsuit alleging catheter defects promoted bacterial growth, causing a severe infection and sepsis only weeks after implantation.MORE ABOUT: ANGIODYNAMICS PORT CATHETER LAWSUITPort Catheter Sepsis Lawsuit Claims Defective SmartPort Implant Caused Infection (07/22/2026)SmartPort Catheter Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Port-a-Cath Caused Infection (07/14/2026)Vortex Port Lawsuit Claims Defective AngioDynamics Device Caused Infection, Pulmonary Embolism (07/07/2026)
Lawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (Posted: 3 days ago)An Alabama woman has filed a lawsuit alleging a Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator failed to relieve her chronic pain, instead causing complications that ultimately required surgery to remove the entire system.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITSpine Stimulator Injury Lawyers Seek Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (07/31/2026)Spinal Cord Stimulator Reprogramming Caused Electric Shocks, Worsening Pain: Lawsuit (07/27/2026)Abbott Faces Spine Stimulator Lawsuit Brought Jointly by 17 Injured Patients (07/23/2026)
Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Payout of $88M Awarded in First MDL Bellwether Trial (Posted: 4 days ago)The first Covidien hernia mesh bellwether trial has ended in an $88 million verdict for the plaintiff, who suffered bowel resectioning and revision surgery after his Symbotex hernia mesh failed.MORE ABOUT: HERNIA MESH LAWSUITHernia Mesh Failure Lawsuit Alleges ProGrip Implant Was Prone to Breaking and Fragmenting (08/03/2026)Bard Composix Kugel Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Claims Defective Implant Required Bowel Resection (07/27/2026)First Covidien Hernia Mesh Lawsuit Trial Over Symbotex Problems To Begin Next Week (07/10/2026)