Deadly Champlain Towers Collapse In Miami Leads To Class Action Lawsuit Against Condo Association

Following the tragic collapse of the Champlain Towers condominium building in Florida last week, a class action lawsuit has been filed against the condo association, alleging that building management neglected apparent structural concerns, leading to the collapse.

The complaint (PDF) was filed by Manuel Drezner in Miami-Dade County circuit court on June 24, seeking class action status to pursue damages on behalf of all victims and surviving family members of those who have been injured or killed in the collapse of Champlain Towers South. It names the Champlain Towers South Condominium Association, Inc. as the defendant.

On June 24, at approximately 1:30 a.m., the entire northeast corridor of Champlain Towers South condominium building in Surfside, Florida collapsed. At least nine deaths have been confirmed, with more than 150 residents remaining unaccounted for, as rescue teams continue to search through the rubble.

Did You Know?

Change Healthcare Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Change Healthcare data breach exposed the names, social security numbers, medical and personal information of potentially 100 million Americans, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

According to allegations raised in the lawsuit, the 12-story building collapsed due to Champlain Towers South Condominium Association’s failure to take reasonable steps to prevent the catastrophe, and its failure to monitor the building and activities that reportedly led to the collapse.

Drezner, who was a resident of the condominium, alleges the collapse could have been avoided through the exercise of ordinary care, safety measures and oversight.

The Champlain Towers class action lawsuit indicates the agreement between residents and the condo association specifically states “the association shall maintain, repair and replace at the association’s own expense…all portions of the units…contributing to the support of the building, which portions should include but not limited to, the outside of the building and load bearing columns.”

Drezner seeks in excess of $5 million in damages for plaintiffs similarly situated, and presents claims of breach of contract and breach of implied warranty of habitability.

In the later morning hours following the collapse, Surfside Mayor Charles Burkett confirmed with media outlets that the building was undergoing its mandatory 40-year recertification process, and that a concrete restoration project was also being planned at the time of the collapse.

The lawsuit is the first of several anticipated in the coming weeks, as rescuers continue to search through the collapsed building for those who are still missing. Given the nature of the collapse, which included a pancaking of numerous floors, it is expected the death toll will rise significantly.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

BioZorb Lawsuit Indicates Recalled Tissue Marker Migrated After It Failed To Absorb, Resulting in Severe Pain and Surgical Removal
BioZorb Lawsuit Indicates Recalled Tissue Marker Migrated After It Failed To Absorb, Resulting in Severe Pain and Surgical Removal (Posted yesterday)

Days after the FDA announced a BioZorb recall, an Arkansas woman has filed a lawsuit, indicating that her BioZorb tissue marker migrated out of position, causing pain and disfigurement, instead of harmlessly absorbing into the body as advertised.