Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Toy Magnetic Ball Injury Risk Should Result in Ban from U.S.: Experts October 23, 2013 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsA recent panel of experts was convened to review the dangers of small toy magnetic balls, and many have called for a complete ban on the office desk toys due to the serious risks they pose for children. ย The U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) held a hearing on October 22 to review toy magnet set safety standards, as the organization considers a new rule that would ban some of them from the U.S.A number of medical experts testified at the hearing, but the founder of one of the most successful brands complained that the industry had not been notified of the event.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONThe public hearing came after years of the CPSC battling to get better label warnings on the toy magnet sets, and, when that appeared to fail at preventing injuries, fighting to have them removed from the market entirely.ย The CPSC was forced to file rare administrative complaints against a number of manufacturers in July 2012, seeking to force theย recall of BuckyBallsย andย Zen Magnets.The proposed rule (PDF) would prohibit toy magnet sets that have more than one magnet that fits within the CPSC’s small parts cylinder, used for determining whether a part is small enough to be swallowed by a child, and if the magnets from the set had a flux index (a measure of magnet strength) of 50 or more.Magnet toy sets have been linked with a number of serious and potentially life threatening injuries for children and young adults in recent years, occurring after one or more of the small balls are accidentally swallowed. This often has been reported among infants, toddlers and teens attempting to simulate tongue or cheek piercings.If more than one of the powerful magnets are swallowed, they often attract to each other while moving through the intestines. This may cause intestines to twist, create blockages or tear intestinal walls. Often this results in the need for emergency surgery and can result in death or severe life-long health problems for the child.Initial symptoms associated with swallowing the small magnets may be similar to that of a common flu consisting of vomiting, diarrhea, and stomach pain, causing the problems not to be promptly recognized until certain medical examinations are done, further delaying treatment and allowing the magnets to attract.Experts Testify in Support of Toy Magnet Ban“These products already include warnings to keep the product away from children, that serious injury or death may occur, and that the products are only intended for those 14 and older,” testified Ami Gadhia, senior policy counsel for the Consumers Union, known mostly for its Consumer Reports publications. “However, despite the existence of these warnings as of 2010, the reports of injuries from ingestion of these products continued.”The Consumers Union was joined in support of the rule by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP).“The AAP fully supports this proposed rule because it will address a well-documented threat to child health,” testified Mark A. Gilger, MD, on behalf of the AAP. “Warning labels area less effective injury prevention method than changing a product to reduce the hazard, and would be particularly ineffective in this instance because children six and younger represent the bulk of incidents associated with this product.”However, Tim Szeto, founder of Nano Magnetics, Ltd. sent an e-mail to the CPSC protesting the hearing. Szeto said the CPSC failed to properly notify interested stakeholders and that the information about the hearing was not widely disseminated on the agency’s website, twitterfeed or through direct communication with businesspeople who would be affected. He called for a proper announcement and an extension of the oral comment period to allow other interested parties to put their input in writing to the CPSC.“I’d like to state for the record that these parties had not been made aware of the opportunity for oral presentation of comment taking place on October 22nd, 2013, and thereby cannot be in attendance,” he wrote. “These parties however did wish to attend, and are indeed considered to be interested parties with substantive comments.”The notice of opportunity for oral presentation of comments posted on the CPSC website is dated September 24.An estimated 3 million of the magnet sets have been sold in the U.S. since 2010. Despite the regulatory efforts to place strong warning labels on the products and launch an educational campaign for consumers, reports of continuing injuries led the safety regulators to determine that the manufacture and sale of the powerful toy magnets should be banned.Consumers have been urged to immediately stop using any magnet ball sets and to make certain that they are kept out of reach of children. In addition, safety officials indicate that consumers should teach children of all ages about the risks posed by magnets or items containing magnets, urging them to never place any in their mouth or nose and to seek immediate medical attention for any child who is suspected of swallowing one or more magnets. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Buckyballs, Children, Childrens Toy, Magnets Image Credit: |More Lawsuit Stories Judge Appoints Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL August 24, 2026 Kratom Addiction Lawsuit Alleges Opioid-Like Products Caused Addiction, Cardiac Injury August 24, 2026 Clear Eyes Recall Issued Due to Risk Eye Drops May Be Contaminated August 24, 2026 0 Comments FacebookThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Judge Appoints Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (Posted: today)A federal judge has appointed a group of plaintiffs attorneys to leadership positions in the growing Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator federal litigation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Spine Implant Caused Nerve Damage, Shocks (08/18/2026)Nevro Stimulator Lawsuit MDL Request Opposed by Manufacturer (08/14/2026)Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (08/10/2026) Similac Settlement Provides $670M Payout To Resolve 2,000 NEC Lawsuits (Posted: 3 days ago)Abbott Laboratories has agreed to pay $670 million to resolve more than 2,000 Similac NEC injury lawsuits, as the first federal NEC trial against competitor Mead Johnson gets underway.MORE ABOUT: ENFAMIL AND SIMILAC BABY FORMULA LAWSUITMissouri Appeals Court Orders New Trial for Similac, Enfamil NEC Lawsuit (08/20/2026)Enfamil Necrotizing Enterocolitis Lawsuit Set for Trial to Begin This Week (08/11/2026)Neocate Infant Formula Lawsuit Alleges Nutritional Defect Caused Rickets, Bone Fractures (08/05/2026) Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (Posted: 4 days ago)A California woman’s Dupixent lymphoma lawsuit claims the manufacturers knew of the eczema drug’s cancer risks, but refused to inform doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (08/11/2026)CTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)
Judge Appoints Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL August 24, 2026
Kratom Addiction Lawsuit Alleges Opioid-Like Products Caused Addiction, Cardiac Injury August 24, 2026
Judge Appoints Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawyers to Leadership Roles in Boston Scientific MDL (Posted: today)A federal judge has appointed a group of plaintiffs attorneys to leadership positions in the growing Boston Scientific spinal cord stimulator federal litigation.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITBoston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Spine Implant Caused Nerve Damage, Shocks (08/18/2026)Nevro Stimulator Lawsuit MDL Request Opposed by Manufacturer (08/14/2026)Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (08/10/2026)
Similac Settlement Provides $670M Payout To Resolve 2,000 NEC Lawsuits (Posted: 3 days ago)Abbott Laboratories has agreed to pay $670 million to resolve more than 2,000 Similac NEC injury lawsuits, as the first federal NEC trial against competitor Mead Johnson gets underway.MORE ABOUT: ENFAMIL AND SIMILAC BABY FORMULA LAWSUITMissouri Appeals Court Orders New Trial for Similac, Enfamil NEC Lawsuit (08/20/2026)Enfamil Necrotizing Enterocolitis Lawsuit Set for Trial to Begin This Week (08/11/2026)Neocate Infant Formula Lawsuit Alleges Nutritional Defect Caused Rickets, Bone Fractures (08/05/2026)
Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (Posted: 4 days ago)A California woman’s Dupixent lymphoma lawsuit claims the manufacturers knew of the eczema drug’s cancer risks, but refused to inform doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (08/11/2026)CTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)