DePuy ASR Hip Lawyers Negotiate Proper Preservation of Evidence

Lawyers representing both plaintiffs and defendants involved in DePuy ASR hip replacement lawsuits are working on an agreement regarding how the defective implants should be preserved and handled after they are removed. 

The negotiations are an important part of the DePuy hip litigation, because the removal and preservation of the hip implants will determine their ability to be used as evidence. The negotiations affect not only the implants, but the surrounding tissue in the recipient’s body as well.

The issue of determining how removed DePuy ASR hip replacements should be preserved came up at a hearing on Tuesday before U.S. District Judge David Katz, according to a report by Bloomberg News. Judge Katz is presiding over pretrial litigation in all federal lawsuits that have been filed over the recalled hip replacements.

Did You Know?

Ticketmaster Data Breach Impacts Millions of Customers

A massive Ticketmaster data breach exposed the names, addresses, phone numbers, credit card numbers and other personal information of more than 560 million customers, which have now been released on the dark web. Lawsuits are being pursued to obtain financial compensation.

Learn More

All of the lawsuits stem from a DePuy hip replacement recall announced in August 2010 for the DePuy ASR XL Acetabular System and DePuy ASR Hip Resurfacing System. The metal-on-metal hip implants were linked to an unacceptably high rate of problems, often resulting in revision surgery to remove the DePuy ASR hip.

After the recall was first announced, DePuy attempted to get orthopedic surgeons and patients to return the removed hip implants and surrender their medical records to the company. DePuy ASR hip lawyers representing individuals who received one of the defective implants decried the move, pointing out that hip patients may be giving up important evidence, as there were no guarantees the devices would be properly preserved.

More than 90,000 DePuy ASR XL Acetabular Systems and DePuy ASR Hip Resurfacing Systems were sold before the hip replacements were recalled. The manufacturers have acknowledged that data so far has shown that about 12% to 13% of these hips will fail within five years. However, as individuals with one of the recalled hip replacements continue to be monitored by their doctors, it is expected that the rate of DePuy ASR hip replacement problems will ultimately be much higher.

In December, the U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation consolidated the DePuy hip recall lawsuits before Judge Katz, and ordered that all cases filed in any federal district court be transferred to the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Ohio for pretrial proceedings.

In the two months since the MDL was established, the number of DePuy hip recall lawsuits transferred to Judge Katz from federal district courts throughout the United States has quickly grew to about 200 cases. However, it is expected that thousands of cases will ultimately be involved in the litigation as lawyers continue to investigate and file new hip replacement lawsuits for individuals who received one of the defective DePuy ASR implants.

0 Comments

Share Your Comments

I authorize the above comments be posted on this page*

Want your comments reviewed by a lawyer?

To have an attorney review your comments and contact you about a potential case, provide your contact information below. This will not be published.

NOTE: Providing information for review by an attorney does not form an attorney-client relationship.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

More Top Stories

Zimmer Biomet CPT Hip System Linked to Increased Risk of Thigh Bone Fractures, FDA Warns
Zimmer Biomet CPT Hip System Linked to Increased Risk of Thigh Bone Fractures, FDA Warns (Posted today)

The FDA has issued a safety communication warning that Zimmer Biomet CPT hip system femoral stems may increase the risk of femur fractures, calling for doctors to avoid its use when possible.

Change Healthcare Data Breach Lawyers Meeting Today With MDL Judge For Initial Status Conference
Change Healthcare Data Breach Lawyers Meeting Today With MDL Judge For Initial Status Conference (Posted yesterday)

The judge presiding over all Change Healthcare lawsuits filed in federal court is holding the first status conference of the litigation, which is expected to grow significantly as Change Healthcare data breach letters continue to be sent to impacted customers.

Angiodynamics LifePort Lawsuit Filed Over Risk of the Port Catheters Failing, Causing Severe Injury
Angiodynamics LifePort Lawsuit Filed Over Risk of the Port Catheters Failing, Causing Severe Injury (Posted 2 days ago)

Complaint comes as a panel of federal judges are scheduled to hear oral arguments later this month, to determine whether all AngioDynamics port catheter lawsuits filed in U.S. District Courts nationwide should be centralized before one judge.