Chrysler SUV Recall Issued Over Brake Booster Problem

Chrysler is recalling more than 850,000 sport utility vehicles (SUV) after receiving warranty claims that suggest the brake system may corrode over time, as water enters the brake booster, potentially leading to a loss of brakes and creating a crash hazard.  

The Chrysler SUV recall was announced on April 1, after the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) learned of at least one accident that appears to be caused by problems with a braking systems. No injuries were reported in relation to the accident.

Approximately 867,000 Jeep Grand Cherokee and Dodge Durango vehicles from the 2011 through 2014 model years are affected by the recall. It is estimated that about 644,000 of those vehicles were sold in the United States.

Did You Know?

Change Healthcare Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Change Healthcare data breach exposed the names, social security numbers, medical and personal information of potentially 100 million Americans, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

The recalled Chrysler vehicles are equipped with a brake booster system that is only partially coated to prevent corrosion on the mechanical parts. Chrysler’s investigation has determined that small amounts of water may enter the brake booster system through the crimp joints and freeze, diminishing the capability of the braking ability.

The brake booster erosion concern began last spring when Chrysler became aware of customer complaints indicating the brakes required more force to be applied to the brake pedal to stop the vehicles but by federal regulation standards the reports did not warrant a recall. After winter months and cold weather set it Chrysler began receiving more complaints of the same nature and began applying an anti-corrosion coating on the new parts.

Shortly after complaints were received from customers that indicated water was entering the booster systems and freezing, the NHTSA contacted Chrysler and conducted tests confirming a recall was necessary.

The company plans to initiate the recall repairs for free at Chrysler dealers in May 2014. The repairs will consist of installing a shield to keep water from entering the booster and through the crimp joints. The shield will give the booster a normal life expectancy, Chrysler officials say.

Owners of affected vehicles may contact Chrysler at 1-800-853-1403 for further details until the official recall notices are sent. Customers are also encouraged to contact the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Vehicle Safety hotline at 1-800-327-4236 or visit them online at www.safecar.gov to report any adverse events involving the recalled vehicles.

Photo courtesy of alv1nW/Flickr via Creative Commons

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Status Conference To Be Held With MDL Judge This Week
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Status Conference To Be Held With MDL Judge This Week (Posted today)

U.S. District Judge presiding over all federal hair relaxer lawsuits will meet with lawyers involved in the litigation on Thursday, to discuss the status of the claims and when to move forward with bellwether cases.

Lawyers Propose MDL Trial Dates for Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit Starting in May 2025
Lawyers Propose MDL Trial Dates for Baby Formula NEC Lawsuit Starting in May 2025 (Posted yesterday)

A series of four bellwether claims in the baby formula NEC lawsuit MDL will be ready to go before a federal juries in May 2025, August 2025, November 2025 and February 2026 according to a proposed trial schedule agreed upon by both plaintiffs and defendants.