EPA Decision Not To Enforce Some Environmental Laws During Pandemic Sparks Lawsuit

Several environmental organizations have filed a lawsuit against the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), claiming federal regulators are using the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic to illegally relax environmental laws and endanger public health.

More than a dozen organizations filed a complaint for declaratory and injunctive relief (PDF) in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York on April 16, including the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC), Clean Water Action, Public Citizen, Flint Rising and others. The lawsuit names the EPA, as well as Administrator Andrew Wheeler and Assistant Administrator Susan Parker Bodine as defendants.

On March 26, the EPA announced it would be using enforcement discretion as response to the coronavirus pandemic. The agency indicated that it anticipated some businesses would not be able to meet environmental reporting requirements as a result of stay-at-home orders and state shutdowns caused by the COVID-19 outbreak.

Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits
Sports-Betting-Addiction-Lawsuits

“The consequences of the pandemic may affect facility operations and the availability of key staff and contractors and the ability of laboratories to timely analyze samples and provide results. As a result, there may be constraints on the ability of a facility or laboratory to carry out certain activities required by our federal environmental permits, regulations, and statutes,” the EPA wrote in a memorandum (PDF) to all governmental and private sector partners. “These consequences may affect reporting obligations and milestones set forth in settlements and consent decrees.”

However, environmental groups say the EPA is simply using the pandemic to give industry groups a free pass to pollute. They also say the policy doesn’t allow the public to know when these companies are out of compliance and may be polluting their air and water.

The EPA requested companies inform the agency if they stop monitoring for pollution, but does not require they do so.

“Now more than ever, we need EPA to do its job and protect our health—not put it at greater risk,” Gina McCarthy, president and CEO of NRDC, said in a press release. “During a pandemic that is hitting people with heart and lung disease the hardest, it is senseless to push forward a ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ policy for polluters that will allow them to make our air and water dirtier without warning or repercussion. This policy benefits polluters and polluters alone—and all at our expense.”

On April 1, the NRDC and other groups sent a petition (PDF) to the EPA calling for an emergency rule which would require companies to report when they stop monitoring air and water emissions, which would then be disclosed to the public. However, the lawsuit claims that petition was ignored.

As a result, this latest filing calls for a federal judge to order the EPA to respond to the petition.

“EPA’s new non-enforcement policy presents a huge threat to downstream, downwind, and fenceline communities around the country. Environmental monitoring and reporting are essential for those communities,” the lawsuit states. “Without timely information about air and water emissions, people are unable to take steps to protect themselves from pollution or pursue appropriate enforcement against polluters.”

Written by: Irvin Jackson

Senior Legal Journalist & Contributing Editor

Irvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends.




0 Comments


This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Share Your Comments

This field is hidden when viewing the form
I authorize the above comments be posted on this page
Post Comment
Weekly Digest Opt-In

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

MORE TOP STORIES

Breast mesh products marketed as “internal bras” for lift and augmentation surgeries are now under investigation amid reports of painful complications, and questions over manufacturers’ prior knowledge of mesh-related risks.
A federal judge has set key scheduling deadlines for the four first bellwether trials over claims that BioZorb breast markers are defectively designed.
Parties in federal Depo-Provera meningioma lawsuits seek closer coordination with Delaware and New York state courts, proposing a synchronization of general causation schedules.