Scope Infection Lawsuit Patients across the United States have filed medical scope infection lawsuits after contaminated endoscopes and duodenoscopes allegedly transmitted dangerous bacterial infections during procedures such as ERCP, colonoscopy, and other endoscopic treatments.
Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit Spinal cord stimulator lawsuits allege that implanted pain devices malfunctioned, migrated, or caused nerve damage, often forcing patients to undergo revision or removal surgery.
Depo-Provera Lawsuit Depo-Provera lawsuits are being investigated for women who developed meningioma brain tumors after receiving Depo-Provera birth control shots, claiming that Pfizer failed to adequately disclose side effects.
Chlorpyrifos Parkinsonโs Disease Lawsuit Chlorpyrifos lawsuits are being investigated for individuals diagnosed with Parkinsonโs disease after direct, residential, occupational or Gulf War pesticide exposure.
Ozempic Lawsuit Lawyers are pursuing Ozempic lawsuits, Wegovy lawsuits and Mounjaro lawsuits over gastroparesis or stomach paralysis, which can leave users with long-term gastrointestinal side effects
Suboxone Tooth Decay Lawsuit Lawsuits are being pursued by users of Suboxone who experienced tooth loss, broken teeth or required dental extractions. Settlement benefits may be available.
Hair Relaxer Lawsuit Regular exposure to chemicals in hair relaxer may cause uterine cancer, ovarian cancer and other injuries. Women diagnosed with cancer may be eligible for settlement benefits.
Nitrous Oxide Lawsuit Individuals who suffered harm, or families who lost a loved one after using nitrous oxide products may be eligible for financial compensation through a nitrous oxide lawsuit.
Breast Mesh Lawsuit Lawyers are investigating breast mesh lawsuits for women who suffered infections, pain, or implant failure from internal bra implants used in breast reconstruction surgery.
Bard PowerPort Lawsuit Serious and life-threatening injuries have been linked to problems with Bard PowerPort. Lawsuits are now being pursued by individuals who suffered injuries from the implantable port catheter fracturing or migrating.
CPSC Issues Warning About Storage, Toy Chest Safety After 34 Deaths March 6, 2014 Irvin Jackson Add Your CommentsFederal safety officials are warning consumers about the serious safety risks associated with children playing around storage or toy chests, indicating that at least 34 deaths since 1996 may have been caused by children being trapped in chests. ย On March 5, the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) issued a warning about the dangers of storage chests, cedar chests, hope chests and toy chests.Many popular designs sold in the past latch automatically upon closing, which may cause children to become trapped inside. The chests are often airtight, and dozens of children have suffocated inside without any way to free themselves.Do You Know about…Spinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONDo You Know AboutโฆSpinal Cord Stimulator lawsuitsSpinal cord stimulator lawsuits are being investigated for individuals who suffered unnecessary shocks, burns or other problems, often resulting in the need for additional surgery to remove the SCS.Learn MoreSEE IF YOU QUALIFY FOR COMPENSATIONAnother problem with chests is that the heavy wooden lids can fall suddenly, entrapping the head or neck and strangling or fatally injuring children playing around them.In many cases, chests are passed down from generation to generation, resulting in a large number of homes containing chests that may pose a danger that parents may not realize.Storage Chest ProblemsThe warning comes after two children, a brother and sister from Franklin, Massachusetts, became trapped inside a 75-year-old Lane cedar chest and suffocated to death. The chest was recalled in 1996.The deaths of 8-year-old Lexi Munroe and 7-year-old Sean Munroe have renewed attention to the fact that in many cases, products that were recalled years ago for being dangerous are still in circulation. The 1996 recall of 12 million Lane cedar chests was issued due to child entrapment and suffocations risks, but the CPSC has no idea how many remain in circulation to this day.This year was the third time the recall was announced. The second came after another death in 2000, involving another Lane cedar chest that was missed by the recall announcement.Kids in Danger, a nonprofit organization focused on child-safe products, estimates that only about 30% of all items that are recalled are actually removed from consumersโ homes. That means that as many as 8.4 million of the Lane cedar chests are likely still in consumersโ homes. The organization seeks to get more manufacturers to get it right the first time, instead of relying on recalls to detect faulty products when it is often too late.Experts say that in many cases, most consumers are completely unaware of recalls involving products in their homes, even when those recalls are massive and repeated several times. Some product safety advocates have pushed for more proactive notification systems that require manufacturers to contact known purchasers of products that have been recalled. This practice is often used in the automotive industry.The CPSC warns that the types of chests affected by the warning includes toy chests, cedar chests, cedar trunks, cedar boxes, hope chests, blanket chests, storage benches, and storage trunks.“These chests may be located in living areas or bedrooms and used daily, or stored in attics, basements or garages,” the commission warns. “They often are passed down as family heirlooms or found in resale stores.”The CPSC is working with Goodwill, the Salvation Army, and the National Association of Retail Thrift Shops to educate resale store managers not to accept or sell chests that have been recalled or that could put children at risk. The commission also warns consumers not to buy or sell recalled chests that have not been repaired.If consumers have a Lane or Virginia Maid brand cedar chest made between 1912 and 1987, they should remove the latch and contact Lane for free replacement hardware. Chests with automatic latches or locks should have them disabled or removed, and consumers should check with the manufacturer to see if it is offering replacement parts.The CPSC also recommends replacing the lid’s support for chests that have lids that do not stay open in every position. The old support should be replaced with a spring-loaded one that will keep the lid open and supported in any position. Toy chests should have ventilation holes that are not blocked by the floor or wall. Written by: Irvin JacksonSenior Legal Journalist & Contributing EditorIrvin Jackson is a senior investigative reporter at AboutLawsuits.com with more than 30 years of experience covering mass tort litigation, environmental policy, and consumer safety. He previously served as Associate Editor at Inside the EPA and contributes original reporting on product liability lawsuits, regulatory failures, and nationwide litigation trends. Tags: Children, Children Furniture Recall, Strangulation, Suffocation Image Credit: |More Lawsuit Stories Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis August 20, 2026 Indoor Fire Pit Lawsuit Indicates Flame Jet Set User’s Body on Fire August 20, 2026 Missouri Appeals Court Orders New Trial for Similac, Enfamil NEC Lawsuit August 20, 2026 0 Comments EmailThis field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.Share Your CommentsFirst Name*Last NameEmail* Shared Comments*This field is hidden when viewing the formI authorize the above comments be posted on this page Yes NoPost Comment I authorize the above comments be posted on this pageWeekly Digest Opt-In Yes, send me a weekly email with the latest lawsuits, recalls and warnings.Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.Contact Phone #Alt Phone #Private CommentsNOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.CAPTCHAGA SourceGA CampaignGA MediumGA ContentGA TermΔ MORE TOP STORIES Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (Posted: today)A California woman’s Dupixent lymphoma lawsuit claims the manufacturers knew of the eczema drug’s cancer risks, but refused to inform doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (08/11/2026)CTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026) FanDuel Addiction Lawsuit Alleges Targeted Advertising Caused Substantial Gambling Losses (Posted: yesterday)A FanDuel addiction lawsuit claims a Pennsylvania man wagered massive amounts of money after being subjected to a tailored promotional campaign designed to exploit his gambling habits.MORE ABOUT: SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITDraftKings Predictions Lawsuit Seeks Refunds for Illegal Sports Betting Losses (08/11/2026)Class Action Lawsuit Claims DraftKings Is Dodging State Gambling Laws (07/31/2026)Lawsuit Claims FanDuel, DraftKings Caused Compulsive Gambling, Addiction and Financial Losses (07/24/2026) Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Spine Implant Caused Nerve Damage, Shocks (Posted: 2 days ago)A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit from a Kentucky man claims his Boston Scientific device was defectively designed, leaving him with permanent nerve damage and wire fragments fused into his bones.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro Stimulator Lawsuit MDL Request Opposed by Manufacturer (08/14/2026)Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (08/10/2026)Lawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (08/06/2026)
Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis August 20, 2026
Dupixent Lymphoma Lawsuit Alleges Atopic Dermatitis Drug Led to Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (Posted: today)A California woman’s Dupixent lymphoma lawsuit claims the manufacturers knew of the eczema drug’s cancer risks, but refused to inform doctors and patients.MORE ABOUT: DUPIXENT LAWSUITDupixent CTCL Studies Highlighted Cancer Risks For Years, Lawsuit Alleges (08/11/2026)CTCL Lawsuit Alleges Diagnosis Came After Less Than a Year of Dupixent Use (07/29/2026)Lawsuit Alleges Dupixent Caused Mycosis Fungoides Diagnosis (07/21/2026)
FanDuel Addiction Lawsuit Alleges Targeted Advertising Caused Substantial Gambling Losses (Posted: yesterday)A FanDuel addiction lawsuit claims a Pennsylvania man wagered massive amounts of money after being subjected to a tailored promotional campaign designed to exploit his gambling habits.MORE ABOUT: SPORTS BETTING ADDICTION LAWSUITDraftKings Predictions Lawsuit Seeks Refunds for Illegal Sports Betting Losses (08/11/2026)Class Action Lawsuit Claims DraftKings Is Dodging State Gambling Laws (07/31/2026)Lawsuit Claims FanDuel, DraftKings Caused Compulsive Gambling, Addiction and Financial Losses (07/24/2026)
Boston Scientific Stimulator Lawsuit Alleges Spine Implant Caused Nerve Damage, Shocks (Posted: 2 days ago)A spinal cord stimulator lawsuit from a Kentucky man claims his Boston Scientific device was defectively designed, leaving him with permanent nerve damage and wire fragments fused into his bones.MORE ABOUT: SPINAL CORD STIMULATOR LAWSUITNevro Stimulator Lawsuit MDL Request Opposed by Manufacturer (08/14/2026)Abbott Continues to Oppose Spinal Cord Stimulator Lawsuit MDL, Despite Mounting Claims (08/10/2026)Lawsuit Over Spinal Cord Stimulator Removal Claims Device Caused Numbness, Incontinence (08/06/2026)