Da Vinci Robotic Hysterectomy Complications Result in Lawsuit

Intuitive Surgical Inc. faces yet another product liability lawsuit over their da Vinci robot, filed by an Alabama couple who alleges that problems with the surgical robot during a hysterectomy resulted in the need for at least three additional surgeries and permanent injuries.

The da Vinci robotic surgery lawsuit was filed by Gwendolyn Jones and her partner, Amos Jones, Jr., in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama on April 10.

According to allegations raised in the complaint, Gwendolyn Jones suffered significant damage to her left ureter and bladder during a da Vinci robotic hysterectomy, where the doctor used the surgical robot to perform the surgery instead of other methods of hysterectomy.

Did You Know?

Millions of Philips CPAP Machines Recalled

Philips DreamStation, CPAP and BiPAP machines sold in recent years may pose a risk of cancer, lung damage and other injuries.

Learn More

The da Vinci robot is a complex machine that features four remote controlled arms and a camera, allowing surgeons to operate through a small incision with a joystick-like control.  Jones alleges that prior to her surgery she was provided a brochure outlining some of the benefits of a da Vinci robotic hysterectomy, including faster recovery times, better outcomes and less pain. However, she indicates that the surgery robot caused her to suffer permanent and debilitating injuries.

As a result of complications that arose during the robotic hysterectomy, Jones’ doctor had to convert to open laparotomy surgery with repair of the bladder. Jones was given two units of packed red blood cells due to blood loss during surgery and discharged home after three days.

Approximately two weeks later, Jones indicates that she began to have severe pain and returned to the hospital where a ureteral injury was confirmed. She subsequently underwent three additional surgical procedures, but has been left with permanent injuries.

A similar wrongful death lawsuit over the da Vinci surgical robot was filed earlier this month in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York, after Kimberly McCalla died in August 2010 following a robotic hysterectomy. As a result of the procedure, McCalla’s family alleged that she suffered a burn of the right external iliac artery, which caused it to pump blood directly into her body cavity.

Although Intuitive Surgical, the manufacturer of the da Vinci robot, promoted the device as safer than more traditional procedures, a number of similar complications during da Vinci robotic surgery have been reported.

Lawsuits over the da Vinci robot allege that Intuitive Surgical failed to adequately research the machine or warn patients and the medical community that it may increase the risk of serious complications and injuries, such as burns, dehiscences, bleeding, hematomas, sepsis and fistulas.

The Jones lawsuit seeks $490 million for pain and suffering, medical damages and loss of consortium, accusing the company of negligence, fraud, breach of warranty, and unjust enrichment.

Photo courtesy of http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Nimur / CC by 3.0


  • teldiaAugust 20, 2014 at 3:48 pm

    I had a laparoscopy with bso in 2000 and I'm still having pain in my lower stomach

"*" indicates required fields

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Have Your Comments Reviewed by a Lawyer

Provide additional contact information if you want an attorney to review your comments and contact you about a potential case. This information will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Bard Argues Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Previously Selected for Bellwether Trials Are No Longer
Bard Argues Hernia Mesh Lawsuits Previously Selected for Bellwether Trials Are No Longer "Representative" (Posted yesterday)

Bard claims two cases selected for the third and fourth bellwether trials are no longer representative of the litigation due to the plaintiffs' worsening injuries and need for additional surgeries due to their failed hernia mesh products.