Lawsuits Over Chevy Bolt Batteries To Proceed Without Centralized Management in Federal Courts
A panel of federal judges has rejected a request to consolidate all Chevrolet Bolt EV battery lawsuits before one judge for pretrial proceedings, indicating that there are too few cases filed to date, and that the litigation can be coordinated more efficiently without the creation of a formal multidistrict litigation (MDL).
General Motors currently faces at least eight separate class action lawsuits over Chevy Bolt battery problems, which are pending in three different U.S. District courts.
Each of the complaints raise similar questions of fact and law, alleging the lithium ion batteries not only pose a fire and injury risk. Plaintiffs also allege that the Chevy Bolt battery repair remedy now limits the maximum state of charge, and reduces the number of miles the vehicles can travel.
Did You Know?
Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled
Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.Learn More
To avoid duplicative discovery into common issues in the claims and conflicting scheduling orders from different U.S. District Judges, a group of nine plaintiffs with cases pending in the Northern District of Illinois filed a motion to transfer with the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (JPML) in January, seeking to centralize the Chevy Bolt battery cases before one judge.
Following oral arguments held on March 25, the JPML issued an order denying transfer (PDF) on April 1, noting that five of the eight cases are already pending in the same district and that the parties have not demonstrated consideration of other methods of managing the litigation.
The litigation remains in its “nascent stages”, according to the panel, which indicates that “informal cooperation among the relatively few involved parties and courts is another practicable alternative to centralization.”
For now, the cases will continue forward individually in their respective U.S. District Courts. However, the Panel indicated that plaintiffs in any additional actions may be amenable to filing or transferring their cases to the Eastern District of Michigan, where most of the litigation is already pending.
According to the judges, they may consider the creation of a Chevrolet Bolt EV battery MDL if more cases are filed, and the courts refuse to allow the cases to be transferred.
Chevrolet Bolt Battery Problems
The litigation emerged after a Chevrolet Bolt EV battery recall was issued by General Motors in November 2020, due to defective cells used in the 60 kWh 350 V lithium-ion battery that were installed in approximately 50,932 model year 2017 through 2018 and certain 2019 Chevrolet Bolt EV vehicles.
GM has received a total of 12 reports of a Chevy Bolt battery overheating, emitting smoke or smoldering. Five of the reports resulted in actual fires starting in the engine compartment, and caused five smoke inhalation injuries.
To address the problems with the Chevy Bolt batteries, GM offered customers a partial remedy, which includes limiting the EV battery charge to 90%, and instructing customers to park their vehicles outside and away from structures to avoid injuries or property damage in the case of a battery fire.
As a result of GM’s failure to fully remedy the defect, customers have claimed they would have purchased a different electric vehicle, or paid significantly less, due to the lack of battery capacity which limits the vehicles travel ability.
RaulNovember 5, 2021 at 4:57 pm
I own a 2021 Chevy Bolt EV. I’ve asked GM to repurchase (buy-back) the car for fear it will catch fire, not to mention the restrictions imposed upon consumers as a temporary fix. Yesterday I got a call from someone identifying herself as my newly appointed “Bolt Concierge.” The lady explained that GM no longer accepts buy-back and based upon the information I provided she was recommending that my[Show More]I own a 2021 Chevy Bolt EV. I’ve asked GM to repurchase (buy-back) the car for fear it will catch fire, not to mention the restrictions imposed upon consumers as a temporary fix. Yesterday I got a call from someone identifying herself as my newly appointed “Bolt Concierge.” The lady explained that GM no longer accepts buy-back and based upon the information I provided she was recommending that my case be dropped by GM’s Bolt Repurchase Team. I absolutely disagreed with her recommendation to no avail. I will not drive a car that can catch fire even after GM says the car has been fixed. So far, I have nothing in writing from GM as a response. Everything is being handled through live chats, e-mails, and informal phone calls. Time for action. I need options. Any thoughts?
"*" indicates required fields
More Top Stories
Bard claims two cases selected for the third and fourth bellwether trials are no longer representative of the litigation due to the plaintiffs' worsening injuries and need for additional surgeries due to their failed hernia mesh products.
More than 775 Exactech lawsuits have been filed in federal and state courts as parties work toward a plan for bellwether early test trials.
A federal judge has announced he will soon begin remanding 3M earplug lawsuits back to their originating districts for trials over claims of veteran hearing loss.